Operation Moonwatch

You know he's really on to something because the Illuminati is promoting it for him.

So here's Papa Legba's take on Operation Moonwatch as he told us over the last 2 years. Lots of information here!

Anyone wanting to know what these lights in the sky we're told are satellites etc. really are should look up 'Operation Moonwatch'.

Basically, NASA conned a bunch of amateur astronomers into tracking all the naturally-occurring NEO's for them, so they could later re-assign them as 'satellites' or what-have-you. It was part of the 'International Geophysical Year', 1957-58, another large part of which was Antarctic exploration. Interestingly, 'Sputnik' was launched (& was allegedly visible from the ground with the naked eye, lol!) in late 1957 & the Antarctic Treaty was signed in 1959. Of course, after a few months of the dumb geeks gathering data, those gosh-darned Rooskies launched Sputnik, & good old NASA could tell everyone exactly when it could be viewed passing overhead... Interestingly, 'Sputnik' was launched (& was allegedly visible from the ground with the naked eye, lol!) in late 1957 & the Antarctic Treaty was signed in 1959.

Can you see what they did there?

Like you could see an object the size of a beachball from 100 miles away!


Near-Earth-Objects, or NEO's have been known about for centuries; they used to call them 'wandering stars'. Now they call them 'satellites'. Plus, of course, if these 'satellites' etc. were just trackable NEOs it'd explain why they're visible from 100s of miles away too, as they're basically big lumps of rock that've been heated white-hot in the thermosphere... No need for holograms; just re-name things that've always been there, after getting a bunch of mugs to do the hard work of tracking their orbits for you in the first place...

Simplest & cheapest solution imaginable.

That's what most of the lights-in-the-sky we're told are satellites in fact are.


Here are some photos:

I'd also like to thank the thermosphere for being able to heat up rocks to white-hot despite being so thin, because that makes sense.  I'd especially like to thank certain of those polar-orbiting rocks for being heated up so much during certain parts of their "orbit" (over the flat earth) that they reach magnitude -8 and outshine everything but the moon and sun, but only for people in a 10 km wide swath, and only since 1997, with flares being predictable weeks in advance.

Quote from: Blue_Moon on June 24, 2016, 01:34:31 PM

I'd also like to thank the thermosphere for being able to heat up rocks to white-hot despite being so thin, because that makes sense.  I'd especially like to thank certain of those polar-orbiting rocks for being heated up so much during certain parts of their "orbit" (over the flat earth) that they reach magnitude -8 and outshine everything but the moon and sun, but only for people in a 10 km wide swath, and only since 1997, with flares being predictable weeks in advance.

Did you really just write that?

LOL!!!

You fucking dick.

Most Iridium satellites are still controlled, so their flares can be predicted. The Iridium communication satellites have a peculiar shape with three polished door-sized antennas, 120° apart and at 40° angles with the main bus. The forward antenna faces the direction the satellite is travelling. Occasionally, an antenna reflects sunlight directly down at Earth, creating a predictable and quickly moving illuminated spot on the surface below of about 10 km (6.2 mi) diameter. To an observer this looks like a bright flash, or flare in the sky, with a duration of a few seconds.

It's not my thread you absolute fucking moron.

I think the most amazing part is how these near Earth objects emit radio signals.

Secondly, Flat Earthers (plus that agnostic Legba) all seem to deny the possibility rockets travelling in space. Well, however did YOU learn of the properties of the thermosphere from?

Yes, I know! It was from sounding rockets and satellites launched and maintained by NASA!

So please either admit that NASA does launch rockets and satellites into the "infinite vacuum of space" (that's for Papa's benefit!)
or just take back all the stupid nonsense you put forward about the thermosphere.

Again, I don't rightly give a fuck about teh Thermosphere & teh Woody Allen Belts.
But the Fact that NASA's own data contradicts all possibility of shpayze-flyte is very lulzy indeed.
So I shall point at it & laugh if I choose.
There's also a little thing called cold welding of metal in a vacuum that teh satylytezez have to contend with...
Let's hope they don't have any moving metal parts in them; you know, like servos, motors, even hard-drives...
Oh - They do!
Lulz!
Good job they're just NEO's then, ain't it?
And p.s. no, I also do not give a flying fuck what NEO's actually are either...
They're just there & always have been.

Maybe if we watch the moon closely we'll be able to figure out what those damn moon pigeons are.

Anyhoo; vacuum welding is a well-established industrial process...

But it don't affect flying trashcans in shpayze...

Somehow?

I'd ask NASA why, but they don't seem to wish to acknowledge the phenomenon exists...

Because Liars is my guess.

Time-wasting prick aintcha?

Your NASA pdf makes one vague, non-specific reference to vacuum welding and admits that little data on the problem exists and adds unhelpfully 'The designer should keep in mind that the lack of air and the wearing away of surface oxidants could be a problem'...

So I guess NASA do acknowledge vacuum welding but only insofar as saying they have no data on, or solutions to, the problem.

Which is pretty much what I claimed.

Besides; liquid lubricants in a hard vacuum?

GTFO!

And your other link was wiki-garbage so I didn't bother reading it.

Summary: you are a drunken lying fucking shill.

So I guess NASA do acknowledge vacuum welding

Besides; liquid lubricants in a hard vacuum?