Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)

  • 3822 Replies
  • 824211 Views
*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1770 on: September 12, 2016, 03:26:39 PM »
Trolls trolling trolls. Pathetic, really. Jroa attempts to derail yet another thread.

Tell me, Mr. Moderator, what does any of this have to do with denpressure?

Are you calling me a troll?

Not really. You just fell for his bait, further derailing the thread.

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1771 on: September 12, 2016, 03:27:20 PM »
I wonder why sokarul insists on being the angriest noob ever?  Is that the only thing he thinks he can be proud of in his sad life?

Sokarul seems a happy and well balanced person to me and pretty intelligent to go with it.   If I think about you and I just cannot understand what motivates you to behave the way you do.    Perhaps you can explain to me how you get so much joy out of being here?
I just enjoy being right.  Well, that and making you angry noobs look bad by proving you wrong.  What is your excuse?

The experience of being here is totally horrible and it does say something about my life that i would be here.

People here are so unrelentingly stupid it is just soul destroying to observe it.  I just cannot begin to understand how people can be so stupid.   It is sort of like a terrible horror movie that I have started so might as well keep on watching



Your life is so sad.  I feel for you, bro.   :'(

You do not even make the slightest attempt to be right apart from on very rare occasions where for example you pointed out trigonometry was not as hard as i was making it out to be.  That was a rare glimse that you are capable of normal behaviour.  The rest of the time you are one of the strangest people on this forum

I love it when I prove you to be wrong, and you pretend that it never happened.  Does it make you feel secure to be in denial, or do you just have a chuckle at our expense?

To my knowledge in about 50 encounters i have had with you your maths response was the only time you have come anywhere near close to proving me wrong.  I have not until now considered that you do not realise you are lying but I suppose I should allow that possibility.

Sounds to me what a coward running from a fight would say.  Have you always run from confrontations, or is this your greatest moment?

Seems to me that no matter what I say you are going to respond with some sort of shit for brains comment where you have some need to appear bigger than you really are.  What have you been right about in the last two weeks?

I am sorry that your world is collapsing around you as you learn the truth.  I would be mad and angry as well if I was first learning about the deception that was perpetrated on humanity.

Why do you bother to behave like this?   it just makes you look very very silly

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1772 on: September 12, 2016, 03:28:00 PM »
Trolls trolling trolls. Pathetic, really. Jroa attempts to derail yet another thread.

Tell me, Mr. Moderator, what does any of this have to do with denpressure?

Are you calling me a troll?

Not really. You just fell for his bait, further derailing the thread.

derailing this thread?

come on

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1773 on: September 12, 2016, 03:32:28 PM »
Trolls trolling trolls. Pathetic, really. Jroa attempts to derail yet another thread.

Tell me, Mr. Moderator, what does any of this have to do with denpressure?

Are you calling me a troll?

Not really. You just fell for his bait, further derailing the thread.

derailing this thread?

come on

Good point.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1774 on: September 12, 2016, 03:37:10 PM »
I wonder why sokarul insists on being the angriest noob ever?  Is that the only thing he thinks he can be proud of in his sad life?

Sokarul seems a happy and well balanced person to me and pretty intelligent to go with it.   If I think about you and I just cannot understand what motivates you to behave the way you do.    Perhaps you can explain to me how you get so much joy out of being here?
I just enjoy being right.  Well, that and making you angry noobs look bad by proving you wrong.  What is your excuse?

The experience of being here is totally horrible and it does say something about my life that i would be here.

People here are so unrelentingly stupid it is just soul destroying to observe it.  I just cannot begin to understand how people can be so stupid.   It is sort of like a terrible horror movie that I have started so might as well keep on watching



Your life is so sad.  I feel for you, bro.   :'(

You do not even make the slightest attempt to be right apart from on very rare occasions where for example you pointed out trigonometry was not as hard as i was making it out to be.  That was a rare glimse that you are capable of normal behaviour.  The rest of the time you are one of the strangest people on this forum

I love it when I prove you to be wrong, and you pretend that it never happened.  Does it make you feel secure to be in denial, or do you just have a chuckle at our expense?

To my knowledge in about 50 encounters i have had with you your maths response was the only time you have come anywhere near close to proving me wrong.  I have not until now considered that you do not realise you are lying but I suppose I should allow that possibility.

