I do believe I could say:
Do you, per chance, actually read my posts, Ski? Or do you just copy and paste the same stuff over and over and act surprised that I don't follow you around to answer the questions I've already answered?Moonlight is almost exactly the same colour as sunlight.
Yes, and any waves with almost exactly the same frequency will interact to create interference.
No, waves of "almost exactly the same frequency will" NOT "interact to create interference" - it is not possible.
Uhm, waves of any frequency will interact. That is what "interference" is.
But waves of just any frequency cannot cause constructive or destructive interference with waves of another frequency.
Solar radiation is close to the sum of the
black body radiation from a number of sources at different temperatures. Most of the light comes from the roughly 500 km thick
Photosphere with different temperatures at different depths.
Black body radiation is a
random or stochastic process, and does not produce any
periodic waveform. It can be filtered, say with a prism and slit, to produce something closer to a single frequency.
For waves to cause destructive interference they most be of the same frequency and for complete cancellation exactly 180° out of phase.
This is essentially correct.
You really need to learn a bit of simple physics before boxing yourself into a corner you can't get out of!
Physician, heal thyself
No, I need no healing on this matter. I honestly believe that what I am explaining to you is correct.
5.1 General Properties of Waves
As it turns out, when waves are at the same place at the same time, the amplitudes of the waves simply add together and this is really all we need to know!
Tadaa!
Stop being such a smart alec! Sunlight cannot be looked on as a simple wave that can add to or sub or subtract delayed versions of itself. Up to that point Gibson''s notes have been referring only to simply
sine waves, not complex waves like
black body radiation!It would have been wise to read a bit further! "Although this statement is easy to make, that two waves in the same space at the same time simply add together,
actually calculating the effects of this can be quite tricky. A number of unusual things can happen because of this property of waves, and are generally called interference effects. We will explore several consequences of interference in the next few sections."
But, please don't pretend that you know something of this topic, I can clearly see that you don't.
I think you simply think you know more than you do.
No, i don't believe so. I already said that Physics was not may "major" area, but I have been in a related area for long enough to know what I am talking about!
So no, destructive interference between sunlight and another light source (or a reflected version of itself)
This will be of great interest to Thomas Young who gave birth to the twin-slit experiment demonstrating interference using... sunlight...
No, no problem for Thomas Young, you did understand what he did, I hope.
Young's interference experiment
"In order that the effects of two portions of light may be thus combined, it is necessary that they be derived from the same origin, and that they arrive at the same point by different paths, in directions not much deviating from each other. This deviation may be produced in one or both of the portions by diffraction, by reflection, by refraction, or by any of these effects combined; but the simplest case appears to be, when a beam of homogeneous light falls on a screen in which there are two very small holes or slits, which may be considered as centres of divergence, from whence the light is diffracted in every direction."
In Young's experiment the two light sources were
"derived from the same origin" and and traveled
"in directions not much deviating from each other". The two beams were from the same source and travelled almost exactly the same distance.
You might note that modern versions of the experiment often use light filtered by a prism and a single slit or they use a laser light source that produces almost coherent light.
But the same conditions do not hold for sunlight and moonlight, whether or not moonlight is reflected sunlight or from some other source.
Lunar eclipses cannot be caused be "destructive interference" with sunlight.
Yes, I do know what I am talking about, and no smart "Tadaa!" on your part changes that.
I am not looking to score points or sound smart as you seem to be trying to do. I am simply pointing out a few basic points of Physics.