Enlighten me. Gauss' Easter formula applied to chronology:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=67723.msg1814080#msg1814080Now please tell me: why are they called neutrinos and do they exist?A subquark is composed of strings of bosons and antibosons. A boson = a neutrino = a photon and does have mass.
Let us remember that in one extension to the Standard Model, left- and right-handed neutrinos exist. These Dirac neutrinos acquire mass via the Higgs mechanism but right-handed neutrinos interact much more weakly than any other particles.
Aspden calls the neutrino ‘a figment of the imagination invented in order to make the books balance’ and says that it simply denotes ‘the capacity of the aether to absorb energy and momentum’.
I don't have a lot to add, except, again, not a scientist but everything that comes up when I search about this Allais paradox is that, the equipment today is much more precise and less prone to error. CONFIRMATION OF THE ALLAIS EFFECT DURING THE 2003 SOLAR ECLIPSE:
http://www.acad.ro/sectii2002/proceedings/doc3_2004/03_Mihaila.pdf(it also shows that the effect was confirmed during the August 1999 solar eclipse)
CONFIRMATION OF THE ALLAIS EFFECT DURING THE SEPT. 2006 SOLAR ECLIPSE:
http://www.hessdalen.org/sse/program/Articol.pdfCONFIRMATION OF THE ALLAIS EFFECT DURING THE 2008 SOLAR ECLIPSE:
http://stoner.phys.uaic.ro/jarp/index.php/jarp/article/viewFile/40/22Given the above, the authors consider that
it is an inescapable conclusion from our experiments that after the end of the visible eclipse, as the Moon departed the angular vicinity of the Sun, some influence exerted itself upon the Eastern European region containing our three sets of equipment, extending over a field at least hundreds of kilometers in width. The nature of this common influence is unknown, but plainly it cannot be considered as gravitational in the usually accepted sense of Newtonian or Einsteinian gravitation. Dr. Maurice Allais:
“… the current theory of gravitation (being the result of the application, within the current theory of relative motions, of the principles of inertia and universal gravitation to any one of the Galilean spaces) complemented or not by the corrections suggested by the theory of relativity, leads to orders of magnitude [many factors of ten] for lunar and solar action (which are strictly not to be perceived experimentally) of some 100 million times less than the effects noted [during the eclipse] ... [emphasis added].”
In other words, the pendulum motions Allais observed during his two eclipses – 1954 and 1959 -- were physically IMPOSSIBLE … according to all known “textbook physics!”
Dr. Erwin Saxl, "1970 Solar Eclipse as 'Seen' by a Torsion Pendulum"
Saxl and Allen went on to note that to explain these remarkable eclipse observations, according to "conventional Newtonian/Einsteinian gravitational theory," an increase in the weight of the pendumum bob itself on the order of ~5% would be required ... amounting to (for the ~51.5-lb pendulum bob in the experiment) an increase of ~2.64 lbs!
This would be on the order of one hundred thousand (100,000) times greater than any possible "gravitational tidal effects" Saxl and Allen calculated (using Newtonian Gravitational Theory/ Relativity Theory) for even the 180-degree, "opposite" alignment of the sun and moon ... which, as previously noted, was also directly measured via the torsion pendulum (dasned green line - above) two weeks after the March 7 eclipse!
HERE ARE THE PRECISE CALCULATIONS INVOLVING THE ALLAIS EFFECT:
Dr. Maurice Allais:
In both cases, with the experiments with the anisotropic
support and with those with the isotropic support, it is found
that the amplitudes of the periodic effects are considerably
greater than those calculated according to the law of gravitation,
whether or not completed by the theory of relativity.
In the case of the anisotropic support, the amplitude of
the luni-solar component of 24h 50m is about twenty million
times greater than the amplitude calculated by the theory of
universal gravitation.
In the case of the paraconical pendulum with isotropic
support, this relation is about a hundred million.
I asked why your 'slightly transparent extra celestial body' doesn't block out the lights of other stars.And you did receive the answer: it has everything to do with the DISTANCE involved.
In the first case, the Shadow Moon passes exactly in front of the Moon, perhaps less than a few hundred meters; as such, the radiation emitted by the Moon is picked up by the Shadow Moon, and its form can be seen, but only as it passes in front of the Moon.
The stars orbit much farther above: perhaps some 20-25 more kilometers in altitude. Their radiation is not nearly strong enough to make the Shadow Moon manifest itself.
Moreover, both the Black Sun and the Shadow Moon orbit at a low altitude beyond the Dome, and only cross the sky to cause the solar or the lunar eclipse (respectively).
Here is the orbit of the Black Sun described in the book of Enoch:
Enoch Chapter 23
Enoch 23:1 From there I went to another place, towards the west, unto the extremities of the earth.
Enoch 23:2 Where I beheld a fire blazing and running along without cessation, which intermitted its course neither by day nor by night; but continued always the same.
Enoch 23:3 I inquired, saying, What is this, which never ceases?
Enoch 23:4 Then Raguel, one of the holy angels who were with me, answered,
Enoch 23:5 And said, This blazing fire, which you behold running towards the west, is that of all the luminaries of heaven.
Fire = continuous emission of laevorotatory subquarks
All experts on geology must ask themselves this question: how did the elements of the periodic table come into existence?
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=55861.0https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=55861.msg1393324#msg1393324 (Helium gap 5 paradox)
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=55861.msg1393326#msg1393326 (Helium flash paradox/triple alpha process paradox)