Sounds to me what a coward running from a fight would say.  Have you always run from confrontations, or is this your greatest moment?

Seems to me that no matter what I say you are going to respond with some sort of shit for brains comment where you have some need to appear bigger than you really are.  What have you been right about in the last two weeks?

I am sorry that your world is collapsing around you as you learn the truth.  I would be mad and angry as well if I was first learning about the deception that was perpetrated on humanity.

Why do you bother to behave like this?   it just makes you look very very silly

Why do you feel so high and might as to think that I care what you or the other roundies think about me?  God complex much? 

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Planar Moderator
  • 52381
  • +99/-95
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1775 on: September 12, 2016, 03:45:48 PM »

The experience of being here is totally horrible and it does say something about my life that i would be here.

Dude... you don't have to hang out here at all. OR you could stop being so angry at us. You may need to jiggle the stick that's jammed up your bum!
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1776 on: September 12, 2016, 04:03:24 PM »
I wonder why sokarul insists on being the angriest noob ever?  Is that the only thing he thinks he can be proud of in his sad life?

Sokarul seems a happy and well balanced person to me and pretty intelligent to go with it.   If I think about you and I just cannot understand what motivates you to behave the way you do.    Perhaps you can explain to me how you get so much joy out of being here?
I just enjoy being right.  Well, that and making you angry noobs look bad by proving you wrong.  What is your excuse?

The experience of being here is totally horrible and it does say something about my life that i would be here.

People here are so unrelentingly stupid it is just soul destroying to observe it.  I just cannot begin to understand how people can be so stupid.   It is sort of like a terrible horror movie that I have started so might as well keep on watching



Your life is so sad.  I feel for you, bro.   :'(

You do not even make the slightest attempt to be right apart from on very rare occasions where for example you pointed out trigonometry was not as hard as i was making it out to be.  That was a rare glimse that you are capable of normal behaviour.  The rest of the time you are one of the strangest people on this forum

I love it when I prove you to be wrong, and you pretend that it never happened.  Does it make you feel secure to be in denial, or do you just have a chuckle at our expense?

To my knowledge in about 50 encounters i have had with you your maths response was the only time you have come anywhere near close to proving me wrong.  I have not until now considered that you do not realise you are lying but I suppose I should allow that possibility.

Sounds to me what a coward running from a fight would say.  Have you always run from confrontations, or is this your greatest moment?

Seems to me that no matter what I say you are going to respond with some sort of shit for brains comment where you have some need to appear bigger than you really are.  What have you been right about in the last two weeks?

I am sorry that your world is collapsing around you as you learn the truth.  I would be mad and angry as well if I was first learning about the deception that was perpetrated on humanity.

Why do you bother to behave like this?   it just makes you look very very silly

Why do you feel so high and might as to think that I care what you or the other roundies think about me?  God complex much?

Another strange response.  I never suggested for a single moment that you care what I think.  I was saying when you behave in such a childish manner in such a totally transparent manner what do you expect to achieve?

You said this:

>>I am sorry that your world is collapsing around you as you learn the truth.  I would be mad and angry as well if I was first learning about the deception that was perpetrated on humanity.

Only the most brain washed or stupid person can imagine the world is flat.  It has to be the most stupid idea going around at the moment so obviously I am not going to be thinking like you are claiming in any way shape or form ever.    And yet stupidly you type that out.  I just do not understand why you would say such a thing to me.   

Then there is all the repetitions about your claim i am running away from a fight.   What fight?  I obviously think you are ridiculous or sick.  How can there be anything to run away from other than the horror of what i am witnessing where you seem proud to behave the way you do.


*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1777 on: September 12, 2016, 04:07:00 PM »
I wonder why sokarul insists on being the angriest noob ever?  Is that the only thing he thinks he can be proud of in his sad life?

Sokarul seems a happy and well balanced person to me and pretty intelligent to go with it.   If I think about you and I just cannot understand what motivates you to behave the way you do.    Perhaps you can explain to me how you get so much joy out of being here?
I just enjoy being right.  Well, that and making you angry noobs look bad by proving you wrong.  What is your excuse?

The experience of being here is totally horrible and it does say something about my life that i would be here.

