"You ask "Exactly why does nobody know why the magnetic south pole shifts so much and the north does not?" Who says "nobody knows"? I don't, so what?
The fact is that the location of the south magnetic pole in 2007 was 64.497° S, 137.684° E. Where it wanders to is not my problem and certainly no evidence of a flat earth!" - Rabinoz
Well, I did not realize you blindly believe in things, just as you accuse those who believe in a flat Earth of doing.
As long as the pole does not wander over your house; I imagine it might be your problem then.
Keep in mind you state ALMOST, NEAR or CLOSE to the poles to prove your point, which I find invalid.
Examine a flat Earth map and one finds the locations stated would indeed receive light simultaneously.
Not on any Flat Earth map I have seen! Mind you whenever we claim something about the Flat Earth map jroa or someone else pipes up and says "but there is no official Flat Earth Map!"
So please show me
your Flat Earth map and if you bothered reading what I said it was
If you really look into the matter the Southern Hemisphere has the almost the same daylight hour patterns as the Northern Hemisphere, just shifted six months.
For example Dublin, Ireland at Lat 53.3498° N has almost exactly the same daylight hours and sun elevations on Dec 21, 2015 as Punta Arenas, Chile at Lat 53.1638° S does on Jun 21, 2016.
I said that and it is true, but actually what I meant (yes, we all make mistakes) to say was:
For example Dublin, Ireland at Lat 53.3498° N has almost exactly the same daylight hours and sun elevations on Jun 21, 2016 as Punta Arenas, Chile at Lat 53.1638° S does on Dec 21, 2015.
The daylight hours
in Dublin on Jun 21, 2016 were 17 hrs 00 mins and
in Punta Arenas on Dec 21, 2015 were 16 hrs 58 mins.
I know these are not Arctic or Antarctic, but Punta Arenas, Chile is the almost the most southern town.
I could have used Longyearbyen, Norway at Lat 78.2232° N, and Byrd Memorial, McMurdo, Antarctica at Lat 77.8478° S with similarly almost identical times and angles, but you might claim that the
Storm Troopers would get you at Byrd Memorial, McMurdo, Antarctica
!
Using "facts" about a pole that you cannot prove exists, or explain its functions, is illogical.
Please note, the poles DO NOT receive six months of darkness OR light.
"Certain astronomical myths die hard. One of these is that the entire Arctic region experiences six months of daylight and six months of darkness."
"This fallacy is repeated in innumerable geography textbooks, as well as travel articles and guides"
Above quoted text is taken from: http://www.livescience.com/32814-arctic-daylight-darkness-myth-equinox.html
Please note, you are wrong! Both poles receive six months of darkness and six months light. Ask anyone that has been to either!
Your quote says "Certain astronomical myths die hard. One of these is that the
entire Arctic region experiences six months of daylight and six months of darkness."
This is quite true, but it says that the fallacy is "the
entire Arctic region experiences six months of daylight and six months of darkness", noy that the poles themselves do not get "six months of daylight and six months of darkness".
You really should
learn to understand what you read! Only the Poles themselves (and a very small region around the poles) gets the full "treatment" of "six months of daylight and six months of darkness".
You do see the problem with
blindly following what you read. You need to evaluate what you read.
The rest of the polar regions gets a progressively shorter period of continuous daylight or night, till on the Arctic and Antarctic Circles there is just one day of "proper" 24 hour daylight or darkness, though a couple of days either side of the of the Solstices it is "close enough".
If you want another little "snippet" of information.
On each equinox, both poles get 24 hour daylight.