Frenat- "As the storm forms it is already moving with the ground/atmosphere."
Yeah, in a easterly direction at 1,000 MPH. How does a storm travel west, north or south if the storm clouds are moving east at 1,000 MPH?
I already explained that. They travel west by travelling slightly less than the 1000 mph east.
Similar things apply to travelling north and south.
Why gyroscopes prove a flat earth, not a spinning earth:
How about instead of linking to a shitty video you try explaining it yourself?
Lost of gyroscopes have too much friction or are unbalanced and thus can't show Earth is spinning or stationary.
F- "Rockets put into orbit need less thrust when launched to the East than to the west."
I have never run across that claim in the 3 years I've been researching flat earth. Got a link?
https://www.quora.com/Why-are-satellites-launched-from-east-coastI learnt about it in high school.
Frenat, I'll ask again{because you did not give what was requested}, do you have any evidence/clues/signs by the physical conditions on earth that support the ground is moving at 1,000 MPH?
That has already been provided to you but you ignore it.
Do you have any physical signs/clues/evidence from earth's physical condition that supports we are speeding at millions of MPH? You have not given me what should be observed from earth's physical condition. I gave just two of the many signs/evidence/clues from earth's physical condition, earth's natural nature{not man made objects, or man's math from a book}, that we are motionless, and the world is a flat plane. The physics of water alone proves we are not on a spinning speeding ball.
Why would we both when you already ignore all the evidence presented?
You have provided no evidence that we are motionless or that Earth is a flat plane.
The physics of water do not prove we are not on a spinning ball.
Of a surface speed of 1,000 MPH would hurl anything not pinned down off the surface. The ground mind you, that little piece of ground you stand on, is said to be moving at 1,000 MPH. Now, if you'll claim the ground is only moving at 4 MPH, it might be a little believable, but 1,000 MPH, COME ON, use your power of reasoning!
No. It wouldn't I explained why. The size of Earth makes that 1000 mph NOTHING.
In order to stay stuck to the surface you would need to be accelerated by another force (say gravity), at the staggering rate of 0.03 m/s^2
It is virtually nothing.
Please, do you have any physical clues/signs/evidence from earth's condition, earth's physical nature, that supports the ground is moving at 1,000 MPH? Why, Kami, when I walk upon the earth, it feels motionless, yet you'll are telling me I'm whipping along at 1,000 MPH along with the earth and the atmosphere.
Stop asking the same bullshit when it has already been provided.
Yes, you feel motionless, just like on a plane while it is cruising or in a car or a train.
You don't feel motion, you feel acceleration.
Why is it, Kami, I'm always directed to math in a book, or some fancy scientist's explanation, instead of finding the evidence/clues/signs from earth's natural condition, from the earth itself? Why is that missing?
We have told you how to find the evidence, but you just ignore it.
Hey you'll, I'm not looking for fancy explanations, I'm not looking fro math from a book, I'm looking for the physical signs/clues/evidence from the condition of nature that supports the earth is spinning at 1,000 MPH, or cruising along at millions of MPH.
And it has been provided. Stop ignoring it.
I mean, the claim is the ground, the surface, the spot you are standing on, is hurling along at 1,000 MPH, and so are you! Why don't you feel that motion? I mean, I feel the motion when I ride a bike at 10 MPH, but I don't feel 1,000 MPH? Something is not jiving here!
No. You don't.
You do not feel your motion from the bike.
What you actually feel is the wind pushing against you as you try to move into it.
As Earth moves with the atmosphere, you wouldn't feel that.
You also feel the acceleration as you speed up or slow down.
But the acceleration required to maintain a circular path you wouldn't feel it.
Go ride a bullet train and tell me if you feel its motion (while it is cruising, nor during the acceleration or retardation phases).
The evidence from earth's physical condition supports a motionless flat plane.
No it doesn't.
You are yet to provide a single shred of evidence that supports that.
So, if you have not what is being asked for, that's fine, just say so, don't try other fancy tricks to hide what you don't have. I know the empty tricks, this is not my first rodeo, by any means.
We do. Stop ignoring it.
Water on a moving vessel:
You mean water on a rapidly and inconsistently accelerating vessel?
Do you notice what it is like at 4:18?
It looks quite similar to water on Earth, at this point where they are just moving at a steady pace.
The same as at 5:30.
Would you prefer this:
That is a pool on a cruise ship.
Yes, it moves up and down a bit due to the rocking of the ship, as the ship isn't travelling in a straight path.
A better example would be a glass of water on a plane or train. It doesn't show any signs of motion, and that is because nothing does. Instead you see signs of relative motion or signs of acceleration.