People here are so unrelentingly stupid it is just soul destroying to observe it.  I just cannot begin to understand how people can be so stupid.   It is sort of like a terrible horror movie that I have started so might as well keep on watching



Your life is so sad.  I feel for you, bro.   :'(

You do not even make the slightest attempt to be right apart from on very rare occasions where for example you pointed out trigonometry was not as hard as i was making it out to be.  That was a rare glimse that you are capable of normal behaviour.  The rest of the time you are one of the strangest people on this forum

I love it when I prove you to be wrong, and you pretend that it never happened.  Does it make you feel secure to be in denial, or do you just have a chuckle at our expense?

To my knowledge in about 50 encounters i have had with you your maths response was the only time you have come anywhere near close to proving me wrong.  I have not until now considered that you do not realise you are lying but I suppose I should allow that possibility.

Sounds to me what a coward running from a fight would say.  Have you always run from confrontations, or is this your greatest moment?

Seems to me that no matter what I say you are going to respond with some sort of shit for brains comment where you have some need to appear bigger than you really are.  What have you been right about in the last two weeks?

I am sorry that your world is collapsing around you as you learn the truth.  I would be mad and angry as well if I was first learning about the deception that was perpetrated on humanity.

Why do you bother to behave like this?   it just makes you look very very silly

Why do you feel so high and might as to think that I care what you or the other roundies think about me?  God complex much?

Another strange response.  I never suggested for a single moment that you care what I think.  I was saying when you behave in such a childish manner in such a totally transparent manner what do you expect to achieve?

You said this:

>>I am sorry that your world is collapsing around you as you learn the truth.  I would be mad and angry as well if I was first learning about the deception that was perpetrated on humanity.

Only the most brain washed or stupid person can imagine the world is flat.  It has to be the most stupid idea going around at the moment so obviously I am not going to be thinking like you are claiming in any way shape or form ever.    And yet stupidly you type that out.  I just do not understand why you would say such a thing to me.   

Then there is all the repetitions about your claim i am running away from a fight.   What fight?  I obviously think you are ridiculous or sick.  How can there be anything to run away from other than the horror of what i am witnessing where you seem proud to behave the way you do.



I understand that insulting people is your way of venting your frustration and anger about learning that you have been lied to your entire life.  I do not take offense to your words.  In fact, I am glad that you are venting!  I do not want for you to have pent up anger and end up having a stroke or something.  I will be your punching bag.  Bring it on!  Call me a poopoo head next. 

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1778 on: September 12, 2016, 04:09:45 PM »
I wonder why sokarul insists on being the angriest noob ever?  Is that the only thing he thinks he can be proud of in his sad life?

Sokarul seems a happy and well balanced person to me and pretty intelligent to go with it.   If I think about you and I just cannot understand what motivates you to behave the way you do.    Perhaps you can explain to me how you get so much joy out of being here?
I just enjoy being right.  Well, that and making you angry noobs look bad by proving you wrong.  What is your excuse?

The experience of being here is totally horrible and it does say something about my life that i would be here.

People here are so unrelentingly stupid it is just soul destroying to observe it.  I just cannot begin to understand how people can be so stupid.   It is sort of like a terrible horror movie that I have started so might as well keep on watching



Your life is so sad.  I feel for you, bro.   :'(

You do not even make the slightest attempt to be right apart from on very rare occasions where for example you pointed out trigonometry was not as hard as i was making it out to be.  That was a rare glimse that you are capable of normal behaviour.  The rest of the time you are one of the strangest people on this forum

I love it when I prove you to be wrong, and you pretend that it never happened.  Does it make you feel secure to be in denial, or do you just have a chuckle at our expense?

To my knowledge in about 50 encounters i have had with you your maths response was the only time you have come anywhere near close to proving me wrong.  I have not until now considered that you do not realise you are lying but I suppose I should allow that possibility.

Sounds to me what a coward running from a fight would say.  Have you always run from confrontations, or is this your greatest moment?

Seems to me that no matter what I say you are going to respond with some sort of shit for brains comment where you have some need to appear bigger than you really are.  What have you been right about in the last two weeks?

I am sorry that your world is collapsing around you as you learn the truth.  I would be mad and angry as well if I was first learning about the deception that was perpetrated on humanity.

Why do you bother to behave like this?   it just makes you look very very silly

Why do you feel so high and might as to think that I care what you or the other roundies think about me?  God complex much?

