Jane for mod?

  • 9 Replies
  • 1166 Views
Jane for mod?
« on: September 15, 2016, 07:49:39 AM »
If anybody deserves is, it's her. Anybody else agree?
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28354
Re: Jane for mod?
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2016, 08:00:22 AM »
No I don't agree. She had it not too long ago and abused it. She is a globalist and was biased in favour of globalists.
I like Jane but not as a moderator.

*

Crouton

  • Flat Earth Inspector General of High Fashion Crimes and Misdemeanors
  • Planar Moderator
  • 14183
  • Intelligence Officer
Re: Jane for mod?
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2016, 11:08:07 AM »
Somebody reasonable and mentally stable as a mod?  I think not.

I cast my vote for Initkam.
Intelligentia et magnanimitas vincvnt violentiam et desperationem.
The truth behind NASA's budget

Re: Jane for mod?
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2016, 02:05:20 PM »
It would be hard for him to do his job, given that he has half the members on his ignore list. I propose to leave the spot empty. It's not like the debate forums are that well taken care of, anyway.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 20749
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Jane for mod?
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2016, 02:19:11 PM »
I cast my vote for Initkam.

Ignored as disrespecting for topic and words.

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11798
Re: Jane for mod?
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2016, 02:45:08 PM »
Jane was a mod for a day or two, IDK what happened to her. Legba for mod.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

*

Crouton

  • Flat Earth Inspector General of High Fashion Crimes and Misdemeanors
  • Planar Moderator
  • 14183
  • Intelligence Officer
Re: Jane for mod?
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2016, 06:48:53 PM »
It would be hard for him to do his job, given that he has half the members on his ignore list. I propose to leave the spot empty. It's not like the debate forums are that well taken care of, anyway.

That's a good point. Come to think of it I think I'm on his ignore list so he probably can't even see this.

There's only one thing left to do then, throw my own hat into the ring.

As moderator I pledge to hold irrational grudges, openly feud with the sites owners and disappear for weeks at a time only to reappear with excuses that insult everyone's intelligence.

So if you want a moderator who's willing to hear all sides out, make meaningful contributions to a topic and has a formal education vote for Jane.

But if you want a moderator who posts ridiculous jibberish while high on ambien and then goes powermad banning everyone who calls him out on it, vote for me.
Intelligentia et magnanimitas vincvnt violentiam et desperationem.
The truth behind NASA's budget

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 16884
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Jane for mod?
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2016, 09:33:30 PM »
She was a mod and no longer wishes to be. Also we are looking for flat mods usually - though Jane is an example of a globularist that I respect enough to think she would be a great choice.
Quantum Ab Hoc

Re: Jane for mod?
« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2016, 09:49:31 AM »
just to add, I'd be happy with her as a mod.. she's reasonable

the more important factor is removing Ski and Jroa as mods, they've no respect for anyone, they derail threads, post unrelated comments in threads and abuse people..

or is that in the list of skills needed?

edit: also, neither Ski or Jroa have enough knowledge on the subject of flat vs globe

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • Planar Moderator
  • 37834
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Jane for mod?
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2016, 07:25:45 AM »
It is jroa.  Is that really so hard to type?