The link you posted a couple of days ago? No. The game was played last summer. You're seeing a recording of the game played back from one of youtube's servers.
I will now post your sentence with reference to the moonlanding
"No. The moon landing was before July 1969. You're seeing a recording of the staged moon landing played back from NASA."
Nice strawman!
Here's the context you conveniently omitted.
It's not a recording for playback, the stream on YouTube was LIVE when I posted it.
The link you posted a couple of days ago? No. The game was played last summer. You're seeing a recording of the game played back from one of youtube's servers.
Here is the correction:
You: "It's not a recording for playback, the stream on YouTube was LIVE when I posted it."
Me: "No. The moon landing was in July 1969. You're seeing a recording of the live broadcast of the event as it was happening back then."
Unless the players are back on the field, commentators in the booth, and the fans in the stands recreating the game in exact detail every time you watch it, it's not live. Sorry.
You're not very smart are you? The video is a live stream, it's displayed as it's received from the person broadcasting it. The contents is the football match that was played before (i.e. not live)
In fact, I just played it and it's still live. You can't forward it as it's a LIVE stream.
Are you confusing streaming video with live streaming? Live streaming is a particular kind of streaming.
Nope, i never once said "streaming video" - I said "live stream"
I know. You use "live stream" when you meant "stream" or "streaming video". That's wrong.
- 1 broadcast to the server that pushes it out to viewers. Still confused?
Thoroughly. I don't understand how you could consider recorded content from last year to be "live" when you view it today. I have to admit - I'm mystified how someone could be confused about something as simple as this.
- 1 stream of live content to a server that immediately pushes it out to viewers.
That's a live stream.
- 1 (or more) stream(s) of previously uploaded content on the server that it pushes out to viewers.
That's a stream. See the difference yet?
In TV terms, 1 broadcast (staged moon landing) to the TV station that pushed it out to viewers.
"Broadcast" isn't exactly correct here since distribution of most such content to TV stations was point-to-point (which isn't "broadcast"), but close enough for this.
More accurately:
- 1 broadcast of analog moon landing video, taking place at the time, to a TV station that pushed it out to viewers as it arrived.
That's a live broadcast.
Replay of recording of the above live broadcast pushed by a TV station out to viewers later.
Not a live broadcast of the event.
Got it?
Live streaming refers to Internet content delivered in real-time, as events happen, much as live television broadcasts its contents over the airwaves via a television signal.
And your point is?
You're confused about what a live stream is.
Live streaming is content that is streamed as it's happening. Did you miss "as it's happening" in the quote? Is that really hard to understand?
Streaming media is multimedia that is constantly received by and presented to an end-user while being delivered by a provider. The verb "to stream" refers to the process of delivering or obtaining media in this manner; the term refers to the delivery method of the medium, rather than the medium itself, and is an alternative to file downloading, a process in which the end-user obtains the entire file for the content before watching or listening to it.
Again, your point is?
Streaming is delivering content for immediate consumption as it's being transferred (viewing, in the case of video). Streaming makes no distinction whether the content is being transferred at the same time as it's being created (i.e. live), or from archive. If the content is live at the time it's also being streamed, that's a live stream.
It's ok to try and feel clever.
There's no use for me to be clever when you can't grasp the basics.
But the contents are NOT live.
Then it's not a live broadcast (or a live stream). I'm glad that's settled. Was it really that difficult to understand?
Yes, it's still a live broadcast whether the contents are live or not.
This is not correct.
The broadcast is live, the contents are not live.
It's not a live broadcast unless it has live content. Otherwise the term 'live broadcast' has no meaning. Shouldn't that be self-evident? This is getting tedious.
Radio is live but the songs are not being performed that very second.
Radio is live when someone is, for instance, speaking (or singing, etc.) into a microphone and the audio is going to the transmitter as it's generated. When a DJ is playing a record and that signal is going to the transmitter, that material is pre-recorded. When the DJ is talking over the music, the patter is live, but the music still isn't. You're going way into the weeds here.
You can have a live broadcast that contains some pre-recorded material, sure. If the broadcast is entirely pre-recorded, how could you justify calling it 'live'?
This has ALWAYS been possible with live broadcasts. That's the point. POSSIBLE
Not true. In the early days of television, it wasn't even possible to record video except on film. It wasn't until the late '50s that a practical video tape recorder was developed. For the first decade or so, TV broadcasts were either from movie film converted to video, or live - that is, with signals from a camera effectively connected directly to the transmitter (although the signal bound for the transmitter could be split and recorded to film at the same time, if desired). Note that the conversion from film to video produces recognizable artifacts, so passing off movie film as "live television" to a reasonably astute audience wouldn't work.
I don't know how old you are, but it might come as a surprise to you that youtube didn't exist at the time of the Apollo moon landings. There wasn't even an internet then, streams were flowing liquid, and servers were people working in restaurants or playing volleyball, tennis, and the like.
Youtube didn't exist in 1969? Oh no!!!!
Sorry! Since your argument seems to hinge on streamed content, I thought you should know.
Any more questions about the answer to your "ALWAYS POSSIBLE" claim?
Anyway, the more you try to be clever the harder you'll fall.
I try to keep it as simple as possible but sometimes it's not possible to make things simple enough for some people to understand. If this is still too complicated for you, I'm sure you'll let me know.
The moon landing was not broadcast directly from the moon. It was not a live feed. You'll find that information from NASA.
Are you referring to the scan conversion step? That doesn't matter. This was all happening in real time: camera on moon, signal transmitted to earth and received in Australia and converted from slow-scan to NTSC, NTSC signal is relayed to TV networks who distribute it for broadcast to homes. There are a lot of steps, but all this was happening as the signals were being generated. IOW, live.
So you're wrong in pretty much every possible way in trying to be clever. Good effort though. The fact that the TV broadcast was provided by NASA (from Earth) - ANYTHING CAN be provided.
There is no evidence that all the necessary equipment to fake the moon landings existed in 1969, only speculation based on misconceptions by you and others that it might have been possible.
That's all.
That's not much.
And for the millionth time, WHETHER they did or didn't isn't the argument
OK. Good. They didn't. No argument.
the point is simply that they COULD, POSSIBLE... Unless you can prove it's impossible, stick to the topic
"Prove"?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200811/common-misconceptions-about-science-i-scientific-proofYour assertion is that there's a conspiracy capable of faking anything it wants to fake, so anything can be faked. First, this conspiracy needs to exist. You need to show some evidence. Next, you need to show that they had all the equipment needed to accomplish what you claim they did. Otherwise your argument falls apart there.
You've really cornered yourself now
Lol!