What more proof do you need?

  • 57 Replies
  • 13926 Views
*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
What more proof do you need?
« on: September 18, 2016, 07:33:09 PM »


Quote
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
Psalm 19:1
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

*

Hamzah

  • 1450
  • +1/-0
  • The Exposer Of Insecurities
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2016, 07:36:22 PM »
Deaf, dumb, and blind, they will not return (to the path). Al-Baqara (The Cow) - 2:18




*

disputeone

  • 27998
  • +109/-90
  • Or should I?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2016, 08:03:36 PM »
This should've been posted under philosophy and religion.

If your point is that the bible says the earth is flat.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +2/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2016, 08:09:45 PM »
You have proved winter.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45077
  • +87/-106
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2016, 08:44:16 PM »


Quote
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
Psalm 19:1
Obvious photoshop.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2016, 08:52:10 PM »


Quote
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
Psalm 19:1
I agree and have said as much before. But what has that to do with the shape of the earth?

Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2016, 07:30:59 AM »
Yes isn't it great that god mad such a b auricular night sky?

Seriously, firmament is as vague a term as you can get.

Water above the firmament could mean clouds for all we know.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2016, 07:59:45 AM »
LOL @ all the people saying photoshop.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

?

Brouwer

  • 830
  • +0/-0
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2016, 08:01:58 AM »
So the firnament is a ring of "something" surrounding the earth? Not a dome anymore?

*

29silhouette

  • 3374
  • +0/-0
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #9 on: September 19, 2016, 08:44:18 AM »
That's a nice panoramic of the Milky Way.  What about it?

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2016, 08:59:51 AM »
LOL @ all the people saying photoshop.
Well, he does use photoshop. He teaches classes that include "Digital lab" processing.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45077
  • +87/-106
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2016, 09:46:51 AM »
LOL @ all the people saying photoshop.

LOL @ iWitness for thinking that perfect pictures come out of cameras.
After the classroom session, we'll head up Trail Ridge Road to shoot sunset and the soft magic of twilight. When the sky becomes completely dark about two hours after sunset, we'll work on shots of the Milky Way over Longs Peak. For some of the images, we’ll use flat-panel LED lights to bathe the foreground rock outcrops in a warm glow. On Sunday I’ll teach students how to process photos of the Milky Way in Lightroom and Photoshop. I’ll start by showing students my approach to editing a single-frame shot of the Milky Way, then show students how to combine two frames, one exposed for land, the other exposed for sky, to create an image that is richly detailed throughout.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

getrealzommb

  • 894
  • +0/-0
  • We do actually live on a ball: But who cares?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2016, 10:24:15 AM »
So... iWitness, why are these clouds lit underneath?

 

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3735
  • +9/-7
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #13 on: September 19, 2016, 10:32:46 AM »

How does a panoramic picture of the Milky Way proves anything?

Quote
Quote
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
Psalm 19:1

Genesis 1:8 "And God called the firmament Heaven."

Genesis 1:20 "And God said, Let the water bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and that that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven."

The firmament is the sky. Nothing else.
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2016, 12:06:52 PM »
The Bible is clear that the Firmament is a Solid Dome (Raqiya) that separates Water Above from Water Below.

Quote
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
Genesis 1:6-8

The Bible is also clear that the Stars are Lights that were placed INSIDE the Firmament to mark the times, seasons and religious festivals. This alone proves universal expansion incorrect because year after year the Stars move according to the seasons and return back where the started. In fact, after 5000 years of reliable historical records and star charts, NONE of the constellations or stars have shifted. The Big Dipper is still the Big Dipper, and Leo is still Leo.



The Visible Arch of the Milky Way Galaxy is an undisputed fact.

The explanation however, is that the curve is due to the spiral of the arm:


But notice how the Sun is not even visible in the diagram and the stars are much bigger than the sun, NOT TO MENTION that GIANT BRIGHT CENTER of the Milky Way that should somehow be visible in the night sky.

This is not consistent with stars all appear to be small and the same size with the Sun and Moon being much larger (and ironically the same exact size).



TL;DR We should be seeing stars MUCH bigger than our Sun.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #15 on: September 19, 2016, 12:08:37 PM »
Water below the firmament=oceans, rivers, lakes, etc.

Water above the firmament= clouds.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #16 on: September 19, 2016, 12:13:59 PM »
Look, you're wrong bro. You obvious haven't studied the Bible. All the ancient civilizations including the Hebrews, ancient Greeks, Persians, Egyptians believed the Sky was a Solid Dome and the Earth is Flat.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #17 on: September 19, 2016, 12:14:49 PM »
And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at the Panorama of the Milky Way and see it is not consistent with the Globe model.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #18 on: September 19, 2016, 12:16:30 PM »
Citation please?

I have read the entire Bible And i am a Christian, but I read the hcsb version, and it used "sky" instead of firmament, because that's what the Hebrew world literally translated to.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #19 on: September 19, 2016, 12:23:28 PM »
What part of "in the midst of the waters" do you not understand?

You can't create something "in the midst" of water to "separate water above from water below" without there actually being water above.

Saying the "water above" is clouds would not actually put the "water above" the sky now would it? It would be inside it.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #20 on: September 19, 2016, 12:25:59 PM »
That depends on what you define as the sky. Genesis said that birds flew through the firmament, so the sky is around the height that birds fly. It is certainly an arbitrary definition, which is why you cannot claim it is a tangible object like a sky dome.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

Mainframes

  • 2088
  • +0/-0
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2016, 01:10:32 PM »
The Bible is clear that the Firmament is a Solid Dome (Raqiya) that separates Water Above from Water Below.

