Dem Watch 2020

  • 19 Replies
  • 376 Views
*

Stash

  • 3642
Dem Watch 2020
« on: December 04, 2019, 12:33:53 AM »
Each week we should bet on the next Dem to drop culminating in the foreshadowing of the DNC Nom.

Betting begins, who is the next to drop out? Each cycle is 7 days, starting with today, oddly, Tuesday. Double points for predicting a 2-fer in the week cycle. We are now in week 1. Put your bet in brackets, e.g., [Week 1 - Bennet] Vitriolic reason: Who? Something like that.

Vitriolic reasons why your pick is doomed is very much appreciated and rewarded.



My first pick:

[Week 1 - Booker] Money. Raising nothing, needs to preserve at least a minimal standing as Junior Senator to remain a senator.

No. That sudden lurch forwards is the atmospheric slosh effect.

*

Shifter

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11966
  • ASI
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2019, 01:40:40 AM »
Hard to say who is next. Most of them are likely to lose

I've not even heard of this Yang character in any circle. I'll bet him. He's probably a plant by the Chinese anyway trying to get America to soften up over trade, Taiwan and the South China Sea

'President Castro'. I just cant see that happening thanks to Cuba

'President Buttgieg'. Too much. Everyone will just say President Butt and that would just be embarrassing

Gabbard and Williamson look hot enough but in all likelihood it will comedown to the 2 oldest 'white men' in there. Biden vs Bloomberg. I go Bloomberg simply because after all the trouble Trump has got himself into in getting a foreign country to investigate him, it would be sucked in if it was utterly pointless.

But put me down for Yang. I dont trust that smile.

*

Stash

  • 3642
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2019, 01:52:40 AM »
Hard to say who is next. Most of them are likely to lose

I've not even heard of this Yang character in any circle. I'll bet him. He's probably a plant by the Chinese anyway trying to get America to soften up over trade, Taiwan and the South China Sea

'President Castro'. I just cant see that happening thanks to Cuba

'President Buttgieg'. Too much. Everyone will just say President Butt and that would just be embarrassing

Gabbard and Williamson look hot enough but in all likelihood it will comedown to the 2 oldest 'white men' in there. Biden vs Bloomberg. I go Bloomberg simply because after all the trouble Trump has got himself into in getting a foreign country to investigate him, it would be sucked in if it was utterly pointless.

But put me down for Yang. I dont trust that smile.

All solid summations of the field.

Shifter down for [Week 1 - Yang]

So far we have:

[Week 1 - Booker]
[Week 1 - Yang]
No. That sudden lurch forwards is the atmospheric slosh effect.

*

sandokhan

  • Flat Earth Sultan
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 4872
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2019, 04:41:26 AM »
None of these candidates stand a chance unless something happens to the economy: we will know more as they enter the first primaries in February, as to who is going to drop out (Williamson among the first to do so).

Even if "Trump" is impeached or nothing happens in the Senate, or he receives a simple censure vote, or if Pence becomes President, or if another Republican steps in and wins the nomination, the Democratic candidates cannot win.

Now, we know that the last economic crisis was due to the repo event in 2007:

https://web.archive.org/web/20180210192610/https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/gsb/files/fin_11_17_gorton.pdf

This time around the effect of the repo crisis in September 2019 will be different: a rise in inflation, which will cause the Fed, in my opinion, to raise rates next year, either before the election, or soon after.

« Last Edit: December 04, 2019, 04:44:21 AM by sandokhan »

*

Bom Tishop

  • 10641
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2019, 03:31:21 PM »
Why does Biden look confused on where he is at and what he is doing?


But put me down for Yang. I dont trust that smile.

You have been fooled. That is his long-term constipation face.

5 ounces of magnesium for 3 days straight and he will look like the others.
Quote from: Crutchwater
Quote from: FlatOrange
You can't murder a suicide victim
Tell that to Epstein!

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40564
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2019, 04:04:45 PM »
I didn't realize some of the candidates were still running, and I've never even heard of Bennet.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Bullwinkle

  • Flat Earth Curator
  • 17703
  • "Umm, WTF ???"
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2019, 02:28:16 AM »
I'm waiting for Biden to show up for a rally in the wrong state.
RE can never win this argument.
FE can't be disproved.

*

Stash

  • 3642
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2019, 05:03:26 PM »
I didn't realize some of the candidates were still running, and I've never even heard of Bennet.

