Poll

Does Papa Legba understand newtons third law?

No
67 (87%)
Yes
10 (13%)

Total Members Voted: 73

Newtons third law

  • 1644 Replies
  • 322100 Views
?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #120 on: May 21, 2016, 05:52:29 AM »
What would happen to a finite amount of steam if introduced to an infinite vacuum?

The steam would remain

LMFAO!!!

Comedy Gold...

Where does the steam go then Papa?

To Infinity...

But not Beyond!

The answer to this question and others could be known to you
through casual education.

Count things on your fingers kind of stuff.

What, the kind of 'casual education' that makes you lot think a rocket is somehow two separate objects?

LMAO!!!

Seems counting on your fingers isn't working too well for you.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

disputeone

  • 28002
  • +111/-100
  • Or should I?
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #121 on: May 21, 2016, 05:54:58 AM »
Are you saying the steam dissappears?

Seems like a violation of the conservation of energy to me.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #122 on: May 21, 2016, 07:12:38 AM »
Are you saying the steam dissappears?

No, slow-poke, I am not.

But I am saying your ability to spell the word 'disappears' has disappeared...

Seems like a violation of conservation of literacy to me.

How thrillingly Satanic of you!
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

Stanton

  • 236
  • +0/-0
  • Pizza Earth with Extra Cheese
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #123 on: May 21, 2016, 07:18:34 AM »

To Infinity...

But not Beyond!



That's actually pretty funny.  ;D

I don't hate you. You just grate on my nerves.




You shills REALLY need to watch your vocabulary.


*

disputeone

  • 28002
  • +111/-100
  • Or should I?
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #124 on: May 21, 2016, 08:08:25 AM »
Are you saying the steam dissappears?

No, slow-poke, I am not.

But I am saying your ability to spell the word 'disappears' has disappeared...

Seems like a violation of conservation of literacy to me.

How thrillingly Satanic of you!

Typo, where does the steam go then?  Are you going to clarify or just continue trolling?
Why does my avatar scare you so much?
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #125 on: May 21, 2016, 10:48:09 AM »
What, the kind of 'casual education' that makes you lot think a rocket is somehow two separate objects?
Apparently the notion that one object can be made up of and/or contain a number of separate objects seems to be too advanced a concept for Papa Legba to grasp.

Which is ironic for someone who claims to be a builder.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

MouseWalker

  • 934
  • +0/-0
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #126 on: May 21, 2016, 12:08:44 PM »
I see that you are dodging the question.
To me this proves that you do not understand newtons laws.

I am not.

To me this proves you are a blind retard.
still Dodging the question and misdirecting,
I'm game.
=======
Buba Legbone appears to be running out of steam.

What would happen to a finite amount of steam if introduced to an infinite vacuum?

Plus lol.

Enjoying yourself there, Mr. Howard Beale?

You can try answering the above too if you like, Rainman?

Should be good for a laugh...

Or you could tell us if you like cats instead?

To answer the question we must defined the terms.
Infinite vacuum: a volume of space without limits and void of matter.
finite amount of steam: volume of water brought to hundred degrees centigrade at sea level.
Steam?: in a given volume a state of matter between liquid and gas, fewer particles per volume of liquid, more particles per volume then a gas.
hum the barometric pressure would determine the temperature of the steam. In a sense a cloud is steam.
Steam: water vapor suspended in air.
hum? what is the temperature of a vacuum? Absolute zero.
==
By God power, this volume of steam is added to the vacuum.
The local vacuum would longer be a vacuum.
The steam would immediate expand to gas, and continue to expand, polluting the vacuum.
At some point as temperatures reach absolute zero will gravity be sufficient to bring back the particles together, or will it continue to expand?
Infinite vacuum? No, we can now find matter, here and there, but still a vacuum.

The the universe has no obligation to makes sense to you.
The earth is a globe.

*

disputeone

  • 28002
  • +111/-100
  • Or should I?
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #127 on: May 21, 2016, 07:05:32 PM »
Seeing a recurring theme from Papa.

Step one: Makes wild assertion.

Step two: Asks open ended questions that are more like riddles.

Step three: Tells the people trying to answer what they think he's asking they're wrong.

Step four: Copy and paste "wrong" answers.

Step five: Never clarify questions or expain his difference in opinion.

Step six: Cries himself to sleep.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2016, 07:09:02 PM by disputeone »
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #128 on: May 21, 2016, 10:24:49 PM »
Apparently the notion that one object can be made up of and/or contain a number of separate objects seems to be too advanced a concept for Papa Legba to grasp.

Why do you lot post things then refuse to comprehend them?

Read the definition of N3 below & see if you can find where your silly little cavil has been addressed...

