Youre getting ahead of yourself.
Stick to the basics.
Diagram.
House.
Atmosphere.
How does it go through the roof?
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=71053.msg2093612#msg2093612
Amazingly it takes a little while to explain a model from scratch. Spamming the most basic thing in such a patronising manner doesn't achieve anything. Short version, imagine stacking some balls in a pyramid shape, then sliding a thin sheet in the middle of that pyramid between the balls, horizontally. The shape below does not change. That's my understanding at least.
The question, then, should be what causes that structure and why it acts to cause gravity. The two are equivalent questions. Go learn the model and come back rather than expecting Scepti to do all the work.
i am patronizing because his use of language is arrogant and patronizing.
"think about it" and "it's obivous to see" as he likes to say.
and amazingly we've all understood the basic concept, ffs.
it's his basic concept makes no sense.
but it's his theory.
he should have done the work by now.
he's had long enough to provide the simplest basic diagram.
did you see his diagram from a few weeks ago?!?!?!?!
amazingly let's take your comment.
"you slide a thin sheet of paper in between".
let's say that this sheet is actually a super rigid piece of steel.
let's take the sheet and slide it vertically.
we all understand the balls will apply a pressure sideways onto the sheet.
as per std universe pressure.
let's slide the sheet horizontally.
then remove the balls directly beneath the center of the sheet.
it's still rigid enough to support the "stack" above.
so...then what?
how do things below the sheet get pushed down?
let's make the sheet a box or cylinder - like scuba gear or a vaccum chamber.
objects inside can weigh the same as they always do, regardless of pressure changes.
according to him - vaccuuum chambers are fakenews.
you're really going to support this tinfoil hat theory?
let's talk about rockets.
he claims if rocket flys straight up.
and only straight up, he'll create a stacked spring of molecules of air that will compress and bounce the rocket back to earth.
the molecules aren't free flowing if a rocket flies straight up "plumb".
apparently fluids don't flow and if i jumped from a high enough building "plumb" down, i could stack the air against myself and come to a stop when i've achieved consistnet speed "max thrust" aka terminal veloctiy.
does that make sense?
or in the most basic sense, things don't fall at a predictable rate of 9.8m/s/s.
basic measurable phenomenon of things falling...don't exist.
right......
there
amazingly disproven.
draw it out.
come on jane.
the theory is the theory.
that's fine.
he has a theory.
but attempting to defend it is ridiculous.
it has no merit.