Another strange response.  I never suggested for a single moment that you care what I think.  I was saying when you behave in such a childish manner in such a totally transparent manner what do you expect to achieve?

You said this:

>>I am sorry that your world is collapsing around you as you learn the truth.  I would be mad and angry as well if I was first learning about the deception that was perpetrated on humanity.

Only the most brain washed or stupid person can imagine the world is flat.  It has to be the most stupid idea going around at the moment so obviously I am not going to be thinking like you are claiming in any way shape or form ever.    And yet stupidly you type that out.  I just do not understand why you would say such a thing to me.   

Then there is all the repetitions about your claim i am running away from a fight.   What fight?  I obviously think you are ridiculous or sick.  How can there be anything to run away from other than the horror of what i am witnessing where you seem proud to behave the way you do.



I understand that insulting people is your way of venting your frustration and anger about learning that you have been lied to your entire life.  I do not take offense to your words.  In fact, I am glad that you are venting!  I do not want for you to have pent up anger and end up having a stroke or something.  I will be your punching bag.  Bring it on!  Call me a poopoo head next.

I am tired of this sillyness.  Good night

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1779 on: September 12, 2016, 04:20:15 PM »
Another win for the FE!

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1780 on: September 12, 2016, 04:22:07 PM »
Another win for the FE!

You only succeeded in derailing the thread with your trolling. What a great moderator....

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1781 on: September 12, 2016, 04:25:41 PM »
Another win for the FE!

You only succeeded in derailing the thread with your trolling. What a great moderator....

Do you need a kleenex?  I am sorry that I make you cry so much, but you don't have to cry yourself to sleep every night. 

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11852
  • +10/-5
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1782 on: September 12, 2016, 07:38:48 PM »
Another win for the FE!
Another vote for,

                JROA FOR MOD!!!
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1783 on: September 12, 2016, 07:42:22 PM »
It's kind of hard for jroa to be anything when he has to be lifted into work with the high bay crane.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1784 on: September 12, 2016, 08:32:21 PM »
...
 but different masses will all fall at different rates of speed.
...

LOL

Take one clay ball of 100 grams.
Drop it from wherever you want.

Take two clay balls of 100 grams each.
Drop them from same point.
Same speed of fall.

Take three clay balls of 100 grams each.
Again, same speed of fall.

Join two clay balls into one.
Will they fall at the same speed as two separate balls?
Ofcourse.
There wasn't difference in fall speed when they were separated,
so it won't be if you join them. There is no difference in acceleration and speed.

Drop one clay ball of 100 grams, and two joined balls of 2 x 100 grams as one.
Will they fall at same speed, or ball of 200 grams will fall faster?

Remember, 2 x 100 grams fall the same speed whether you join them or not.
So, 3 x 100 grams will also fall at the same speed.
Join them or not, it will change nothing.

Now, take one ball of 100 grams and divide it into two of 50 grams.
Or into 5 of 20 grams.
Or into 100 of 1 gram.

Each of those grams will fall at the same speed, joined with others or not.

Same goes for milligrams, and so on...
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1785 on: September 12, 2016, 09:37:31 PM »

Do you need a kleenex?  I am sorry that I make you cry so much, but you don't have to cry yourself to sleep every night.

Nah your wife does a great job comforting me

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1786 on: September 12, 2016, 11:17:29 PM »

Do you need a kleenex?  I am sorry that I make you cry so much, but you don't have to cry yourself to sleep every night.

Nah your wife does a great job comforting me

Are you still trolling and derailing this thread?

*

disputeone

  • 28046
  • +114/-115
  • Or should I?
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1787 on: September 12, 2016, 11:22:28 PM »
Another win for FE 😂😂
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1788 on: September 12, 2016, 11:25:19 PM »
If only a moderator would step in and do some moderating on this thread, it's needed.




Oh wait...
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!

*

Crouton

  • Flat Earth Inspector General of High Fashion Crimes and Misdemeanors
  • 17037
  • +5/-4
  • He who walks away from Omelas
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1789 on: September 12, 2016, 11:28:06 PM »
If only a moderator would step in and do some moderating on this thread, it's needed.




Oh wait...

