True Flat Earth Map Distances

I came across the video below that may have a possible explanation for distances on a flat earth.  I thought it was very interesting.  Could using what is outlined here be used to build a close representation of the true flat earth? Thoughts?

I came across the video below that may have a possible explanation for distances on a flat earth.  I thought it was very interesting.  Could using what is outlined here be used to build a close representation of the true flat earth? Thoughts?

You did watch it, I suppose.

What a waste of time! Now the Freemason's and the Illuminati have "brainwashed" us into thinking Nautical Miles and English Miles are different - can someone tell him that they really are different!

And he proposes fixing the Gleason Map by artificially narrowing the Southern Hemisphere continents. I gave up before I found out what he was proposing to do about the massively wrong distances between continents.

Someone should tell him that we know the exact latitudes and longitudes of each location and changing Australia's width will completely wreck all those values.

I think you should watch it carefully and summarise the important points.

Quote from: Silicon on August 20, 2016, 03:31:06 PM

I came across the video below that may have a possible explanation for distances on a flat earth.  I thought it was very interesting.  Could using what is outlined here be used to build a close representation of the true flat earth? Thoughts?

You did watch it, I suppose.

What a waste of time! Now the Freemason's and the Illuminati have "brainwashed" us into thinking Nautical Miles and English Miles are different - can someone tell him that they really are different!

And he proposes fixing the Gleason Map by artificially narrowing the Southern Hemisphere continents. I gave up before I found out what he was proposing to do about the massively wrong distances between continents.

Someone should tell him that we know the exact latitudes and longitudes of each location and changing Australia's width will completely wreck all those values.

I think you should watch it carefully and summarise the important points.

No this is not a waste of time.  Here are some noteworthy points:

1) He uses nautical miles, and Gleason map instead of miles to begin measurements for FE
2) North pole is 0 degrees, south is 180
3) Using measurements from 1 & 2 hes able to predict the speed of the sun, and match up distances perfectly on land from Google Earth (which uses English miles)
4) Using measurements from 1 & 2, Topic of cancer circumference comes out to 25k miles which Globe Earth says is the circumference of the equator
5) He makes an observation that from google earth viewing top down (north pole), only the tropic of cancer is visible at the edge, instead of the equator
6) He makes an observation that the speed of the sun at the tropic of cancer is 1040 mph which of course is suppose to be the speed of the earths rotation at the equator
7) Using 4 & 5 He makes an observation that the entire southern hemisphere of the Globe is possibly folded under the tropic of cancer, and thus distorted.

If he's right, and numbers make sense broadly, then this could be a major step, however undoing the distortion caused in #7 would not be easy. 

Quote from: rabinoz on August 20, 2016, 10:24:12 PM

Quote from: Silicon on August 20, 2016, 03:31:06 PM

I came across the video below that may have a possible explanation for distances on a flat earth.  I thought it was very interesting.  Could using what is outlined here be used to build a close representation of the true flat earth? Thoughts?

You did watch it, I suppose.

What a waste of time! Now the Freemason's and the Illuminati have "brainwashed" us into thinking Nautical Miles and English Miles are different - can someone tell him that they really are different!

And he proposes fixing the Gleason Map by artificially narrowing the Southern Hemisphere continents. I gave up before I found out what he was proposing to do about the massively wrong distances between continents.

Someone should tell him that we know the exact latitudes and longitudes of each location and changing Australia's width will completely wreck all those values.

I think you should watch it carefully and summarise the important points.

No this is not a waste of time.  Here are some noteworthy points:

1) He uses nautical miles, and Gleason map instead of miles to begin measurements for FE
2) North pole is 0 degrees, south is 180
3) Using measurements from 1 & 2 hes able to predict the speed of the sun, and match up distances perfectly on land from Google Earth (which uses English miles)
4) Using measurements from 1 & 2, Topic of cancer circumference comes out to 25k miles which Globe Earth says is the circumference of the equator
5) He makes an observation that from google earth viewing top down (north pole), only the tropic of cancer is visible at the edge, instead of the equator
6) He makes an observation that the speed of the sun at the tropic of cancer is 1040 mph which of course is suppose to be the speed of the earths rotation at the equator
7) Using 4 & 5 He makes an observation that the entire southern hemisphere of the Globe is possibly folded under the tropic of cancer, and thus distorted.

If he's right, and numbers make sense broadly, then this could be a major step, however undoing the distortion caused in #7 would not be easy.

No, all he has done is found that the difference between nautical miles and statute miles "conveniently" explains the error you in scaling East-West distances on the Gleason's map. Nothing more!

Now check the North-South size of the USA using his "nautical miles" and see waht you find.

Now try the same thing out on Australia - that becomes a real laugh! And you cannot simple shrink the East-West size of Australia to make it work because that changes the Longitudes of almost every point is Australia - you simply cannot do that!

