Lol this thread is bonkers. No matter what sceptimatic or anyone else says you twats will never accept any alternative to gravity. No matter how nutty or foolish gravity is proven to be. There are experiments disproving the THEORY of gravity, but you people ignore those dont you.
Please show me these "experiments disproving the THEORY of gravity" that "we people ignore"!
And you say "
you people" - I presume to be so bold as believe you are addressing
me in "
you people".
You have not told
me anything about any of these "
experiments disproving the THEORY of gravity" so you
do not know that
I ignore them or whether
I know about them, have considered them and discarded them with good reason.
You accuse me (us) of generalising without reason and look what you are doing!
Now, you show:
(1) Valid experiments proving that
Newtonian Gravitation is inaccurate on a "local" scale - say within the solar system,
(2) and an alternative theory that provides better and more accurate results.
Yes, I know about General Relativity, and I'll show (by means of a reference or two - not my poor workings) that for practical calculations (
velocities << c and masses "not too large") General Relativity reduces to Newton's of motion and gravitation.
Even the sun's mass causes deviations from
Newtonian Gravitation that are apparent only by very careful astronomical observations.
That is, show me a valid and better alternative and I'll certainly accept an alternative to
gravitation.
Most alternate theories I have seen here are
far more nutty and foolish than gravitation has proven to be.
On a cosmic scale and at a sub-atomic level gravitation (at least as explained by General Relativity) might have deficiencies, but on any macro scale up to the scale of say the solar system it is
extremely accurate.
[1] I was going to foolishly say "I know all about General Relativity". I "I know about General Relativity", but certainly all abot it!
Just as I know
about quantum theory, but certainly
not all about quantum theory.