I don't know.  Have you tried?  Maybe there's a way to report jroa to himself.  Seems like a decent enough fellow.  I'm sure he'd give himself a temporary ban as a warning for starters.
Intelligentia et magnanimitas vincvnt violentiam et desperationem.
The truth behind NASA's budget

?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1790 on: September 13, 2016, 12:19:46 AM »
If only a moderator would step in and do some moderating on this thread, it's needed.




Oh wait...

I don't know.  Have you tried?  Maybe there's a way to report jroa to himself.  Seems like a decent enough fellow.  I'm sure he'd give himself a temporary ban as a warning for starters.

Maybe. Jroa definitely isn't a dishonest and biased troll of a mod, anyone can see that!
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!

*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1791 on: September 13, 2016, 01:41:07 AM »
Can't believe how many noobs respond to the in-house troll.  Just ignore jroa - he's a bitter alcoholic who's only pleasure comes from people responding to his baiting. 
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1792 on: September 13, 2016, 02:05:26 AM »
Can't believe how many noobs respond to the in-house troll.  Just ignore jroa - he's a bitter alcoholic who's only pleasure comes from people responding to his baiting.

I learnt that years ago.  The guy is more or less a pervert.  However since he pointed out my trigonometry was wrong I have been a bit more tolerant with him.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1793 on: September 13, 2016, 02:13:20 AM »
...
 but different masses will all fall at different rates of speed.
...

LOL

Take one clay ball of 100 grams.
Drop it from wherever you want.

Take two clay balls of 100 grams each.
Drop them from same point.
Same speed of fall.

Take three clay balls of 100 grams each.
Again, same speed of fall.

Join two clay balls into one.
Will they fall at the same speed as two separate balls?
Ofcourse.
There wasn't difference in fall speed when they were separated,
so it won't be if you join them. There is no difference in acceleration and speed.

Drop one clay ball of 100 grams, and two joined balls of 2 x 100 grams as one.
Will they fall at same speed, or ball of 200 grams will fall faster?

Remember, 2 x 100 grams fall the same speed whether you join them or not.
So, 3 x 100 grams will also fall at the same speed.
Join them or not, it will change nothing.

Now, take one ball of 100 grams and divide it into two of 50 grams.
Or into 5 of 20 grams.
Or into 100 of 1 gram.

Each of those grams will fall at the same speed, joined with others or not.

Same goes for milligrams, and so on...
wrong, it would change. It just won't change to your eye perception at close range.

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1794 on: September 13, 2016, 02:42:25 AM »
...
 but different masses will all fall at different rates of speed.
...

LOL

Take one clay ball of 100 grams.
Drop it from wherever you want.

Take two clay balls of 100 grams each.
Drop them from same point.
Same speed of fall.

Take three clay balls of 100 grams each.
Again, same speed of fall.

Join two clay balls into one.
Will they fall at the same speed as two separate balls?
Ofcourse.
There wasn't difference in fall speed when they were separated,
so it won't be if you join them. There is no difference in acceleration and speed.

Drop one clay ball of 100 grams, and two joined balls of 2 x 100 grams as one.
Will they fall at same speed, or ball of 200 grams will fall faster?

Remember, 2 x 100 grams fall the same speed whether you join them or not.
So, 3 x 100 grams will also fall at the same speed.
Join them or not, it will change nothing.

Now, take one ball of 100 grams and divide it into two of 50 grams.
Or into 5 of 20 grams.
Or into 100 of 1 gram.

Each of those grams will fall at the same speed, joined with others or not.

Same goes for milligrams, and so on...
wrong, it would change. It just won't change to your eye perception at close range.

There will be a difference created by resistance through the air, where, other things being equal,  a heavier object has a greater ability to penetrate the air than the other.   


...
 but different masses will all fall at different rates of speed.
...


Correct if this is done in a resistive medium such as air
« Last Edit: September 13, 2016, 02:51:49 AM by Aliveandkicking »

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1795 on: September 13, 2016, 07:30:31 AM »
...
 but different masses will all fall at different rates of speed.
...

LOL

Take one clay ball of 100 grams.
Drop it from wherever you want.

Take two clay balls of 100 grams each.
Drop them from same point.
Same speed of fall.

Take three clay balls of 100 grams each.
Again, same speed of fall.

Join two clay balls into one.
Will they fall at the same speed as two separate balls?
Ofcourse.
There wasn't difference in fall speed when they were separated,
so it won't be if you join them. There is no difference in acceleration and speed.

