Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!

  • 98 Replies
  • 19554 Views
*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Please explain: How does a concrete building survive 50+ million degree heat?


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiroshima_Peace_Memorial

Yet Both WTC towers were completely destroyed from Jet Fuel which burns 600 degrees in the open air?



200,000 tons of Steel and 425,000 cubic yards of concrete OBLITERATED.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2016, 10:31:04 PM »
lol

duurrrrr


lol
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

Brouwer

  • 830
  • +0/-0
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2016, 11:30:46 PM »
Yet Both WTC towers were completely destroyed from Jet Fuel which burns 600 degrees in the open air?

200,000 tons of Steel and 425,000 cubic yards of concrete OBLITERATED.
And the Pentagon was hit by an invisible plane.

yawn

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45129
  • +90/-135
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2016, 08:06:53 AM »
Please explain: How does a concrete building survive 50+ million degree heat?


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiroshima_Peace_Memorial
You seem to have a fairly generous definition of "survive".
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2016, 08:41:10 AM »
LOL @ trees still standing.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45129
  • +90/-135
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2016, 09:09:23 AM »
BTW, the atomic bomb exploded at an altitude of 1870 feet over Hiroshima.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2016, 09:34:18 AM »
BTW, the atomic bomb exploded at an altitude of 1870 feet over Hiroshima.

I am fairly sure that the blast was supposed to go more than 1/3 of a mile, markjo.  ::)

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45129
  • +90/-135
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2016, 09:53:01 AM »
BTW, the atomic bomb exploded at an altitude of 1870 feet over Hiroshima.

I am fairly sure that the blast was supposed to go more than 1/3 of a mile, markjo.  ::)
All of the buildings that didn't survive the blast suggest that you're right.  Do you have a point?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2016, 10:22:06 AM »
It's just proof that we're living in a false reality.

To suggest that a single bomb devastated an entire city and vaporized Human Bones, and there still be trees standing. Likewise and equally absurd, is suggesting Jet Fuel could bring down two of the most sophisticated skyscrapers the world has ever seen.

Conclusion: Nukes and 9/11 are a fraud.
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45129
  • +90/-135
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2016, 10:24:01 AM »
It's just proof that we're living in a false reality.
Reality is for people who can't handle drugs.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2016, 10:25:58 AM »
BTW, the atomic bomb exploded at an altitude of 1870 feet over Hiroshima.

I am fairly sure that the blast was supposed to go more than 1/3 of a mile, markjo.  ::)
All of the buildings that didn't survive the blast suggest that you're right.  Do you have a point?

Just pointing out your debating fallacies. 

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45129
  • +90/-135
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2016, 11:06:03 AM »
BTW, the atomic bomb exploded at an altitude of 1870 feet over Hiroshima.

I am fairly sure that the blast was supposed to go more than 1/3 of a mile, markjo.  ::)
All of the buildings that didn't survive the blast suggest that you're right.  Do you have a point?

Just pointing out your debating fallacies.
Oh?  When did you do that? ???
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2016, 11:17:55 AM »
BTW, the atomic bomb exploded at an altitude of 1870 feet over Hiroshima.

I am fairly sure that the blast was supposed to go more than 1/3 of a mile, markjo.  ::)
All of the buildings that didn't survive the blast suggest that you're right.  Do you have a point?

Just pointing out your debating fallacies.
Oh?  When did you do that? ???

Always.  Were you in a coma, or were monkeys pecking on your keyboard? 

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45129
  • +90/-135
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #13 on: July 28, 2016, 12:09:58 PM »
BTW, the atomic bomb exploded at an altitude of 1870 feet over Hiroshima.

I am fairly sure that the blast was supposed to go more than 1/3 of a mile, markjo.  ::)
All of the buildings that didn't survive the blast suggest that you're right.  Do you have a point?

Just pointing out your debating fallacies.
Oh?  When did you do that? ???

Always.  Were you in a coma, or were monkeys pecking on your keyboard?
Hmm...  I keep warning you about your drinking.  It looks like you're hallucinating again.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #14 on: July 28, 2016, 12:50:21 PM »
It's just proof that we're living in a false reality.

To suggest that a single bomb devastated an entire city and vaporized Human Bones, and there still be trees standing. Likewise and equally absurd, is suggesting Jet Fuel could bring down two of the most sophisticated skyscrapers the world has ever seen.

Conclusion: Nukes and 9/11 are a fraud.
Science is scary isn't it?
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3736
  • +9/-8
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #15 on: July 28, 2016, 02:45:58 PM »
It's just proof that we're living in a false reality.

