Actually, Rama Set did it. However, it certainly implies that I smoke, and smokable substances are considered drugs.
Okay, you smoke nothing.
Drug use is not an explanation for why you cling to fairy tales.
Do you have an explanation?
I could keep guessing, but I do not want to be accused of faulty conjecture.
Disputeone seems to think that the building went from completely intact to suddenly freefalling, implying that this includes the interior.
I did not see this claim by disputeone.
Maybe I missed it.
The rest is nothing I directly disagree with, except for that you imply that I'm forgetting things, as if I've ever claimed otherwise. And it wouldn't be a "perfect" example of a controlled demolition, as it did damage neighbouring buildings. A perfect controlled demolition would not do that.
You do realize when a building is slated for a controlled demolition, announcements are made and precautionary measures are taken, correct?
Large areas of the neighboring areas are cordoned off, traffic re-routed, fences erected, surrounding buildings are boarded up, etc.?
Even then, there is collateral damage.
Unpreventable.
Only distance away from the site is fool-proof.
By "perfect," I meant the building dropped the very same way any building would drop when a building is purposefully demoed.
When it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, that goddamn thing is fucking duck.
WTC 7 was most definitely a controlled demolition.
Would I deny the slander? How do you know?
Part of the conjecture I referenced earlier.
No definitive proof, but with you tossing around the NIST like it is the Bible, I figured you would not mind me doing the same shit.