Poll

Thanks for participating in this scientific poll meant to arrive at a data-based conclusion. RE'ers are ...

unable to make sound arguments
poor readers
typically from a minority class
unwilling to visit the ice shelf
going to vote for this one, and stupid

Data: Is RET consistent with science?

  • 14 Replies
  • 969 Views
?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« on: November 15, 2016, 05:37:31 PM »
Let's find out what the numbers, and whether RE'ers are serious about science.

*

RocksEverywhere

  • 1041
  • Literally everywhere.
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2016, 01:45:05 AM »
We get it, you're an annoying troll, now go play with your dolls.
AMA: https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=68045.0

Just because you don't understand something, doesn't mean it's not real.

Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2016, 01:59:25 AM »
Yet another attempt at a joke by a FE'er, who by definition is a joke himself. Why not divert the discussions away from the ones FE'ers cannot answer so that the roundies can forget about them. Go and try to answer some of the serious posts rather than showing your true intentions.

*

rabinoz

  • 22632
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2016, 02:14:52 AM »
Let's find out what the numbers, and whether RE'ers are serious about science.
Sure! A typical Flat Earth poll with all idiotic biased options!

Thanks for participating in this scientific poll meant to arrive at a data-based conclusion. Flat Earthers are ...
  • unable to make sound arguments
  • poor readers
  • typically from an uneducated class
  • unwilling to visit the South Pole
  • completely devoid of understanding and stupid.
  • completely lacking in understanding of the globe.
Select all that are applicable.

No, I would not claim that sort of thing.
In fact, I don't know many that are complete bigots like yourself who do their best to twist all evidence.

Still, it is what we expect from a character like yourself. Luckily there are not many in your league.

Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2016, 08:36:59 AM »
Another defeat to FET!!

*

Crouton

  • Flat Earth Inspector General of High Fashion Crimes and Misdemeanors
  • Planar Moderator
  • 9666
  • V is for Viceroy
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2016, 06:01:26 PM »
How is it that narcberries threads aren't moved into angry ranting? Does his seniority grant him a certain level of protection?
Intelligentia et magnanimitas vincvnt violentiam et desperationem.
The truth behind NASA's budget

Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2016, 06:53:13 PM »
Poll is incomplete. OP forgot to add:

o When did you stop beating your wife?
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." - Daniel Patrick Moynihan

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2016, 05:35:46 PM »
I have to say, I expected some negative reaction to the data - but really RE'ers lets keep the debate constructive and reasonable.

Thanks,
Flat Earth Moderator

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3598
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2016, 06:54:06 PM »
What a completely one sided poll.
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • Planar Moderator
  • 37806
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2016, 07:45:10 PM »
Stop mocking the poles, dammit. 

*

rabinoz

  • 22632
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2016, 10:06:37 PM »
I have to say, I expected some negative reaction to the data - but really RE'ers lets keep the debate constructive and reasonable.

Thanks,
Flat Earth Moderator
With your usual deviousness, you construct a one sided poll, then ask for "the debate constructive and reasonable."

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2016, 12:29:18 AM »
Don't get butthurt about the data, man

*

rabinoz

  • 22632
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2016, 12:39:30 AM »
Don't get butthurt about the data, man
What data? As usual you have no data and no evidence, just "the Narc" says. That just means nothing at all.

I claim "RET is consistent with science, but FET (in all it's numerous guises) is quite inconsistent.

Any objections?

Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2016, 01:14:22 AM »
Why no Donald Trump option? He won the last biassed FE poll, so no doubt he would win this one too!
When will these stupid polls be banned?

?

narcberry

  • 5566
  • Reason > RET
Re: Data: Is RET consistent with science?
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2016, 11:43:43 AM »
Don't get butthurt about the data, man
What data? As usual you have no data and no evidence, just "the Narc" says. That just means nothing at all.

I claim "RET is consistent with science, but FET (in all it's numerous guises) is quite inconsistent.

Any objections?

You got as many votes as I did.