Quote from: Silicon on August 21, 2016, 07:11:21 PM

Quote from: rabinoz on August 20, 2016, 10:24:12 PM

Quote from: Silicon on August 20, 2016, 03:31:06 PM

I came across the video below that may have a possible explanation for distances on a flat earth.  I thought it was very interesting.  Could using what is outlined here be used to build a close representation of the true flat earth? Thoughts?

You did watch it, I suppose.

What a waste of time! Now the Freemason's and the Illuminati have "brainwashed" us into thinking Nautical Miles and English Miles are different - can someone tell him that they really are different!

And he proposes fixing the Gleason Map by artificially narrowing the Southern Hemisphere continents. I gave up before I found out what he was proposing to do about the massively wrong distances between continents.

Someone should tell him that we know the exact latitudes and longitudes of each location and changing Australia's width will completely wreck all those values.

I think you should watch it carefully and summarise the important points.

No this is not a waste of time.  Here are some noteworthy points:

1) He uses nautical miles, and Gleason map instead of miles to begin measurements for FE
2) North pole is 0 degrees, south is 180
3) Using measurements from 1 & 2 hes able to predict the speed of the sun, and match up distances perfectly on land from Google Earth (which uses English miles)
4) Using measurements from 1 & 2, Topic of cancer circumference comes out to 25k miles which Globe Earth says is the circumference of the equator
5) He makes an observation that from google earth viewing top down (north pole), only the tropic of cancer is visible at the edge, instead of the equator
6) He makes an observation that the speed of the sun at the tropic of cancer is 1040 mph which of course is suppose to be the speed of the earths rotation at the equator
7) Using 4 & 5 He makes an observation that the entire southern hemisphere of the Globe is possibly folded under the tropic of cancer, and thus distorted.

If he's right, and numbers make sense broadly, then this could be a major step, however undoing the distortion caused in #7 would not be easy.

Now try the same thing out on Australia - that becomes a real laugh! And you cannot simple shrink the East-West size of Australia to make it work because that changes the Longitudes of almost every point is Australia - you simply cannot do that!

Why not? Maybe they need to change.

Quote from: rabinoz on August 21, 2016, 08:49:58 PM

Quote from: Silicon on August 21, 2016, 07:11:21 PM

Quote from: rabinoz on August 20, 2016, 10:24:12 PM

Quote from: Silicon on August 20, 2016, 03:31:06 PM

I came across the video below that may have a possible explanation for distances on a flat earth.  I thought it was very interesting.  Could using what is outlined here be used to build a close representation of the true flat earth? Thoughts?

You did watch it, I suppose.

What a waste of time! Now the Freemason's and the Illuminati have "brainwashed" us into thinking Nautical Miles and English Miles are different - can someone tell him that they really are different!

And he proposes fixing the Gleason Map by artificially narrowing the Southern Hemisphere continents. I gave up before I found out what he was proposing to do about the massively wrong distances between continents.

Someone should tell him that we know the exact latitudes and longitudes of each location and changing Australia's width will completely wreck all those values.

I think you should watch it carefully and summarise the important points.

No this is not a waste of time.  Here are some noteworthy points:

1) He uses nautical miles, and Gleason map instead of miles to begin measurements for FE
2) North pole is 0 degrees, south is 180
3) Using measurements from 1 & 2 hes able to predict the speed of the sun, and match up distances perfectly on land from Google Earth (which uses English miles)
4) Using measurements from 1 & 2, Topic of cancer circumference comes out to 25k miles which Globe Earth says is the circumference of the equator
5) He makes an observation that from google earth viewing top down (north pole), only the tropic of cancer is visible at the edge, instead of the equator
6) He makes an observation that the speed of the sun at the tropic of cancer is 1040 mph which of course is suppose to be the speed of the earths rotation at the equator
7) Using 4 & 5 He makes an observation that the entire southern hemisphere of the Globe is possibly folded under the tropic of cancer, and thus distorted.

If he's right, and numbers make sense broadly, then this could be a major step, however undoing the distortion caused in #7 would not be easy.

Now try the same thing out on Australia - that becomes a real laugh! And you cannot simple shrink the East-West size of Australia to make it work because that changes the Longitudes of almost every point is Australia - you simply cannot do that!

Why not? Maybe they need to change.

I was thinking its because the world is a spheroid but I suppose it's possible everyone has somehow gotten the dimensions of everything in the southern hemisphere wildly wrong while at the same time all the pilots, passengers and sailor haven't really noticed.

You sound pretty confident that you have something of substance here.  Give it a shot.  Everyone's been asking for an accurate map of the flat earth for quite a while.  Get in touch with Initkam, I think he's working on a similar project.

Just too much

Do these retarded halfwits even realise they need to put the equator on the flat map as a straight line??

 

...need to put the equator on the flat map as a straight line??

Why is that?  At the immense scale of the whole world, the amount of left-right curvature they propose would be just as imperceptable to the eye as is the very small amount of tilt-away that must exist in far away buildings on a round earth.