Drop one clay ball of 100 grams, and two joined balls of 2 x 100 grams as one.
Will they fall at same speed, or ball of 200 grams will fall faster?

Remember, 2 x 100 grams fall the same speed whether you join them or not.
So, 3 x 100 grams will also fall at the same speed.
Join them or not, it will change nothing.

Now, take one ball of 100 grams and divide it into two of 50 grams.
Or into 5 of 20 grams.
Or into 100 of 1 gram.

Each of those grams will fall at the same speed, joined with others or not.

Same goes for milligrams, and so on...
wrong, it would change. It just won't change to your eye perception at close range.

There will be a difference created by resistance through the air, where, other things being equal,  a heavier object has a greater ability to penetrate the air than the other.   


...
 but different masses will all fall at different rates of speed.
...


Correct if this is done in a resistive medium such as air
It's always done in a resistive medium and cannot  ever be anything else  but in a resistive medium, however weak or strong that is.

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1796 on: September 13, 2016, 09:29:17 AM »
...
 but different masses will all fall at different rates of speed.
...

LOL

Take one clay ball of 100 grams.
Drop it from wherever you want.

Take two clay balls of 100 grams each.
Drop them from same point.
Same speed of fall.

Take three clay balls of 100 grams each.
Again, same speed of fall.

Join two clay balls into one.
Will they fall at the same speed as two separate balls?
Ofcourse.
There wasn't difference in fall speed when they were separated,
so it won't be if you join them. There is no difference in acceleration and speed.

Drop one clay ball of 100 grams, and two joined balls of 2 x 100 grams as one.
Will they fall at same speed, or ball of 200 grams will fall faster?

Remember, 2 x 100 grams fall the same speed whether you join them or not.
So, 3 x 100 grams will also fall at the same speed.
Join them or not, it will change nothing.

Now, take one ball of 100 grams and divide it into two of 50 grams.
Or into 5 of 20 grams.
Or into 100 of 1 gram.

Each of those grams will fall at the same speed, joined with others or not.

Same goes for milligrams, and so on...
wrong, it would change. It just won't change to your eye perception at close range.

There will be a difference created by resistance through the air, where, other things being equal,  a heavier object has a greater ability to penetrate the air than the other.   


...
 but different masses will all fall at different rates of speed.
...


Correct if this is done in a resistive medium such as air
It's always done in a resistive medium and cannot  ever be anything else  but in a resistive medium, however weak or strong that is.

It is a somewhat irrelevant point.  What is relevant is you have claimed there is something difficult about creating low pressure in large containers and there is absolutely nothing in your model to cause that.

What do you mean by 'more atmospheric pressure'?     It should be simple to use different words to describe what you mean by that expression.

 

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1797 on: September 13, 2016, 09:33:02 AM »

It is a somewhat irrelevant point.  What is relevant is you have claimed there is something difficult about creating low pressure in large containers and there is absolutely nothing in your model to cause that.
What do you mean by this?

What do you mean by 'more atmospheric pressure'?     It should be simple to use different words to describe what you mean by that expression.
What do you mean by this?

*

Aliveandkicking

  • 1100
  • +0/-0
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1798 on: September 13, 2016, 09:40:22 AM »

It is a somewhat irrelevant point.  What is relevant is you have claimed there is something difficult about creating low pressure in large containers and there is absolutely nothing in your model to cause that.
What do you mean by this?

What do you mean by 'more atmospheric pressure'?     It should be simple to use different words to describe what you mean by that expression.
What do you mean by this?

I can hardly be bothered to reply to you in the first place and i have no intention of being your victim again.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Den Pressure - A Definable Hypothesis & Experiments (Scepti, iWitness)
« Reply #1799 on: September 13, 2016, 09:43:16 AM »

It is a somewhat irrelevant point.  What is relevant is you have claimed there is something difficult about creating low pressure in large containers and there is absolutely nothing in your model to cause that.
What do you mean by this?

What do you mean by 'more atmospheric pressure'?     It should be simple to use different words to describe what you mean by that expression.
What do you mean by this?

I can hardly be bothered to reply to you in the first place and i have no intention of being your victim again.
That's good because you had little to say in the first place. Backward is the word I'd use for you. Utterly backward and unable to understand what's been said even when told many many times.
You just carry on being backward.