Round earthers know the Flat Earth explanations for satellites, space travel, the seasons... Any who can read would know further the DE answers for circumpolar stars, the coriolis force, and the evidence for the model.
They know universal acceleration is laughed at by most flat earthers and only the trolls adhere to it, and they know denpressure is believed in by the tiniest handful.
They know many flat earthers are not religious, they know that many models have more than one pole, they know flat earthers can and do answer all their questions, and they presumably know how to read a sig and click a link to learn a working model. They know as well how to click search.
Why is it, after all that, they feel the need to repeat the same exact questions over and over again?
If you didn't like the answer the first time, you're not going to like it the second time. Are you just going to repeat it until we get sick of answering, and claim victory? I've lost count of how many times I've seen that.
If you didn't understand the answer, repeating the question isn't going to help, you'll need to clarify.
Or maybe you're just here to waste time and you don't actually read the answers you're given, as I have observed many times. In which case, leave.
The funny thing is, round earthers have had all their questions and objections met and answered, and any objective review of the situation will see that. It doesn't happen in every thread because we have lives, we aren't at your beck and call to repeat long explanations at your whim, but a little research will find the answers. The only thing that make sit trickier is round earthers who repeat the questions without searching, or who bring up irrelevant topics in irrelevant threads and mess up any attempt to search.
But all the answers are there, and any round earthers who have been here any length of time will have seen them. Do they repeat those answers, for the benefit of those who asked the question? Or do they lie about it and pretend no flat earther has every considered the issue?
I'll give you one guess.
Your questions are answered.
Take the next step and actually try to learn Flat Earth Theory.
I tried to learn Flat Earth Theory, but it is inconsistent and real life observations contradict it.
If real life is wrong, then FET must be right.
I measured distance to the Moon myself.
FET claims I didn't.
I see shadows of horizon during sunset crawling mountains and tall buildings upward.
Shadow of horizon crawl downward during sunrise.
FET claims there are no shadows of horizon because Sun is still 3000 miles above the ground.
(We are "brainwashed" to see it, it doesn't exist.)
Was it really 3000 miles? We tried to measure and calculate, and Flat Earth Model
offers change in Sun's height from zero to over 4000 miles.
The Sun's height is dependent on observer's latitude.
When we were calculating circumference of Tropic of Capricorn, we've shown it is less than Equator.
Nobody answered how circle with smaller circumference fits around circle with bigger one.
Everyone is trying to give different answer why South Celestial Pole has different stars to rotate around it in different direction.
Nobody is answering how 6250 miles from pole to equator fit as radius of 25000 miles long circle of equator's circumference.
Or why in that case equator isn't 40 000 miles.
All answers about FET are full of discrepancies, and we have to ask same questions again and again,
hoping that some day we will get some consistent answers.
With those types of answers, would you stop asking?