So a few nut jobs claim Australia is on the equator, but you can't find their videos? THEY MUST BE RIGHT!!
But when literally every map made in the last few centuries places Australia south of the equator.
THEY ARE ALL PAID SHILLS TRYING TO DECEIVE!!!
First of all Australia, is close to the equator in his video, maybe it touches the northern tip.
I'll answer your post it two parts!
Please engage brain before sending posts! Have you ever heard those map thingies that tell you where countries are?
Have a look at these images: Lat, Long at Tip of Cape York, old Datum! I took the photo | | 1,182 km from Cape York to Equator |
I live in Australia and I've been to Cape York, (back in 2003) and
unless some flat earth idiot like you video maker has moved it, Cape York is 1,182 km south of the equator.
Before writing your rubbish about "maybe it touches the northern tip" you could have checked it out yourself.
I thought you were capable of at least being able to read. I was wrong.
I will spell it out for you again.
From the 'lost video' comments in reply #4 of this thread:
1) He uses nautical miles, and Gleason map instead of miles to begin measurements for FE
2) North pole is 0 degrees, south is 180
3) Using measurements from 1 & 2 hes able to predict the speed of the sun, and match up distances perfectly on land from Google Earth (which uses English miles)
4) Using measurements from 1 & 2, Topic of cancer circumference comes out to 25k miles which Globe Earth says is the circumference of the equator
5) He makes an observation that from google earth viewing top down (north pole), only the tropic of cancer is visible at the edge, instead of the equator
6) He makes an observation that the speed of the sun at the tropic of cancer is 1040 mph which of course is suppose to be the speed of the earths rotation at the equator
7) Using 4 & 5 He makes an observation that the entire southern hemisphere of the Globe is possibly folded under the tropic of cancer, and thus distorted.
So the OP video, also verifies much of the above information using quite a few methods, and shows Australia to touch the tip of the equator on his flat map.
Do you understand what the above means? It means the globe model is wrong. The tropic of cancer is where the equator should be and the tropic of capricorn is not far outside of that. This would make sense on a flat earth, it also means the flat earth maps like gleason, ae, or un maps do not have to be as skewed as all you shills on this forum make it out to be. You cannot project a your imaginary globe onto a flat surface. The globe never existed. In fact did you know these tropic lines do not physically exist either?
I know this is difficult for you, but try to actually read what is being said first and then respond.