To suggest that a single bomb devastated an entire city and vaporized Human Bones, and there still be trees standing. Likewise and equally absurd, is suggesting Jet Fuel could bring down two of the most sophisticated skyscrapers the world has ever seen.

Conclusion: Nukes and 9/11 are a fraud.

Or that nukes are real but 9/11 is an inside job.
Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Trans rights are human rights.

*

iWitness

  • 1173
  • +0/-0
  • If the earth is round then what is your problem?
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #16 on: July 28, 2016, 06:01:05 PM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...
Disclaimer: I am confused. Everything I say is speculative and not admissible in a court of law; however, I am neither insane nor a threat to myself or others. I am simply curious about everything in life and enjoy talking about crazy shit. Oh, & btw I like turtles.

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3736
  • +9/-8
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #17 on: July 28, 2016, 07:47:17 PM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Trans rights are human rights.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #18 on: July 29, 2016, 02:17:29 AM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #19 on: July 29, 2016, 06:41:33 AM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?
Fucking leave.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45129
  • +90/-135
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #20 on: July 29, 2016, 06:58:53 AM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?
Here are some lawyers that would disagree with you:
If you or your family member have had internal cancer, leukemia or other lung illness like fibrosis or silicosis within the last fifty years (even if family member is deceased) or if you get cancer/ leukemia or one of these lung illnesses and were physically present at the Nevada test site / Mercury Nevada, Trinity test site / Los Alamos New Mexico.  South Pacific / Marshall Islands - Bikini Atoll, Enewetak Atoll, Johnson Island or Christmas Island.  South Atlantic Argus 1, 2 or 3.  Operation Wigwam, Operation Hardtack One shot Yucca, Operation Dominic One shot Frigate Bird or shot Swordfish or Amchitka Island, Alaska and were exposed to radiation you may qualify for $75,000 to $400,000 tax free.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #21 on: July 29, 2016, 07:22:52 AM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?
Here are some lawyers that would disagree with you:
If you or your family member have had internal cancer, leukemia or other lung illness like fibrosis or silicosis within the last fifty years (even if family member is deceased) or if you get cancer/ leukemia or one of these lung illnesses and were physically present at the Nevada test site / Mercury Nevada, Trinity test site / Los Alamos New Mexico.  South Pacific / Marshall Islands - Bikini Atoll, Enewetak Atoll, Johnson Island or Christmas Island.  South Atlantic Argus 1, 2 or 3.  Operation Wigwam, Operation Hardtack One shot Yucca, Operation Dominic One shot Frigate Bird or shot Swordfish or Amchitka Island, Alaska and were exposed to radiation you may qualify for $75,000 to $400,000 tax free.
You did actually say that some lawyers would disagree with me. Lawyers.
Are these the same lawyers that would do anything to make a dollar/pound or whatever currency is their preferred/usual spend?


*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #22 on: July 29, 2016, 07:27:39 AM »
Maybe their parents worked at Rocky Flat and contracted cancer from make nuclear bombs.

Fucking leave.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45129
  • +90/-135
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #23 on: July 29, 2016, 09:36:49 AM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?
Here are some lawyers that would disagree with you:
If you or your family member have had internal cancer, leukemia or other lung illness like fibrosis or silicosis within the last fifty years (even if family member is deceased) or if you get cancer/ leukemia or one of these lung illnesses and were physically present at the Nevada test site / Mercury Nevada, Trinity test site / Los Alamos New Mexico.  South Pacific / Marshall Islands - Bikini Atoll, Enewetak Atoll, Johnson Island or Christmas Island.  South Atlantic Argus 1, 2 or 3.  Operation Wigwam, Operation Hardtack One shot Yucca, Operation Dominic One shot Frigate Bird or shot Swordfish or Amchitka Island, Alaska and were exposed to radiation you may qualify for $75,000 to $400,000 tax free.
You did actually say that some lawyers would disagree with me. Lawyers.
Are these the same lawyers that would do anything to make a dollar/pound or whatever currency is their preferred/usual spend?
Do you really think that the government would pay millions in damages if the nukes weren't real?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #24 on: July 29, 2016, 10:05:48 AM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?
Here are some lawyers that would disagree with you:
If you or your family member have had internal cancer, leukemia or other lung illness like fibrosis or silicosis within the last fifty years (even if family member is deceased) or if you get cancer/ leukemia or one of these lung illnesses and were physically present at the Nevada test site / Mercury Nevada, Trinity test site / Los Alamos New Mexico.  South Pacific / Marshall Islands - Bikini Atoll, Enewetak Atoll, Johnson Island or Christmas Island.  South Atlantic Argus 1, 2 or 3.  Operation Wigwam, Operation Hardtack One shot Yucca, Operation Dominic One shot Frigate Bird or shot Swordfish or Amchitka Island, Alaska and were exposed to radiation you may qualify for $75,000 to $400,000 tax free.
You did actually say that some lawyers would disagree with me. Lawyers.
Are these the same lawyers that would do anything to make a dollar/pound or whatever currency is their preferred/usual spend?
Do you really think that the government would pay millions in damages if the nukes weren't real?
What is a Government?
We can be told that X,Y and Z were paid X,Y and Z payouts and yet we have no way of knowing.



