Yea, you aren't so good at this are you? He doesn't say he's "just a light guy". He clarified that he started out as "just a light guy". I never thought he was the "leading expert" in his field. It doesn't matter if he is. He researched his argument. He provided evidence for his argument. And in the second video he clarified things.
so we have an average guy doing some insignifricant things in the film industry, no one in particular, who all of a sudden decides it is his duty to get into the moonlandings in detail from a professional point of view.
The window dressing, the calm voice, the neutral stand about trusting covernments,.......o boy this guy has never participated in the debate, commented on the Apollo and all of a sudden he makes a debunking pretentious debunking video.
And now we have not heard from him to participate in the ongoing debate.
A suspicious ephemera that wants to get on with his live........wtf ? is the debate not important enough to continue ?
I believe he did not expect so much negativity....a true debater accepts and wants to continue, but he wants to get on with his normal life making insignificant.....uh ''films'' ?
Is he not a filmmaker? Does he not make films? His YouTube is full of "films" he's made. He admits to making tons of commercials and documentaries.
He presents himself as someone with high credentials that knows the ins and outs of the film industry for more than 30 years about film, filmmaking, lightening and equipment that is used today and in the late sixties and seventies...
Only to realise that he should have mentioned in the first vid that he was nobody in particular in the filmindustry and your average lightguy reflects his abilities nicely.
To hear him say that in the second video is in hindsight. Should have set his own film achievements strait from the beginning.
Again. It doesn't matter if he invented film or if he was just some homeless guy on the street. His argument was well presented and his evidence cannot be refuted. As you can see, jarrah tried, and failed. You don't need to be an expert to make an educated and well researched argument. Though it does help if you are in the business and know what you are looking for in the first place.
Fail ! His initial vid sounds scripted ! A bit historical backgound, a bit of info on film, all easy going and smooth........but clearly someone who wants to continue with his life after dropping a bomb, but not really interrested in an ongoing debate about Apollo.
Collins said :
'when you listen to them they do not seem to know very much about photography or video, or lightening, or even perspective and i think'they hope you don't either''Wow, David Percy and the ''aulis'' site, proof this is utter bogus and Collins hopes you don't realise there are many persons doubting the Apollo footage with more credentials than him.
But instead of going to the next level, poor Collins wants to go back to his normal life.
Oh yup, now the paranoid side is coming out in you. Paid shill!? What makes you think that? Is it your paranoid delusional mind? I think it is!
One video, pretending to know it all, smooth scripted layout, window dressing as a genuine filmmaker, but wants to continue with his life the moment he stumbles upon some critics.
The whole video is a refutation of jarrahs video, it contradicts absolutely non of his original video other than clarifying that he isn't special compared to other people who are in the same business. Again you don't need to be different than someone to put forth an educated argument. You just need to reasearch your topic well and provide sources for you're evidence. Which he does, very, very well.
He debunks himself,.......that is way better than presenting Jarrah's video, because then you would have said that Jarrah is insane.
Now i post his own video, which clearly reveals what a louzy authority he is on the whole subject.
But i guess this is way over your head.......
Clearly you are confused but again I thank you for refuting your own argument. I know your brain prevents you from seeing it that way but clearly this isn't the only disablitly you have. I would expect nothing less from someone who cannot understand things that are being presented to him. Is ignorant of science, and believes 911 was an inside job done by holograms.
Holograms ?, but i thought that those technigues weren't available in 2001
I don't know about 9/11, what i do know is that Secretary Norman Mineta gave a vailable testimony that was skipped from the records, because his remarks would clearly indicate goverment involvement one way or the other
And the collapse of building 7 was a 100% demolotion according to the top authority in the field from my country the Netherlands who was shown the footage without knowing it was on 9/11 !
Be my guest if you want to discuss more, but i advise you to be more critical...and i am willing to support you with that !