Have any of you ever wondered HOW the first ancient observer discovered how to predict a solar eclipse? I'm talking ancient times. You could argue that he witnessed one and then decided to track the next one... but HOW?
Well... you need knowledge of TWO hidden objects. Now don't freak out - these objects are actually applicable to BOTH the RE and FE models. On the RE model they are known as 'nodes'. On the FE model they are known as Rahu and Ketu. They are also known as 'head of the dragon' and 'tail of the dragon'. A dragon is a play on the shape of a snake. Later on the dragons/snakes were represented by double-headed eagles, which I'm sure the more intelligent members will recognize as markers of the current ruling elite.
Back to the eclipse: You NEED to know about and BE ABLE TO TRACK two(2) hidden objects in the sky in order to predict and locate solar eclipses (and lunar). It is NOT enough to say 'well the moon and sun and earth will be in aligment on such and such date'... HOW would you know when they would align? On the RE model the nodes are required to predict the eclipses. On the FE model the 2 shadow objects are required to predict the eclipses.
So which one is 'true'?
The 'nodes'? Or the 2 shadow objects?
Well let's start with the LUNAR ECLIPSE on a flat-Earth model:
Right off the bat, the moon turns TRANSLUCENT RED.
When is the last time you made a red-shadow on anything? Perhaps you didn't have enough 'umbria' around you or whatever hocus-pocus you need to rationale a RED TRANSLUCENT TINTING. No matter how many times you wish to see 'the earths shadow' during a lunar eclipse, you will OBSERVE a RED TINTING.
Again, draw from your life's observation of shadows and your common sense. There are shadows, and then there is red tinting:
Now that you are thinking clearly, ^ is that a 'shadow'? or a FIREY RED TINT? Don't repeat what you've been told ad infinitum. SAY what you OBSERVE.
A RE lunar eclipse does NOT show a 'shadow of the earth'. PLEASE spare me the 'umbria' talk unless make something that is bright white, orangey red by means of SHADOWS. ...good... What you are seeing during a lunar eclipse is known as the 'tail of the dragon/snake', Ketu, or the asending lunar node (on the RE model). There are multiple names for the object, but the point is that it IS an OBJECT. -- not a shadow. Thus Lunar eclipse are not only perfectly applicable to a flat earth model but indeed make perfect sense (more on this in a bit..)
But what about the Solar Eclipse.
On the RE model it's the decending node that makes that happen and therefore allows for it to be predicted. On the FE model Ketu or the head of the dragon is the OBJECT that blocks the sun.
Ever see a total solar eclipse? With your OWN EYES?
Tell me something (be honest):
Did you see the moon block the sun?
OR did you see a black OBJECT block the sun. You've all seen the moon during a pitch black night. Even though the new moon is 'dark' you can clearly see that it's 'the new moon' (at NIGHT)
SO - during a total solar eclipse, when 'day turns to NIGHT' why don't you see this:
^ YES that image is FAKE!
^ NO there are ZERO REAL photos of solar-eclipse observers showing anything like this!
^ YES! I'm not making this up, BUT: THIS IMAGE IS FROM NASA!!! link:
http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/img/total_lg.gifInstead during a total solar eclipse (or partial) you see a BLACK OBJECT (not the moon) move in front of the sun the following are real images:
Forget what you've been TOLD ad infinitum -- Do you OBSERVE a NEW MOON in a "NIGHT" SKY blocking the sun in the images above?
Exactly.
Rahu is his name....... the second OBJECT aobve the flat earth that accounts for the eclipses...
Ask youself why NASA felt the need to FAKE images of the total solar eclipse with FAKE images like this:
That's not what I saw. That's not what anybody saw. That's not what anyone will ever see. Because the new moon is not responsible for the eclipses... period.
On a Flat earth model there are 2 objects which exist that explain the eclipse.. they have multiple names throughout history...
So WHY tell the masses that the Earth is round? That's a whole 'nuther post... but I will say this: Those on here that who are Illuinated know that the solar eclpse was used to TRICK the masses into giving up their power to certain 'holy men' in return for these 'holy men' 'ridding the sky of the sun-eating snake god'. This is well known as the basis of the elites POWER (the eclipse trick as I call it).
So why make the world round? Simple: On a flat map predicting eclipses is EASY. More importantly predicting their LOCATION on a flat map is VERY SIMPLE. ONE triple-sarros cycle (3 sarros cycles) and the solar eclipse returns to the exact location as the first, and then REPEATS the same exact patterns until 3 cycles are repeated again. On a ROUND earth model the eclipse path looks like a bunch of chaotic wavy, cruvy paths around the 'globe'. by contrast on the flat earth model the solar eclipse locations form part of a concentric spiral over a flat earth. Simply move north, south, east, or west to 'follow' the eclipse location. No need to follow a bunch of wavy/curvy globular eclipse paths:
^ Those of you on this forum that are Iluminated already know what this pretoglyphy (ancient rock carving) depicts, for those that don't.. allow me to explain:
The round object with consentric rings is the flat earth.. the rings represent the spiral path of the sun and moon over the flat earth. The 'holy man' wearing goat horns (to look like a 'devil') is BLOCKING OUT THE SUN... the hand print above him shows that he is 'blocking out' or 'covering' the sun... it is depecting how the eclipse was used to trick the masses into subjigation... the first 'false flag' as conspiracy types call it...
The trick and it's allegory is detailed here:
Bee well...
-- the honorable djhives