*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45129
  • +90/-135
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #25 on: July 29, 2016, 11:56:27 AM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?
Here are some lawyers that would disagree with you:
If you or your family member have had internal cancer, leukemia or other lung illness like fibrosis or silicosis within the last fifty years (even if family member is deceased) or if you get cancer/ leukemia or one of these lung illnesses and were physically present at the Nevada test site / Mercury Nevada, Trinity test site / Los Alamos New Mexico.  South Pacific / Marshall Islands - Bikini Atoll, Enewetak Atoll, Johnson Island or Christmas Island.  South Atlantic Argus 1, 2 or 3.  Operation Wigwam, Operation Hardtack One shot Yucca, Operation Dominic One shot Frigate Bird or shot Swordfish or Amchitka Island, Alaska and were exposed to radiation you may qualify for $75,000 to $400,000 tax free.
You did actually say that some lawyers would disagree with me. Lawyers.
Are these the same lawyers that would do anything to make a dollar/pound or whatever currency is their preferred/usual spend?
Do you really think that the government would pay millions in damages if the nukes weren't real?
What is a Government?
We can be told that X,Y and Z were paid X,Y and Z payouts and yet we have no way of knowing.
That's why even the government is answerable to the legal system.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3736
  • +9/-8
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #26 on: July 29, 2016, 12:19:40 PM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?

Do you have any proof?
Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Trans rights are human rights.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #27 on: July 29, 2016, 12:25:11 PM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?
Here are some lawyers that would disagree with you:
If you or your family member have had internal cancer, leukemia or other lung illness like fibrosis or silicosis within the last fifty years (even if family member is deceased) or if you get cancer/ leukemia or one of these lung illnesses and were physically present at the Nevada test site / Mercury Nevada, Trinity test site / Los Alamos New Mexico.  South Pacific / Marshall Islands - Bikini Atoll, Enewetak Atoll, Johnson Island or Christmas Island.  South Atlantic Argus 1, 2 or 3.  Operation Wigwam, Operation Hardtack One shot Yucca, Operation Dominic One shot Frigate Bird or shot Swordfish or Amchitka Island, Alaska and were exposed to radiation you may qualify for $75,000 to $400,000 tax free.
You did actually say that some lawyers would disagree with me. Lawyers.
Are these the same lawyers that would do anything to make a dollar/pound or whatever currency is their preferred/usual spend?
Do you really think that the government would pay millions in damages if the nukes weren't real?
What is a Government?
We can be told that X,Y and Z were paid X,Y and Z payouts and yet we have no way of knowing.
That's why even the government is answerable to the legal system.
And this is where is goes deeper down that rabbit hole. What is the legal system?
Who runs it?
Someone has to have control. Who?

Those who control the money control the entire system.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #28 on: July 29, 2016, 12:33:00 PM »
lol, only in your sci-fi wet dreams...

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe that building was a little more stronger than the surrounding buildings and that the trees being skinny offered little surface area to be pushed down and they are flexible?
Has it occurred to you that nukes are more likely just a scare mongering tactic that cannot do anything destructive unless they're used in fictional books or TV films?

Do you have any proof?
That's down to interpretation and using detective skills and common sense, plus hunches. You know, that kind of stuff.

Is it a proof?....No it's not, but as iWitness said: nukes can't destroy concrete buildings but jet fuel can......???

If you have no issue with anything and don't feel like it deserves further digging, then leave it and accept it. The thing is, plenty of people do have an issue and they aren't all flat Earth theorists, either.

This nuke stuff has a strong smell of bullshit about it in some aspects. Proving that would be nigh on impossible for the average Joe, or even the above average Joe.

Even in the 40's when the bombs were allegedly detonated, the news channel had it down as a propaganda machine in motion, citing that there was no nukes.


Re: Nukes can't destroy Concrete Buildings.... but Jet Fuel CAN!
« Reply #29 on: July 29, 2016, 04:25:32 PM »
Is there no way to compromise theories?

Like government nuked one building, and terrorists crashed two planes into one building.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.