Satan on a Skateboard.

Where's Wally, markjo?

Why the fuck is this thread not in CN?

Why the fuck is this thread not in CN?

I asked that on my first post in this thread. Alas we are still here.

Hail Satan.

Just pointing out facts, markjo.

Everybody. Hates. YOU.

I don't hate him.

I love my Papa.

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 11:51:55 AM

Just pointing out facts, markjo.

Everybody. Hates. YOU.

I don't hate him.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod. The fact he didn't ban Papa for his recent threads shows this.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.

Had no idea he is a mod.
So, wasn't kissing ass.

I don't think markjo is a mod. I could be wrong though, as I usually have to get drunk before I can be bothered to come here.

As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 10:52:11 PM

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?

Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 01:33:31 PM

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 06:55:24 AM

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!

Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 05:31:50 AM

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.

Quote from: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 02:38:37 AM

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

Quote from: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 03:17:38 AM

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

Quote from: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 03:52:20 AM

I agree it's not a direct comparison.

Quote from: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 09:13:40 PM

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.

I am Papa. I quote shit. Woohooooo!

I am Papa. I quote shit.

That is exactly what I am doing.

Thank you for noticing.

About time for the orderlies to tighten the straps
on Papa's straight jacket and medicate him for night storage.

Quote from: Stanton on May 18, 2016, 07:07:44 PM

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 11:51:55 AM

Just pointing out facts, markjo.

Everybody. Hates. YOU.

I don't hate him.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod. The fact he didn't ban Papa for his recent threads shows this.

Actually, I'm a former mod.  For some odd reason or other, the administration felt that it was no longer appropriate for a round earther to moderate the Flat Earth Society forums.

Where's Wally, markjo?

Where's Wally, markjo?

Uh-oh!  Legba is having another brain stutter!  His mind gets stuck on the same phrase all day, and that's all he can post. 

Markjo knows what I'm talking about.

You all probably do...

Now; where's Wally?

You are ignoring this user.

Are we really still here...

What part of F=pa says anything about Mass. markjo?

Where's Wally?

Object B is the exhaust.

Incorrect.

What part of F=pa says anything about Mass. markjo?

Where's Wally?

Incorrect.

What part of F=pa says anything about Mass. markjo?

Where's Wally?

The correct equation is f=ma.

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 20, 2016, 10:22:00 AM

Incorrect.

What part of F=pa says anything about Mass. markjo?

Where's Wally?

The correct equation is f=ma.

Don't confuse the poor fellow!
I don't think Poppy Leghorn realises that:
"a" is the accepted symbol for "acceleration", while the accepted symbol for "area" is "A".
"p" is the accepted symbol for "momentum", while the accepted symbol for "pressure" is "P", though "p" is used!

F=pa

pa is short for Papa

Use your imagination for F

F=pa

pa is short for Papa

Use your imagination for F

Yep,  that's about right. 

He wrote it incorrectly as Rabinoz pointed out it should have been written  F=PA,    but  please don't tell him that  forces and acceleration are vectors..    a vector can't be the product of two scalars.   It should be written  |F|=PA

The correct equation for Satan on a skate board is

 

Conservation of momentum..   derivation is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation#Derivation

As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 10:52:11 PM

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?

Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 01:33:31 PM

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 06:55:24 AM

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!

Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 05:31:50 AM

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

I agree it's not a direct comparison.

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.

The correct equation is f=ma.

The correct equation for Satan on a skate board is

 

Conservation of momentum..   derivation is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation#Derivation

As everything you say is a lie, I'm gonna just keep leaving your gibberish without comment, for intelligent people to be appalled by:

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 05:31:50 AM

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 05:31:50 AM

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 15, 2016, 10:52:11 PM

F=ma is F=ma; how does 'context' change the fact that you ended up saying that non-zero F can be created when m=0?

Then you shouldn't have any trouble telling us how much atmospheric mass a rocket needs to push against in order to accelerate.

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 05:31:50 AM

Rockets can just as easily use solid objects as the reaction mass and work just fine.

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 06:55:24 AM

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 03:44:28 PM

Quote from: Papa Legba on May 16, 2016, 01:33:31 PM

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 06:55:24 AM

What part of F=pa says anything about mass?

^This last one's a beauty!

Yes, because it shows that your claim that rocket engines work by pressure pushing against atmospheric mass is utter nonsense.

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 03:44:28 PM

you are the one who is claiming that a rocket must push against the mass of the atmosphere but refuse to explain how much atmospheric mass your rocket engine must push against.

Quote from: disputeone on May 17, 2016, 09:31:37 PM

Coke bottle  (one object) water (one object) how does the coke bottle lift off the ground?

Quote from: Mainframes on May 18, 2016, 12:11:55 AM

Quote from: markjo on May 16, 2016, 05:31:50 AM

rockets don't really need pressure in order to work.

This is totally correct. You don't need pressure at all. Just ejecting any object with mass out the back will work. It just happens to be easiest to do it with pressurised exhaust gases.

Quote from: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 02:38:37 AM

What do you think would happen if Satan was in space and threw a medicine ball half of his mass?

Quote from: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 03:17:38 AM

a rocket does not have arms that throw gas into space.

Quote from: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 03:52:20 AM

I agree it's not a direct comparison.

Quote from: disputeone on May 18, 2016, 09:13:40 PM

Just for the record i think markjo is a fair and reasonable mod.

Quote from: MrDebunk on May 20, 2016, 04:42:56 PM

The correct equation is f=ma.

Quote from: Rayzor on May 20, 2016, 08:16:43 PM

The correct equation for Satan on a skate board is

 

Conservation of momentum..   derivation is here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsiolkovsky_rocket_equation#Derivation

You put a lot of effort into being stupid.

You put a lot of effort into not understanding how a rocket works.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66748.90

Twenty eight to two now is it? That's awfully one sided, personally I'd be thinking maybe I'm the one who doesn't understand how rockets work.

So twenty-eight assorted autists & sock-puppets don't understand N3?

Big deal.

Nice try with the peer-pressure bullshit though, sperg-lord.