Does ANYONE have ANY evidence that we live on a spinning ball?

Quote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PM

frenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.

Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity.  I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.

I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever.  In fact we're going to the next image.  What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? 

So no pictures of a full moon at noon?

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AM

Quote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PM

frenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.

Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity.  I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.

I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever.  In fact we're going to the next image.  What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? 

So no pictures of a full moon at noon?

None (so far).  I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will do

He is deperate.
He would like to force everyone to believe what Flatties say,
and disregard wat people see around in reality.

He would love to forbid people going to Moon again,
just to prevent any further proof that they were already there.

With so many ongoing projects by space agencies all around the world
space colonization is just a matter of time.

We could let flatties dream while they can, (if they wouldn't drag more naive, vulnerable kids into it).

It won't last long.

Sounds like someone trying to not look like a loser.  Keep it up, and maybe you will convince someone. 

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:52:48 AM

Quote from: Omega on September 01, 2016, 05:48:14 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:27:55 AM

Quote from: SpJunk on September 01, 2016, 05:25:26 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:20:44 AM

So, we can all finally agree that NASA fakes their images?  This is a glorious day!

NASA?

Picture was changed by Silicon.

NASA never enhaces photos?

This is absurd.

Now you use the fact that one nutter changes the shape of the moon to prove that the earth is flat, as evidence that all pictures ever taken from the Earth are faked.

This is totally absurd. Even for FE this is absurd.

I never said it was evidence.  I simply questioned the double standard.

HOW IS THIS A DOUBLE STANDARD?

Guy on FE forum fakes a picture. Unmasked within minutes.

One million pictures of the Earth, live satellite feeds, pictures taken from probes, space ships, the surface of the moon...

All that. Not a shred of evidence that ANY of it is faked.

But somehow this one little petty man on the FE forum with his bad MS pain skills just proves that all those real pictures should be considered fake?

ARE YOU INSANE?

Double standard means that you do not hold one person to the same standards as another.  I am sorry your Google is broke and will try to do all of your internet searches for you from here on out. 

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:41:02 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 05:35:00 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:33:44 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 05:29:26 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:27:55 AM

Quote from: SpJunk on September 01, 2016, 05:25:26 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:20:44 AM

So, we can all finally agree that NASA fakes their images?  This is a glorious day!

NASA?

Picture was changed by Silicon.

NASA never enhaces photos?

Enhance =!= changing to prove an invalid point.

You mean, like when NASA stiches a bunch of pics into a circular shape and you people jump around proclaiming proof of a ball?

Nasa does not use it as a proof for a round earth.

They don't need to prove something that most people believe anyway.

Then why would you blame people for using it as a prove if it doesn't need to be proven in the first place?

You seem to be missing the part where you are the ones trying to prove a point. 

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 06:30:33 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:41:02 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 05:35:00 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:33:44 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 05:29:26 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:27:55 AM

Quote from: SpJunk on September 01, 2016, 05:25:26 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:20:44 AM

So, we can all finally agree that NASA fakes their images?  This is a glorious day!

NASA?

Picture was changed by Silicon.

NASA never enhaces photos?

Enhance =!= changing to prove an invalid point.

You mean, like when NASA stiches a bunch of pics into a circular shape and you people jump around proclaiming proof of a ball?

Nasa does not use it as a proof for a round earth.

They don't need to prove something that most people believe anyway.

Then why would you blame people for using it as a prove if it doesn't need to be proven in the first place?

You seem to be missing the part where you are the ones trying to prove a point. 

We did not manipulate a picture to prove a point. That was the flatties.

Double standard means that you do not hold one person to the same standards as another.  I am sorry your Google is broke and will try to do all of your internet searches for you from here on out.

But the flat head was the one doctoring his picture to provide fake evidence! Badly, I might add!

Are you saying you have evidence that all our pictures taken from space are faked?

I said it before, I have a journalist of the New York Times on speed-dial.

