Vacuum holder vs gravity

Only a part of vacuum holder beats gravity.



As we see that only a part of vacuum holder is pulling up the material and beats the gravity. Also you can beat gravity with basic jumping up. But you can't escape from a vacuum holder by jumping.

But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger. Fuck off ! Fuck of bitches!

Only a part of vacuum holder beats gravity.

As we see that only a part of vacuum holder is pulling up the material and beats the gravity. Also you can beat gravity with basic jumping up. But you can't escape from a vacuum holder by jumping.

But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger. Fuck off ! Fuck of bitches!

Can anyone work out what Profesör İntikam is saying with "But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger."

The problem is that İntikam is always so completely wrong that it's impossible to know where to start.

Still, the force holding the suction cups on is simply atmospheric pressure acting on the outside and a much lower pressure (not a vacuum) on the side facing the glass.

Atmospheric pressure is caused by gravity acting on the mass of the atmosphere. So the topic title seems quite meaningless to me.

Mr İntikam, have you forgotten so soon that sweating is "haram",  naughty,  naughty!

This actual picture is proof that gravity doesn't exist.
The deniers would have you believe that gravity still works on the atmosphere and that's why this happens.
When asked what force gravity is, it turns out that it isn't a force but somehow still acts on the atmosphere.

Is it possible that gravity is an outright lie and atmospheric pressure is the absolute reason for it, as this picture shows?
Let's be totally honest. If gravity was real, it should have no problem acting on this window and frame.

The problem is, people are like programmed robots and refuse to even see it.

Quote from: İntikam on January 19, 2017, 02:08:25 AM

Only a part of vacuum holder beats gravity.

As we see that only a part of vacuum holder is pulling up the material and beats the gravity. Also you can beat gravity with basic jumping up. But you can't escape from a vacuum holder by jumping.

But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger. Fuck off ! Fuck of bitches!

Can anyone work out what Profesör İntikam is saying with "But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger."

The problem is that İntikam is always so completely wrong that it's impossible to know where to start.

Still, the force holding the suction cups on is simply atmospheric pressure acting on the outside and a much lower pressure (not a vacuum) on the side facing the glass.

Atmospheric pressure is caused by gravity acting on the mass of the atmosphere. So the topic title seems quite meaningless to me.

Mr İntikam, have you forgotten so soon that sweating is "haram",  naughty,  naughty!

I would suggest that he might have been referring to a vacuum which operates at 10^-3 of atmospheric pressure. Just a guess.

This actual picture is proof that gravity doesn't exist.
The deniers would have you believe that gravity still works on the atmosphere and that's why this happens.
When asked what force gravity is, it turns out that it isn't a force but somehow still acts on the atmosphere.

Is it possible that gravity is an outright lie and atmospheric pressure is the absolute reason for it, as this picture shows?
Let's be totally honest. If gravity was real, it should have no problem acting on this window and frame.

The problem is, people are like programmed robots and refuse to even see it.

Which it is.

Quote from: rabinoz on January 19, 2017, 02:40:50 AM

Quote from: İntikam on January 19, 2017, 02:08:25 AM

Only a part of vacuum holder beats gravity.

As we see that only a part of vacuum holder is pulling up the material and beats the gravity. Also you can beat gravity with basic jumping up. But you can't escape from a vacuum holder by jumping.

But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger. Fuck off ! Fuck of bitches!

Can anyone work out what Profesör İntikam is saying with "But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger."

The problem is that İntikam is always so completely wrong that it's impossible to know where to start.

Still, the force holding the suction cups on is simply atmospheric pressure acting on the outside and a much lower pressure (not a vacuum) on the side facing the glass.

Atmospheric pressure is caused by gravity acting on the mass of the atmosphere. So the topic title seems quite meaningless to me.

Mr İntikam, have you forgotten so soon that sweating is "haram",  naughty,  naughty!

I would suggest that he might have been referring to a vacuum which operates at 10^-3 of atmospheric pressure. Just a guess.

A wrong guess. because practise is saying vacuum is more more and more stronger.

In nature, everything wants to move to the gap. So in a perfect vacuum, it must be power goes to infinity.

It's not the vacuum that is stronger. The so called vacuum is merely lower atmospheric pressure pushed out from the window clamps which transfers that pressure to the external atmospheric pressure to push onto the windows  and squeezing from either side.