I know, same, never heard of the guy. I think he is the equivalent of me running for the Nom.
No. That sudden lurch forwards is the atmospheric slosh effect.

*

JerkFace

  • 10228
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2019, 05:40:34 PM »
I didn't realize some of the candidates were still running, and I've never even heard of Bennet.

I know, same, never heard of the guy. I think he is the equivalent of me running for the Nom.

Makes you wonder if the Celine:Mom  ticket really could have a chance.   :)
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Stash

  • 3642
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2019, 06:06:29 PM »
I didn't realize some of the candidates were still running, and I've never even heard of Bennet.

I know, same, never heard of the guy. I think he is the equivalent of me running for the Nom.

Makes you wonder if the Celine:Mom  ticket really could have a chance.   :)

I think if we all here chipped in a few bucks each to the Celine:Mom ticket they would have just as much in their warchest as that Bennet guy. And probably a better chance...
No. That sudden lurch forwards is the atmospheric slosh effect.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40564
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #10 on: January 04, 2020, 09:56:47 AM »
https://www.fox29.com/news/amy-klobuchar-says-in-interview-she-will-declassify-ufo-documents-if-elected-president

Quote
MOUNT WASHINGTON VALLEY, N.H. - Democratic Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who is running for president in 2020, said in an interview on Monday that she would declassify UFO documents if she is elected president.

Klobuchar confirmed the promise to look into documents regarding unidentified flying objects in an interview with the Conway Daily Sun in Mount Washington Valley, New Hampshire.

I think we dont know enough ... I dont know whats happened, not just with that sighting, but with others, she told the Sun. And I think one of the things a president could do is to look into whats there in terms of what does the science say; what does our military say.

Obviously the lizard people will make sure this doesn't happen.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Pezevenk

  • 13739
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #11 on: January 04, 2020, 10:43:44 AM »
I'm not sure if this is a case of her trying to pander to UFO nut votes, or her taking the piss because she knows she will lose.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40564
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2020, 01:00:14 PM »
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/1220445820505546755?s=20
Quote
I think I'll probably vote for Bernie... Hes been insanely consistent his entire life. Hes basically been saying the same thing, been for the same thing his whole life. And that in and of itself is a very powerful structure to operate from. -Joe Rogan

Weird twitter leftists are mad at Bernie for not rejecting Joe Rogan's support. I'm not going to copy and paste the replies THERE ARE TOO MANY.

I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Stash

  • 3642
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2020, 01:56:26 PM »
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/1220445820505546755?s=20
Quote
I think I'll probably vote for Bernie... Hes been insanely consistent his entire life. Hes basically been saying the same thing, been for the same thing his whole life. And that in and of itself is a very powerful structure to operate from. -Joe Rogan

Weird twitter leftists are mad at Bernie for not rejecting Joe Rogan's support. I'm not going to copy and paste the replies THERE ARE TOO MANY.

Interesting take here on why or why not the Rogan endorsement is influential:

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/jgep94/joe-rogan-bernie-sanders-endorsement?utm_source=digg
No. That sudden lurch forwards is the atmospheric slosh effect.

*

Pezevenk

  • 13739
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2020, 03:01:32 PM »
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/1220445820505546755?s=20
Quote
I think I'll probably vote for Bernie... Hes been insanely consistent his entire life. Hes basically been saying the same thing, been for the same thing his whole life. And that in and of itself is a very powerful structure to operate from. -Joe Rogan

Weird twitter leftists are mad at Bernie for not rejecting Joe Rogan's support. I'm not going to copy and paste the replies THERE ARE TOO MANY.
Most of the people complaining about it are Warren supporters tho. They're not mad at him for that, they're attacking him because they want Warren to get the nomination instead of him.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2020, 03:04:42 PM by Pezevenk »
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40564
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2020, 03:36:06 PM »
I have decided to endorse Bernie.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Pezevenk

  • 13739
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2020, 01:58:03 AM »
I have decided to endorse Bernie.
SMH can't believe Bernie Sanders doesn't denounce endorsements coming from the Flat Earth Society.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

Pezevenk

  • 13739
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40564
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #18 on: Today at 06:28:59 PM »
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Stash

  • 3642
Re: Dem Watch 2020
« Reply #19 on: Today at 07:56:04 PM »
Still in the mix update (2/28/20):

No. That sudden lurch forwards is the atmospheric slosh effect.