Daft Punk aren't actually that good.

  • 14 Replies
  • 4038 Views
*

daftpunk

  • 44
  • hi i'm Joe
Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« on: June 16, 2016, 02:55:10 PM »
I don't know why I set my username as daftpunk. M83 are actually much better.

Does anyone actually like Daft Punk?
love from joe

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 49765
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2016, 03:04:12 PM »
I like their name!
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2016, 04:42:30 PM »
I don't know why I set my username as daftpunk. M83 are actually much better.

Does anyone actually like Daft Punk?


Blue is a better color than red.
Does anyone actually like red?

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 49765
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2016, 04:50:40 PM »
I don't know why I set my username as daftpunk. M83 are actually much better.

Does anyone actually like Daft Punk?


Blue is a better color than red.
Does anyone actually like red?

Commie penguins love red, imo.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

daftpunk

  • 44
  • hi i'm Joe
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2016, 03:02:38 AM »
I don't know why I set my username as daftpunk. M83 are actually much better.

Does anyone actually like Daft Punk?


Blue is a better color than red.
Does anyone actually like red?

How good a colour is is subjective. Daft Punk is objectively terrible. I genuinely wonder if anyone actually likes them.
love from joe

Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2016, 08:26:55 AM »
They used to be good, now they are shit.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

Conker

  • 1557
  • Official FES jerk / kneebiter
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2016, 08:52:36 AM »
I kinda like them. House groups tend to output a lot of shit among a couple dozen diamonds, tho. You have to sort them out. And before you say it, RAM is not bad at all.
This is not a joke society.
Quote from: OpenedEyes
You shouldn't be allowed to talk on a free discussion forum.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2016, 03:35:50 AM »
I don't know why I set my username as daftpunk. M83 are actually much better.

Does anyone actually like Daft Punk?


Blue is a better color than red.
Does anyone actually like red?

How good a colour is is subjective. Daft Punk is objectively terrible. I genuinely wonder if anyone actually likes them.


Rossini is awesome, Stravinsky is not. That is subjective.

I don't know what Daft Punk are. Also, I don't care.

Did Daft Punk piss you off or something?



*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 49765
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2016, 09:12:52 AM »
Daft Punk are robotkin who play dance music.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Conker

  • 1557
  • Official FES jerk / kneebiter
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #9 on: July 02, 2016, 06:36:43 PM »
Old Daft Punk is weird technoish, but they have a lot of well known "clasics".
New one has gone through the recent french-dance tendency to take a shit ton of influence from 70s disco music.
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
And a fan version, one of youtube's most famous videos (62M views, and in full 144p quality)
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
(Paul Williams is the new David Bowie?)
Its almost impossible that you don't know a single song by them.

Im personally glad they stopped pumping out raveish repetitive music. Its not the 90s anymore. People dont listen to them on LSD anymore, people listen to dance on their computers. Try listening to Homework for an hour. Then try listening to Discovery. Your ears will note the difference. And, yes, Human After All was after Discovery. Please note the ammount of anoying songs in RAM. They managed to do an experimental album (for some reason people thought it was going to be Discovery 2?), and not make it into
" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
This is not a joke society.
Quote from: OpenedEyes
You shouldn't be allowed to talk on a free discussion forum.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2016, 04:08:59 AM »
#9, #9, #9, #9, #9 . . .

Just discovered my new laptop plays stereo.   ;D



*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42529
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #11 on: July 09, 2016, 08:24:08 AM »
I don't know why I set my username as daftpunk.
Maybe because you're an idiot?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13149
  • swiggity swooty
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2016, 08:24:42 PM »
Their helmets are cool. That's about it.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

*

Denspressure

  • 1947
  • What do you, value?
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #13 on: August 29, 2016, 07:42:14 AM »
Their helmets are cool. That's about it.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

How dare you!
):

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13149
  • swiggity swooty
Re: Daft Punk aren't actually that good.
« Reply #14 on: August 29, 2016, 08:35:13 PM »
I dare easily!