i know what you try to do,
keep me up arguing about my proves only to avoid that you have to present your prove.
present your prove if you have one. you make special claims that means you have to present special prove.
Why are you here?
in this forum?
i like if i can get real prove from F.E.B. in what they believe.
But you are using everything global and trying to push them. Foucault's pendulum, you are saying proves a globe. I ask you to show me how and you made out I'm trying to hide from what my model is.
The thing you need to do, is look at what I've previously said about my model.
Here's a clue.
I cannot directly prove my model. You and everyone else knows I cannot directly prove my model.
The issue is, does my model make any sense. This is the crux of the matter.
To you and most others, it is ridiculous. It's pathetic to most people.
The reason why it's all these things is, most people do not have the faintest idea of how to put it together because they cannot or will not even try to understand it from my point of mindset view.
What you will not admit is, your globe model cannot be directly proven, either. You will argue black and blue that your globe is absolutely correct in every way, or 99.9%.....WHY?
Because you were told and shown pictures and what not, then told stories about Einstein and Newton and what not. You were given calculations that were made to back up the model. You have no clue what any of these mean in terms of actually measuring it all yourself. You merely have to accept their word for it and channel that back to people like me as if it's your truth.
Basically you are telling me about the old lady who lives next door to you. I ask if you've ever seen her and you tell me that you haven't but your mother or father saw here and kids in your street saw her.
When you ask them one to one, they tell you that it wasn't them that actually saw here, it was someone who had seen her that told them she lives there.
You go on in life accepting that this old lady lived next door, regardless of you never seeing her.
You will tell anyone about your street and your home and the old woman who lives next door and they will accept what you say.
If I question it and ask you to prove it, it means you have to go knocking on her door.
If she doesn't answer, it doesn't make you half right because you actually physically knocked to prove something to me.
It means that no matter how much back up you had and have...until that old lady answers that door, you have - and - are still dependent on stories told to you, as are anyone else who bought into it.
I am perfectly within my rights to question the story, even if I live 1000 miles away.
Now get this into your head.
I believe there's a little old man that lives near me. I've never seen this little old man but I see lots of things that points to a little old man living at the house.
I see a small wheelchair, smaller than average.
I see a tiny car.
I see a lower than normal handle on the door of the home.
I see a small waist coat and a small flat cap hanging on a washing line.
I see small shoes that are child like and male looking.
Does this mean a little old man lives there or does it require more evidence to prove it to me that one does?
This is where I'm at. I'm guessing at what's what and I cannot prove it directly.
Until I clearly and visually see a little old man come out of the house to verify my thoughts, then it could easily be a little old woman or a larger old man with small feet who likes small cars, etc, etc. A whole host of different stuff.
I wonder how many brains will take this literally because this will test out who has aspergers or not.
What can you deduce from what's been said?
(waits for the usual suspects to jump right in with the usual crap).