No Mr İntikam, YOU are wrong, the video is NOT a fake, and your "proof" is all rubbish - see below!Video is fake.
The son of whores who in the video and in the classroom both is debunked.
In this video, there is several mistakes but I want to show you one.
Come to 4:04
For a while, sun is disappearing behind the lamb at about 4:04-4:05. Slow motion play that or repeat, till you catch the point.
Now move forward.
4:07 and 4:08 again, sun is disappearing behind the pillar.
Compare the Apparent size of sun with lamb, pillar and sun.
With a bit comparing proves the video is fake. Perspective or something can be discussable. My decision will not changed.
This video proves they are producing more lies in vain, so how they are in histerical panic.
PS: If I understand true, the owner of the channel "Flat Earth Guru" isin't a flat earthher. Just a bastard is making fun with FE.
Curse and swear all you like you uncouth son of a . . . . . . - you can guess what I was going to say! But you prove nothing!
Don't worry, Mr İntikam, we can "see your point", the point is that all you have proved is that
you know nothing about photography!The lens used is obviously a very wide-angle lens. The ones that flat earthers call "fish-eye" lenses.
That is easy to see from the amount of barrel distortion (curved posts) on the video.
Even with a lens of focal length 16 mm (35 mm equiv)
the post supporting the anemometer
blocks a field width of 0.65°.
Since the angular size of the sun is typically
only about 0.52°, this is more than enough to block the light from the sun!
The sun looks much bigger when not behind a post simply because of "glare", nothing more.
So you have not proved that the video is a fake, just that you don't know what you are talking about.
Don't be so ridiculous, no Globe supporter is "in histerical panic" - whatever that is!