Quote
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
Genesis 1:6-8

The Bible is also clear that the Stars are Lights that were placed INSIDE the Firmament to mark the times, seasons and religious festivals. This alone proves universal expansion incorrect because year after year the Stars move according to the seasons and return back where the started. In fact, after 5000 years of reliable historical records and star charts, NONE of the constellations or stars have shifted. The Big Dipper is still the Big Dipper, and Leo is still Leo.



The Visible Arch of the Milky Way Galaxy is an undisputed fact.

The explanation however, is that the curve is due to the spiral of the arm:


But notice how the Sun is not even visible in the diagram and the stars are much bigger than the sun, NOT TO MENTION that GIANT BRIGHT CENTER of the Milky Way that should somehow be visible in the night sky.

This is not consistent with stars all appear to be small and the same size with the Sun and Moon being much larger (and ironically the same exact size).



TL;DR We should be seeing stars MUCH bigger than our Sun.

The word 'solid' or anything remotely connected to solid appears to be lacking in your quote....
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

*

29silhouette

  • 3374
  • +0/-0
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2016, 02:00:43 PM »
And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at the Panorama of the Milky Way and see it is not consistent with the Globe model.
Your do understand what a panorama is right?  When I look up at the Milky Way (the local part of the spiral that we're seeing anyway), it is pretty much straight across the sky.  It's consistent with the globe model.

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3735
  • +9/-7
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #23 on: September 19, 2016, 03:07:53 PM »
Water below the firmament=oceans, rivers, lakes, etc.

Water above the firmament= clouds.

Actually clouds are IN the firmament. What was above was a canopy of water (presumedly ice since its cold up there) that pressurized the atmosphere and came down during the flood. So in a since there was a dome but its not what the flat earthers think.
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3735
  • +9/-7
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #24 on: September 19, 2016, 03:20:51 PM »
The Bible is clear that the Firmament is a Solid Dome (Raqiya) that separates Water Above from Water Below.

Actually no and this is where I would actually need FalseProphet to explain better. You can look at the explanation in a thread I made which at the moment I forgot the title because it hasn't been updated.

Quote
Quote
And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
Genesis 1:6-8

The waters above is the canopy that fell during the flood.

Quote
The Bible is also clear that the Stars are Lights that were placed INSIDE the Firmament to mark the times, seasons and religious festivals. This alone proves universal expansion incorrect because year after year the Stars move according to the seasons and return back where the started. In fact, after 5000 years of reliable historical records and star charts, NONE of the constellations or stars have shifted. The Big Dipper is still the Big Dipper, and Leo is still Leo.

The firmament can include space as well. After all God did called the firmament heaven.

Quote


The Visible Arch of the Milky Way Galaxy is an undisputed fact.

Until you get a non distorted picture where the arms are actually straight.

Quote
The explanation however, is that the curve is due to the spiral of the arm:


But notice how the Sun is not even visible in the diagram and the stars are much bigger than the sun, NOT TO MENTION that GIANT BRIGHT CENTER of the Milky Way that should somehow be visible in the night sky.

The sun would be tiny in that picture. Also we are in a position where we wouldn't see the massive center anyway.

Quote
This is not consistent with stars all appear to be small and the same size with the Sun and Moon being much larger (and ironically the same exact size).

The sun and moon are a whole lot closer than the stars.

Quote


TL;DR We should be seeing stars MUCH bigger than our Sun.

Why?
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #25 on: September 19, 2016, 05:51:28 PM »
Let's just say" the Bible was not meant to explain the geology of earth"  and leave it at that.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #26 on: September 19, 2016, 06:00:11 PM »
Add the fact that NEVER has two arms of the Milky Way been photographed, observed or noted EVER. Not by airplane, observatory, satellite, spaceship, NOTHING.

We are located in between two arms, there should be two arms visible SOMEWHERE.

Also, the proportions on the length of the Milky Way Panorama is WAY OFF from the diagram of the Milky Way Galaxy which shows the Sun to be smaller than the stars. The length of the arm should never appear curved and should almost appear nearly straight at all angles.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #27 on: September 19, 2016, 06:05:42 PM »
Quote
Your do understand what a panorama is right?  When I look up at the Milky Way (the local part of the spiral that we're seeing anyway), it is pretty much straight across the sky.  It's consistent with the globe model.

I can see the Milky Way on a clear night, every night at midnight, and the obvious curve led me to create this thread.

Other people notice the curve too which is why i am not the first one to bring it up on the internet.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #28 on: September 19, 2016, 07:51:22 PM »
They figured out the galaxies shape by plotting the distances of thousands of stars all around us. And measuring the density of stars to angular space taken up to come up with the shape and approximate location of the solar system in the milky way.

Also, we can look at similar galaxies (Andromeda, pinwheel,etc) and the shape of the estimated milky way matches with them, which is further evidence of its shape.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: What more proof do you need?
« Reply #29 on: September 22, 2016, 10:01:30 AM »
Like I already said, it's obvious none of you have read or studied the Bible fully.

Quote
Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens.
Psalm 148:4

This was written by King David AFTER Noah's Flood, so you can't say the Firmament was destroyed in the flood.

Other translations use "Praise Him, highest heavens" which cannot be the clouds which are definitely not in the "highest heavens" or "heavens of heavens".
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.