Round Earth debunk! Google map is a nonsence!

As we see that google map is a nonsence and for set the real map to nonsence map, they are deleting, adding, cutting, copying, pasting,turning, returning, makes somersaults, and he's making it up.

We see this truth several times.

This simt i'll show you how google is deleting the land for set reality to nonsence round map:

Click here and see a place on google map: https://www.google.com/maps/@-66.4601695,110.527946,13.01z

You'll see a map as follow:



What did you see? An island and a ground.

Okey now click this link:

https://www.google.com/maps/@-66.4601695,110.527946,6023m/data=!3m1!1e3

You'll see a view as follow:



And surprise, these two places are same. 

Take care the island on the map is smaller and the island on the real is bigger.

Click to map view and earth view. You see the difference exactly.

Generally they were saying us "the ice is melted". But there is a big part of ground. Whats happened to ground, is it melted?



Now zoom the area marked as two:

You can see it by clicking this link:

https://www.google.com/maps/@-66.4428547,110.634912,20345m/data=!3m1!1e3



It seems like there is an "inside sea" there. Is it really?

Zoom to this point:

https://www.google.com/maps/@-66.4160328,110.6755932,267m/data=!3m1!1e3



The left side is a small mountain seems like continue but suddently cutted by "google inside sea".

Now zoom to "casey station" with earth view. Link:

https://www.google.com/maps/@-66.3021569,110.5020743,7940m/data=!3m1!1e3



Click to "map" now:



So; where all of these islands are gone?



Why is google doing this? Because the real and the map can't overlap. So it forcing something for gain or loose room how much requered.

add some island here there is a gap.
delete these islands there is not room for sea.

copy these islands to this place and delete this mountains to place sea there.

okey we got it. this is round map. idiots will believe this. 

What are you raging about? Your inability to figure out that the ice can melt, google isn't accurate on deserted lands or that not every place on Earth is perfectly covered with google maps?

Meantime, your flat earth mape is a joke. It looks like a child from a kindergarden drawing random lines on a paper. And then he calls it a map. A map that has no accuracy at all. Meantime, google maps do have sufficient accuracy for most habitated lands.

You can see online how is google working on map:

"cut, merge, copy, past".

First look the image:



This image taken by this link!

https://www.google.com/maps/@-70.6063466,-7.875247,62193m/data=!3m1!1e3

The link is now working but next i don't know if it works or not. Now it is working.

What are you raging about? Your inability to figure out that the ice can melt, google isn't accurate on deserted lands or that not every place on Earth is perfectly covered with google maps?

Meantime, your flat earth mape is a joke. It looks like a child from a kindergarden drawing random lines on a paper. And then he calls it a map. A map that has no accuracy at all. Meantime, google maps do have sufficient accuracy for most habitated lands.

Didn't you see "mountains disapperead as melted".

Or inaccuracy of the sketch map. It's rather simple, whereas changing to terrain layer reveals much more detail. I see nothing wrong with that.

As we see that google map is a nonsence and for set the real map to nonsence map, they are deleting, adding, cutting, copying, pasting,turning, returning, makes somersaults, and he's making it up.

Now zoom to "casey station" with earth view. Link:

Click to "map" now:

So; where all of these islands are gone?

copy these islands to this place and delete this mountains to place sea there.

Stop wasting our time with your stupid ignorance.

The Google map, in terrain display, shows the boundary of the land, though it is a bit course when expanded excessively.

What you are looking at is Google maps in satellite display mode, that is Google Earth.

Now the Google Earth display, when at very low eye height, is made up of aerial photos "stitched" together.
These photos may be taken at different times of the year, so some photos may have no ice, some solid ice and some broken ice.

I worked on it a bit.

Image taken by this link (still works)

https://www.google.com/maps/@-70.6063466,-7.875247,62193m/data=!3m1!1e3



Rule: If you merge right side of an image to left side of another image which are similar, you can't merge the other side. It needs a new nonsence merging.

