Best FE debunk (?)

  • 14 Replies
  • 1374 Views
Best FE debunk (?)
« on: November 23, 2016, 01:19:34 AM »
I am not saying this debunks flat earth, these are just things that I've never gotten a response about. These questions are directed for those who believe in a stationary earth.

Octans: http://i.imgur.com/AJvO9pw.png

Day/night: http://m.imgur.com/CHSpwlC

New Zealand sunrise/set: http://imgur.com/WDFmQ3Y

Sun should increase speed: http://imgur.com/rCS96Vq

Sun rise/set angles for northern/southern hemisphere: http://imgur.com/OPn98AQ

Lowest point of the sun?: http://imgur.com/xBdT3au

Solar energy: http://imgur.com/Lr3O3NS

How far away is the sun?: http://imgur.com/aMA7WLR

Where is Polaris?: https://goo.gl/images/giv4qK

Would love a answer to all of these, thanks!

Edit: I took out Anti-Crepuscular rays as I just realised the answer myself haha
« Last Edit: November 23, 2016, 01:38:02 AM by NeutralProspective »

Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2016, 02:16:24 AM »
Good luck getting direct responses, you will just be led on a wild goose chase through old threads which went silent when no answer could be provided!

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18639
  • Backstage
Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2016, 02:18:25 AM »
There is no debunk so there is no best.
The moment you are closest to victory is the moment you are most desperate. Take note of wise with you, not with them.



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2016, 02:23:33 AM »
Intikam anagram, 'Man I tik', which I guess includes his his way of spelling thick!

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18639
  • Backstage
Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2016, 02:24:44 AM »
This one is dead:

The moment you are closest to victory is the moment you are most desperate. Take note of wise with you, not with them.



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18639
  • Backstage
Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2016, 02:29:59 AM »
Ahahah this working is not FE debunk. This working is a "FE official map debunk".

Thank you for supporting. I recommend use my model instead of it:

As a shape like that;



Think again when you are listening this music and don't turn back:



« Last Edit: November 23, 2016, 02:34:40 AM by İntikam »
The moment you are closest to victory is the moment you are most desperate. Take note of wise with you, not with them.



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #6 on: November 23, 2016, 02:39:00 AM »
This one is dead:



What is that debunking? It shows a FE map with a sun over about the Tropic of Capricorn, yes the North Pole is in sunlight! WTF, the North Pole has 365 days sunlight now?

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18639
  • Backstage
Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #7 on: November 23, 2016, 03:17:26 AM »
This one is dead:



What is that debunking? It shows a FE map with a sun over about the Tropic of Capricorn, yes the North Pole is in sunlight! WTF, the North Pole has 365 days sunlight now?

That map is not so true. I drawn it by you understand it. You can correct it by your mind by correcting the line a bit backward.

Meanwhile don't forget it is 6 months sunny and 6 months night in the North pole. You can think this shape as North summer.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2016, 03:29:07 AM by İntikam »
The moment you are closest to victory is the moment you are most desperate. Take note of wise with you, not with them.



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #8 on: November 23, 2016, 03:53:05 AM »
Oh yes I can, but now explain why the whole ice wall has 24 hour sunlight in the Southern Hemisphere summer! Oops! And no, it is not a lie, ask the 400000 people who have been there in the last ten years! Better still, go there yourself and become an honest observer.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18639
  • Backstage
Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2016, 04:16:09 AM »
You claim there is 400000 liar on the antarctica? I should not believe it.
The moment you are closest to victory is the moment you are most desperate. Take note of wise with you, not with them.



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

JRoweSkeptic

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 5407
  • DET Developer
Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #10 on: November 23, 2016, 07:47:07 AM »
Would you actually take the time to learn a model when it's presented?
http://fet.wikia.com
dualearththeory.proboards.com/
On the sister site if you want to talk.

Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #11 on: November 23, 2016, 11:33:21 AM »
Would you actually take the time to learn a model when it's presented?
Sometimes it's hard to when "aether whirlpools" are all that hold it together.

Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2016, 12:59:28 AM »
You claim there is 400000 liar on the antarctica? I should not believe it.
No, if you understood English, I said that over the last ten years there have been over 400000 visitors (tourists, crew, researchers), and that is ignoring all the soldiers that FE'ers believe guard the ice-wall of 60000 flat earth miles. You don't believe anything, so why bother reading the posts?

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18639
  • Backstage
Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2016, 11:20:55 AM »
Oppositely i'm believer and you aren't. I'm reading for my reasons that not neccessary to explain why. Am i asking why do you read our posts? Do you rounders generally believe me? No. You are believing only what you want to believe. So what is your difference than you critise?
« Last Edit: November 26, 2016, 11:22:37 AM by İntikam »
The moment you are closest to victory is the moment you are most desperate. Take note of wise with you, not with them.



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

Re: Best FE debunk (?)
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2016, 11:30:10 AM »
Would you actually take the time to learn a model when it's presented?
I'd like to see a working flat earth "model" - not an image or animation. Something like Google Earth or the numerous apps on iPhone, Android, PC and Mac.

Another thing, Globe Earth when presented does not need "learning" as it's clearly visible what's happening just by **observing** it. Why does Flat Earth require an understanding of alien physics? Any response?