Agreed, what's your opinion on it tho?
I think we watched 3 controlled demolitions. No building in history has ever fallen like that rather it's a failed demolition, severe building fire or structural failure. So let's say a miracle happens and one building some how falls as such....I would still have a problem with it. However 3 ..the exact same way?? Especially building 7?? Come on you don't need a doctorate to see this.
I was on a panel of specialist until 2010 when I realized most people's opinions were made no matter what they heard and stopped wasting my time. I was part of a group attempting to buy pieces of the remaining steel with no avail. Though I have performed numerous metallurgical surveys, studies and reports on exact quoted specifications of the steel. This was a huge part of my life years ago, I have never in my life came across more PhD 's and amazingly intelligent people in a non mainstream sect ever. I was just one of a plethora all working together in their different fields of specialities, and the last year I went to emi I was told the group is even bigger now. If there is anything that should be given a chance that isn't mainstream , this would be it. If you only want facts and science instead of opinions.
Just the facts of the figures on the steel and fuel best given was bogus. Finally "official" people started to agree plausible temps were not high enough to melt the steel but weaken it. Ok cool, steel starts to get weaker on a technical level every degree raised. However the said 60 percent?? More like 9 percent , especially when you take in account beam length , thickness, and heat distribution which is always just "glanced" over.
The flash point of said fuel is way too high. This is the point of 120+ fuel to reduce premature detonation. Spray alcohol on your hand and light it to understand the point.
Fact the buildings were a loss being 70 percent un occupied until directly before Silverstein bought them. Went to almost compacity , and insured for full market value not even a year before the incident, and major changes was made to the lease so Silverstein could maintain control of the land in case an incident happened 6 weeks prior. All this on buildings that were a loss for a decade before this, and needed major renovations including health related issues (example asbestos). Sure there was heavy foot traffic at the doors, but that was for the major subway entrance below. These "mysterious" companies that conveniently appeared to occupy the buildings were hollow skeleton companies, two of which had roles in the tower inspection and future clean up. Yet some how these skeleton companies managed to employ 1000s of people with no proof as such. It highly points to the possibility the majority of the true loss of life is the first responders at the scene which angers me further as they were attempting to save lives for no purpose.
Mass of interior items...actually stopping here I could literally rattle on for 200 pages without stating a single opinion. That is what is so damning about this, you need not opinions to see there is something seriously a mis.
Too many coincidences, too many things to gain from the entire 9 11 incident. Too many future laws passed, freedoms lost (always warned safety is the number one disguise to remove freedom), war crimes committed in the name of safety, too many trillions of dollars missing that the evidence was "blown up", money made ect ect.
To much to account for, I don't believe in coincidences, and I certainly don't believe in 100s working together in perfect harmony.
However as I said you need not opinions, just the facts. Some of these facts i was able to confirm personally without having to rely on others. Or you can even just use your eyes, watch 3 buildings fall perfectly and tell me it's right. Isn't this what this site is about using visual observations and nothing else?