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 07:42:00 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 06:30:33 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:41:02 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 05:35:00 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:33:44 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 05:29:26 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:27:55 AM

Quote from: SpJunk on September 01, 2016, 05:25:26 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 05:20:44 AM

So, we can all finally agree that NASA fakes their images?  This is a glorious day!

NASA?

Picture was changed by Silicon.

NASA never enhaces photos?

Enhance =!= changing to prove an invalid point.

You mean, like when NASA stiches a bunch of pics into a circular shape and you people jump around proclaiming proof of a ball?

Nasa does not use it as a proof for a round earth.

They don't need to prove something that most people believe anyway.

Then why would you blame people for using it as a prove if it doesn't need to be proven in the first place?

You seem to be missing the part where you are the ones trying to prove a point. 

We did not manipulate a picture to prove a point. That was the flatties.

Never ever?  Pinky promise? 

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 07:40:37 AM

Double standard means that you do not hold one person to the same standards as another.  I am sorry your Google is broke and will try to do all of your internet searches for you from here on out.

But the flat head was the one doctoring his picture to provide fake evidence! Badly, I might add!

Are you saying you have evidence that all our pictures taken from space are faked?

I said it before, I have a journalist of the New York Times on speed-dial.

How many faked pictures would shut you up?  I have a little time this afternoon. 

Quote from: Omega on September 01, 2016, 08:00:11 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 07:40:37 AM

Double standard means that you do not hold one person to the same standards as another.  I am sorry your Google is broke and will try to do all of your internet searches for you from here on out.

But the flat head was the one doctoring his picture to provide fake evidence! Badly, I might add!

Are you saying you have evidence that all our pictures taken from space are faked?

I said it before, I have a journalist of the New York Times on speed-dial.

How many faked pictures would shut you up?  I have a little time this afternoon.

Let's start with one.

Quote from: Omega on September 01, 2016, 08:00:11 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 07:40:37 AM

Double standard means that you do not hold one person to the same standards as another.  I am sorry your Google is broke and will try to do all of your internet searches for you from here on out.

But the flat head was the one doctoring his picture to provide fake evidence! Badly, I might add!

Are you saying you have evidence that all our pictures taken from space are faked?

I said it before, I have a journalist of the New York Times on speed-dial.

How many faked pictures would shut you up?  I have a little time this afternoon.

Let's start with one.

Only one?  Well, this will be easy.

Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AM

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AM

Quote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PM

frenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.

Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity.  I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.

I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever.  In fact we're going to the next image.  What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? 

So no pictures of a full moon at noon?

None (so far).  I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will do

Strange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.

Only one?  Well, this will be easy.

Source? What is the context of this picture? Where is it from? Who did the over exposure?

CONTEXT

The person responsible for the manipulation, Emily Lakdawalla, told a forum of excitable theorists that she made the changes because of the way Cassini takes photos.
"Cassini takes colour pictures by snapping three sequential photos through red, green, and blue filters," she said.
"In the time that separated the three frames, Dione moved, so if I did a simple color composite I would be able to make Titan look right, but not Dione; or Dione look right, but not Titan.
"So I aligned Dione, cut it out, and then aligned Titan, and then had to account for the missing bits of shadow where the bits of Dione had been in two of the three channels."


As we have cleared that out, next image please.

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AM

Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AM

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AM

Quote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PM

frenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.

Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity.  I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.

I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever.  In fact we're going to the next image.  What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? 

So no pictures of a full moon at noon?

None (so far).  I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will do

Strange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.

During the daytime?

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 08:17:15 AM

Only one?  Well, this will be easy.

Source? What is the context of this picture? Where is it from? Who did the over exposure?

CONTEXT

Did you not know you can right click and do an image search?

I did so and have given you the quote that explains what can be seen.

Next image.

Quote from: Omega on September 01, 2016, 08:21:42 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 08:17:15 AM

Only one?  Well, this will be easy.

Source? What is the context of this picture? Where is it from? Who did the over exposure?

CONTEXT

Did you not know you can right click and do an image search?

I guess I missed that ON MY TABLET

Next image.