To understand a clearer picture of it in your mind, just imagine this window and clamps under water.
Imagine this before the clamps are pushed onto the window.
Now place the clamps on the window and push.
What you will observe is the clamps pushing the water out from them into the water and adding to the water pressure that immediately pushes right back onto the object that displaced the water, resulting in that clamp effect.

That's what's happening in this picture.
It kills gravity stone dead and instantly proves that atmospheric pressure is the reason why this happens and why everything happens in Earth.


Of course; like I said, we get told that gravity is reason why this happens and then we ask how and are told, it just does.

This actual picture is proof that gravity doesn't exist.
The deniers would have you believe that gravity still works on the atmosphere and that's why this happens.
When asked what force gravity is, it turns out that it isn't a force but somehow still acts on the atmosphere.

Is it possible that gravity is an outright lie and atmospheric pressure is the absolute reason for it, as this picture shows?
Let's be totally honest. If gravity was real, it should have no problem acting on this window and frame.

The problem is, people are like programmed robots and refuse to even see it.

They are looking at it but they can not see it. They are a kind of blind. They have eyes in vain.

Quote from: İntikam on January 19, 2017, 02:08:25 AM

Only a part of vacuum holder beats gravity.

As we see that only a part of vacuum holder is pulling up the material and beats the gravity. Also you can beat gravity with basic jumping up. But you can't escape from a vacuum holder by jumping.

But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger. Fuck off ! Fuck of bitches!

Can anyone work out what Profesör İntikam is saying with "But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger."

The problem is that İntikam is always so completely wrong that it's impossible to know where to start.

Still, the force holding the suction cups on is simply atmospheric pressure acting on the outside and a much lower pressure (not a vacuum) on the side facing the glass.

Atmospheric pressure is caused by gravity acting on the mass of the atmosphere. So the topic title seems quite meaningless to me.

Mr İntikam, have you forgotten so soon that sweating is "haram",  naughty,  naughty!

I will try to explain. There are powerful things and wimpy things.
Vacuum powerful thing. Grabs with mighty force!
Air pressure wimpy! No effect at all.
Vacuum sucks air pressure because stronger!

Only problem is in vacuum chamber vacuum holder gets wimpy by influence of bigger vacuum. Window fall and makes lot of pieces.
Window fall not caused by gravity. No gravity!
Window fall caused by atmosphere trapped inside glass push window down. When all atmosphere escapes glass glass will float like helium.
Helium had no atmosphere trapped so floats around.

Vacuum and air pressure have jobs to do!
Air pressure blow job vacuum suck job!
Blow and suck are like two faces of the same coin!

Please learn atmopressure and the secret of fast turbochaged cars will be revealed to you!

Me believe wimpy vacuum inside inti head.

It's not the vacuum that is stronger. The so called vacuum is merely lower atmospheric pressure pushed out from the window clamps which transfers that pressure to the external atmospheric pressure to push onto the windows  and squeezing from either side.

To understand a clearer picture of it in your mind, just imagine this window and clamps under water.
Imagine this before the clamps are pushed onto the window.
Now place the clamps on the window and push.
What you will observe is the clamps pushing the water out from them into the water and adding to the water pressure that immediately pushes right back onto the object that displaced the water, resulting in that clamp effect.

That's what's happening in this picture.
It kills gravity stone dead and instantly proves that atmospheric pressure is the reason why this happens and why everything happens in Earth.


Of course; like I said, we get told that gravity is reason why this happens and then we ask how and are told, it just does.

Doesn't even remotely disprove gravity!

Gravity is still acting on the glass trying to accelerate it downwards. The vacuum holders work on the principle the air pressure pushes equally in all directions. Therefore with no holder the pressure on each side of the glass is equal. Add the vacuum holder and reduce the pressure in the black 'cups'. Now you have a lower pressure on one side and higher pressure on the other. There is now greater force on side opposite the cups pushing the glass against them.

Quote from: sceptimatic on January 19, 2017, 03:13:21 AM

It's not the vacuum that is stronger. The so called vacuum is merely lower atmospheric pressure pushed out from the window clamps which transfers that pressure to the external atmospheric pressure to push onto the windows  and squeezing from either side.

To understand a clearer picture of it in your mind, just imagine this window and clamps under water.
Imagine this before the clamps are pushed onto the window.
Now place the clamps on the window and push.
What you will observe is the clamps pushing the water out from them into the water and adding to the water pressure that immediately pushes right back onto the object that displaced the water, resulting in that clamp effect.