If Google wants to cover something up you can be sure that they will actually try to cover it up. But they don't, so they will not bother with smoothing these borders because it makes no sense to do so. They literally just show the most recent (or best quality non-clouded?) satellite imagery that they have available for Google Earth.

Don't cry rounder don't cry.

The circumference of Antarctica is on google 14.000 kms. It is possible with 16 hours working with a humanless plane by one day to get photo every edge. But images seems like some of them summer, some of them winter.

This is a nonsence just aims change the reality.

It is really about 60.000-80.000 kms, not 14.000. So they are trying to defend the lie that all of most known maps share.

60,000km is less that flat earth equator length.

80,000km is less than flat earth southern tropic length.

Based on some flat earth maps.

Who are you tying to convince?

Also, source of that 60-80k km.

It is really about 60.000-80.000 kms, not 14.000. So they are trying to defend the lie that all of most known maps share.

You do not have any evidence for that claim.

60,000km is less that flat earth equator length.

80,000km is less than flat earth southern tropic length.

Based on some flat earth maps.

Who are you tying to convince?

Also, source of that 60-80k km.

What is "flat earth equator lenght?".

You can't claim something i don't accept as my accepted thinking. I'm already working on my flat earth map and the value i write measured on my map.

This is an earlier version but i find just this one for this time. I measured it now by online.

I draw a circle around all of cities as surround with enought gap to everything. I can get this circle as edge of Antarctica. It is near.

and diameter is...



D= 22.000 kms.

The circumference is about 69313 kms. I said it about 60 000-80 000 kms. I think there is no mistake.

Show me the measurements on the other FE maps.

This image taken after google photo shoper worked on it.

Link: https://www.google.com/maps/@-70.6063466,-7.875247,62193m/data=!3m1!1e3 (same link)

image:



This is the old version of same place:



Lets compare them and detect what "photoshop worker" did.



➊ Colored there with color of other places around. As grey. But there is still a mistaken. Water moved to ground inside it. But other places there is "half melted" area.
➋That area is colored as others.
➌That area is filled by ices. It seems like sea is frozen. But what's that, some of other places did not frozen! (look to 4)
➍Nothing is changed. Sea did not frozen, color did not changed. Photo shop man like this area. It is ready by itself.
➎This area is colored, photo edited, marged, continued the lines as seems like natural. Photo shoper worked here good. 
➏The stray ices travel around are tamed with one touch: "delete".

And the left side of the image there is still a light. I think worker don't need to change it. Because it doesn't cut the harmony and idiots already believing everything. 

This is our sattelite view.All built by a man working on photoshop.

This post is a proof of cooperation between google and NASA.

Because; photo shop worker in google is sattelite.

  Ladies and gentlemen; this image taken by Japan Fuckowari 6 sattelite by supporting of NASA tecnology (tecnology=photoshop)   



And people; 

So how does a single update/modification/whatever of a piece of Antarctica land/inconstistence of google maps debunks the globe? What's the logic you've chosen to follow to deduct such a statement?

Wow - areas where there is sea ice look different over time? Who could have figured it out!

Who else but intikam!

So how does a single update/modification/whatever of a piece of Antarctica land/inconstistence of google maps debunks the globe? What's the logic you've chosen to follow to deduct such a statement?

It is not only one. There is several photoshop editing on Antarctica. There is almost no real photo taken by humanless planes. Just a few. Because Antarctica edge is about 70k kms and google moderators trying to convert it to about 14 kms. How they can do that? They are cutting the edges and hiding some grounds about 56.000 kms.

When a discoverer find out a place wrong on map, google than correct that place with photoshop cheat. Another discover and another cheat. Google is hiding truth.

It is not only one. There is several photoshop editing on Antarctica. There is almost no real photo taken by humanless planes. Just a few. Because Antarctica edge is about 70k kms and google moderators trying to convert it to about 14 kms. How they can do that? They are cutting the edges and hiding some grounds about 56.000 kms.

When a discoverer find out a place wrong on map, google than correct that place with photoshop cheat. Another discover and another cheat. Google is hiding truth.

Please show proof that the circumference os Antarctica is about 70,000 km! Either put up or shut up.