I could do this all day long, but you said one image.  If I give you another, you will simply ask for another.  Who has that much time on their hands? 

I could do this all day long, but you said one image. 

Technically they only said to 'start' with one. You've started with one, now you get to continue.
Hey, you're not the only one who can play around with technicalities.

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 08:45:53 AM

Next image.

I could do this all day long, but you said one image.  If I give you another, you will simply ask for another.  Who has that much time on their hands?

You said you could prove nasa fakes evidence. Now you're saying you can't prove it?

Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 08:21:15 AM

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AM

Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AM

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AM

Quote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PM

frenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.

Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity.  I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.

I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever.  In fact we're going to the next image.  What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? 

So no pictures of a full moon at noon?

None (so far).  I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will do

Strange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.

During the daytime?

No. You didn't say anything about time of day.

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 09:04:27 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 08:45:53 AM

Next image.

I could do this all day long, but you said one image.  If I give you another, you will simply ask for another.  Who has that much time on their hands?

You said you could prove nasa fakes evidence. Now you're saying you can't prove it?

I said I could do it all day long, not that I want to do it all day long.  Funny how words work, right? 

Quote from: Omega on September 01, 2016, 09:10:14 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 09:04:27 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 08:45:53 AM

Next image.

I could do this all day long, but you said one image.  If I give you another, you will simply ask for another.  Who has that much time on their hands?

You said you could prove nasa fakes evidence. Now you're saying you can't prove it?

I said I could do it all day long, not that I want to do it all day long.  Funny how words work, right?

Are you five years old now? "I could if I wanted to, I just do 't want to"

Quote from: Omega on September 01, 2016, 09:10:14 AM

Quote from: jroa on September 01, 2016, 09:04:27 AM

Quote from: User324 on September 01, 2016, 08:45:53 AM

Next image.

I could do this all day long, but you said one image.  If I give you another, you will simply ask for another.  Who has that much time on their hands?

You said you could prove nasa fakes evidence. Now you're saying you can't prove it?

I said I could do it all day long, not that I want to do it all day long.  Funny how words work, right?

So, it is too difficult to prove NASA images are fake. The only one you sent so far was not by NASA. So good job there. How about you give one fake image from NASA.

You people asked for a single picture.  I provided it, and now you insist that I waste my time getting you every single faked picture?  Are you people being serious? 

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 08:34:09 AM

Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 08:21:15 AM

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AM

Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AM

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AM

Quote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PM

frenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.

Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity.  I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.

I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever.  In fact we're going to the next image.  What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? 

So no pictures of a full moon at noon?

None (so far).  I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will do

Strange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.

During the daytime?

No. You didn't say anything about time of day.

Now I see why you asked me that.  Apparently the image in question was taken at 12:00PM on 8/11/2014

@Jroa
I showed that it is no fake so I insist on a fake picture. You have promised a fake picture.

Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 09:16:00 AM

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 08:34:09 AM

Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 08:21:15 AM

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 07:38:32 AM

Quote from: sokarul on September 01, 2016, 07:33:02 AM

Quote from: Silicon on September 01, 2016, 06:27:02 AM

Quote from: TotesReptilian on August 31, 2016, 10:00:57 PM

frenat and origamiscience: I see no evidence of him stretching or otherwise altering the image, except for the outline he overlayed on top. Be careful about false accusations.

Omega, and others, at least one of your round earth counterparts has some dignity.  I would advise that you stop claiming that I faked anything and do some work on your own for a chance, and see for yourself.

I know it hurts when the globe model is wrong and you have to resort to these tactics, but they don't work forever.  In fact we're going to the next image.  What is your excuse for this full moon during the day? 

So no pictures of a full moon at noon?

None (so far).  I think this full moon at 20+ degrees above the horizon will do

Strange, I thought all full moons would make it over 20 degrees.

During the daytime?

No. You didn't say anything about time of day.

Now I see why you asked me that.  Apparently the image in question was taken at 12:00PM on 8/11/2014

One would think you learned your lesson about lying. Guess not.