That's what's happening in this picture.
It kills gravity stone dead and instantly proves that atmospheric pressure is the reason why this happens and why everything happens in Earth.


Of course; like I said, we get told that gravity is reason why this happens and then we ask how and are told, it just does.

Doesn't even remotely disprove gravity!

Gravity is still acting on the glass trying to accelerate it downwards. The vacuum holders work on the principle the air pressure pushes equally in all directions. Therefore with no holder the pressure on each side of the glass is equal. Add the vacuum holder and reduce the pressure in the black 'cups'. Now you have a lower pressure on one side and higher pressure on the other. There is now greater force on side opposite the cups pushing the glass against them.

Do you see enough of your own explanation. ? Differences of air pressures don't proves the gravity exist. There is nothing about gravity in this example, just you can deceive yourself.

It's not the vacuum that is stronger. The so called vacuum is merely lower atmospheric pressure pushed out from the window clamps which transfers that pressure to the external atmospheric pressure to push onto the windows  and squeezing from either side.

To understand a clearer picture of it in your mind, just imagine this window and clamps under water.
Imagine this before the clamps are pushed onto the window.
Now place the clamps on the window and push.
What you will observe is the clamps pushing the water out from them into the water and adding to the water pressure that immediately pushes right back onto the object that displaced the water, resulting in that clamp effect.

That's what's happening in this picture.
It kills gravity stone dead and instantly proves that atmospheric pressure is the reason why this happens and why everything happens in Earth.


Of course; like I said, we get told that gravity is reason why this happens and then we ask how and are told, it just does.

I'm not with you for this one.

This is a little two sided vacuum holder:



In this example, there is two sides and pressure of two sides are equal. But vacuum holder still works. This is an industrial material and works.

In this model, center is a bit smaller but there is some models are center is full.

Can you explain this shape by difference of pressure of sides?



Oppositely your theories, other side is closed. And two sides both works with principle of vacuum. Is it work by difference of pressure of power of gap?

Can you explain this shape by difference of pressure of sides?



Oppositely your theories, other side is closed. And two sides both works with principle of vacuum. Is it work by difference of pressure of power of gap?

The pressure that you push out of the cups is transferred back onto the back of the cups and forces them against the wall by the strength of the force of push.

Think about this picture.



Air is released out of the put together hemispheres and it causes the atmosphere to exert a crushing force by the added extra pressure that has been released from those put together hemisphere, which seals them due to that extra pressure added to the already huge pressure already on it.
The pressure has been made unequal, now, whereas before it was at equilibrium as the hemispheres pushed together were under normal atmospheric conditions.

The exact same applies to water.

Imagine these hemispheres under water.
Put them together and you have two hemispheres making a sphere that is full of water. It's at equilibrium inside and out so the dense spheres are only under their own dense mass of thickness against the water pressure.

However, if you were to allow water out of the sphere  then the water you allow out adds that much more pressure back onto the outside of the sphere and tries to crush the sphere to gain equilibrium once again due to it being changed.

"Also you can beat gravity with basic jumping up."

Intikam you keep saying that jumping "beats" gravity--I don't understand.  So when you jump, you don't come back down?

"Also you can beat gravity with basic jumping up."

Intikam you keep saying that jumping "beats" gravity--I don't understand.  So when you jump, you don't come back down?

That fits nicely with the dens pressure model. Once you are in the air, you have atmosphere pushing equally in all directions and should be able to float.

"Also you can beat gravity with basic jumping up."

Intikam you keep saying that jumping "beats" gravity--I don't understand.  So when you jump, you don't come back down?

There is a power to down but not so high. It's valid only jumping. When you arrived top point, there is no power up so you come back down. It is an example for gravity not a great power.

Quote from: İntikam on January 19, 2017, 05:18:30 AM

Can you explain this shape by difference of pressure of sides?



Oppositely your theories, other side is closed. And two sides both works with principle of vacuum. Is it work by difference of pressure of power of gap?

The pressure that you push out of the cups is transferred back onto the back of the cups and forces them against the wall by the strength of the force of push.

Think about this picture.



Air is released out of the put together hemispheres and it causes the atmosphere to exert a crushing force by the added extra pressure that has been released from those put together hemisphere, which seals them due to that extra pressure added to the already huge pressure already on it.
The pressure has been made unequal, now, whereas before it was at equilibrium as the hemispheres pushed together were under normal atmospheric conditions.

The exact same applies to water.

Imagine these hemispheres under water.
Put them together and you have two hemispheres making a sphere that is full of water. It's at equilibrium inside and out so the dense spheres are only under their own dense mass of thickness against the water pressure.

However, if you were to allow water out of the sphere  then the water you allow out adds that much more pressure back onto the outside of the sphere and tries to crush the sphere to gain equilibrium once again due to it being changed.

Air pressure isin't explain everything. Because if is enough, objects should be swim in the air by balance of the pressure. even pressure in the bottom is higher than upside. if is it, everything should be fly. So air pressure doesn't enough to explain vacuum by only itself.

Air pressure isin't explain everything. Because if is enough, objects should be swim in the air by balance of the pressure. even pressure in the bottom is higher than upside. if is it, everything should be fly. So air pressure doesn't enough to explain vacuum by only itself.

I thought you had a bit more of a thinking mind, but never mind, just stick to your thoughts.

Quote from: İntikam on January 19, 2017, 10:39:09 AM

Air pressure isin't explain everything. Because if is enough, objects should be swim in the air by balance of the pressure. even pressure in the bottom is higher than upside. if is it, everything should be fly. So air pressure doesn't enough to explain vacuum by only itself.

I thought you had a bit more of a thinking mind, but never mind, just stick to your thoughts.

Was it an argument? I can't see your point, perhaps I need to think a bit more.

perhaps I need to think a bit more.

Yes.

Quote from: İntikam on January 19, 2017, 10:39:09 AM

Air pressure isin't explain everything. Because if is enough, objects should be swim in the air by balance of the pressure. even pressure in the bottom is higher than upside. if is it, everything should be fly. So air pressure doesn't enough to explain vacuum by only itself.

I thought you had a bit more of a thinking mind, but never mind, just stick to your thoughts.

I was about to say "You thought wrong." , but Intikam did just realize your so called "denpressure" doesn't really work, so I guess he does think just a little bit.

Quote from: İntikam on January 19, 2017, 01:21:59 PM

perhaps I need to think a bit more.

Yes.

No. Be impartial. There was no new argument.

I thought you had a bit more of a thinking mind, but never mind, just stick to your thoughts.

But if you switched to a liar, let us to know it.

Quote from: Boots on January 19, 2017, 02:32:06 PM

Quote from: İntikam on January 19, 2017, 01:21:59 PM

perhaps I need to think a bit more.

Yes.

No. Be impartial. There was no new argument.

Quote from: sceptimatic on January 19, 2017, 10:42:23 AM

I thought you had a bit more of a thinking mind, but never mind, just stick to your thoughts.

But if you switched to a liar, let us to know it.

Put me on ignore.

Quote from: İntikam on January 20, 2017, 12:15:51 AM

Quote from: Boots on January 19, 2017, 02:32:06 PM

Quote from: İntikam on January 19, 2017, 01:21:59 PM

perhaps I need to think a bit more.

Yes.

No. Be impartial. There was no new argument.

Quote from: sceptimatic on January 19, 2017, 10:42:23 AM

I thought you had a bit more of a thinking mind, but never mind, just stick to your thoughts.

But if you switched to a liar, let us to know it.

Put me on ignore.

I did not said you as a liar. I was talked  with him. And It is not just an ignore. More than it. As a result it is your choice, I can't obstruck you, and haven't an idea like that.

I thought scepti was bad, but he at least can use english so we can accurately understand his nonsense. Inti's scratchings are rarely comprehensible and even then utter garbage.

Si far, I'd have to grant inti the title of the most idiotic poster on here.

I thought scepti was bad, but he at least can use english so we can accurately understand his nonsense. Inti's scratchings are rarely comprehensible and even then utter garbage.

Si far, I'd have to grant inti the title of the most idiotic poster on here.

Did we ask for your idea? It will not be a commentator who is a trash. Who do you think yourself to be?

I thought scepti was bad, but he at least can use english so we can accurately understand his nonsense. Inti's scratchings are rarely comprehensible and even then utter garbage.

Si far, I'd have to grant inti the title of the most idiotic poster on here.

Scepti is wrong but he is a clever and creative guy. He is also coherent.
Inti is a perfect example of a lying idiot.
There is no possible comparison between them.

Famous forum Swearer entered the area. Who called a dog?

Infamous hypocritical forum confused Swearer, who knows swearing is haram has entered the area. Please cover any children's eyes and ears!