Where's Wally, retards?

One rocket, one object, Newtons third law says it's an interaction between two objects.

Clever boy!

Papa, can you explain to me how rockets work in our atmosphere?

Yes:

Newton's Third Law

Identifying Action and Reaction Force Pairs

A force is a push or a pull that acts upon an object as a results of its interaction with another object. Forces result from interactions!

Examples of Interaction Force Pairs
A variety of action-reaction force pairs are evident in nature. Consider the propulsion of a fish through the water. A fish uses its fins to push water backwards. But a push on the water will only serve to accelerate the water. Since forces result from mutual interactions, the water must also be pushing the fish forwards, propelling the fish through the water. The size of the force on the water equals the size of the force on the fish; the direction of the force on the water (backwards) is opposite the direction of the force on the fish (forwards). For every action, there is an equal (in size) and opposite (in direction) reaction force. Action-reaction force pairs make it possible for fish to swim.

Consider the flying motion of birds. A bird flies by use of its wings. The wings of a bird push air downwards. Since forces result from mutual interactions, the air must also be pushing the bird upwards. The size of the force on the air equals the size of the force on the bird; the direction of the force on the air (downwards) is opposite the direction of the force on the bird (upwards). For every action, there is an equal (in size) and opposite (in direction) reaction. Action-reaction force pairs make it possible for birds to fly.

Consider the motion of a car on the way to school. A car is equipped with wheels that spin. As the wheels spin, they grip the road and push the road backwards. Since forces result from mutual interactions, the road must also be pushing the wheels forward. The size of the force on the road equals the size of the force on the wheels (or car); the direction of the force on the road (backwards) is opposite the direction of the force on the wheels (forwards). For every action, there is an equal (in size) and opposite (in direction) reaction. Action-reaction force pairs make it possible for cars to move along a roadway surface.


I understand the above perfectly.

Do you?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #129 on: May 21, 2016, 11:03:51 PM »
Apparently the notion that one object can be made up of and/or contain a number of separate objects seems to be too advanced a concept for Papa Legba to grasp.

Why do you lot post things then refuse to comprehend them?

Read the definition of N3 below & see if you can find where your silly little cavil has been addressed...
So you agree that the pressure of the exhaust gasses pushing against the walls of the rocket engine's combustion chamber constitutes a force pair?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #130 on: May 21, 2016, 11:28:23 PM »
Where's Wally, markjo?

Couldn't find him so you changed the subject, did you?

Where's wally, markjo?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #131 on: May 22, 2016, 02:03:39 AM »
I know Newton's 3rd Law!
Just for Papa!

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #132 on: May 22, 2016, 07:19:35 AM »
Couldn't find him so you changed the subject, did you?
Newton's third law, and your lack of understanding of it, is the subject, in case you forgot.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #133 on: May 22, 2016, 07:58:05 AM »
Apparently the notion that one object can be made up of and/or contain a number of separate objects seems to be too advanced a concept for Papa Legba to grasp.

Where's Wally, markjo?

Do you see him?

I see Wally, markjo!

I see him!

There's Wally markjo!

There he is!

Wally's in the CAR!

Consider the motion of a car on the way to school. A car is equipped with wheels that spin. As the wheels spin, they grip the road and push the road backwards. Since forces result from mutual interactions, the road must also be pushing the wheels forward. The size of the force on the road equals the size of the force on the wheels (or car); the direction of the force on the road (backwards) is opposite the direction of the force on the wheels (forwards). For every action, there is an equal (in size) and opposite (in direction) reaction. Action-reaction force pairs make it possible for cars to move along a roadway surface.

LOL!!!

What a retard you are...
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #134 on: May 22, 2016, 08:07:16 AM »
Consider the motion of a car on the way to school. A car is equipped with wheels that spin. As the wheels spin, they grip the road and push the road backwards. Since forces result from mutual interactions, the road must also be pushing the wheels forward. The size of the force on the road equals the size of the force on the wheels (or car); the direction of the force on the road (backwards) is opposite the direction of the force on the wheels (forwards). For every action, there is an equal (in size) and opposite (in direction) reaction. Action-reaction force pairs make it possible for cars to move along a roadway surface.

So you agree that the pressure of the exhaust gasses pushing against the walls of the rocket engine's combustion chamber constitutes a force pair?

Tire acts against road, road reacts against tire.  Exhaust gasses act against rocket engine, rocket engine reacts against exhaust gasses.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #135 on: May 22, 2016, 11:22:45 AM »
Tire acts against road, road reacts against tire.  Exhaust gasses act against rocket engine, rocket engine reacts against exhaust gasses.

That's the way you interpret N3?

This 'cracked cuecaine' must be a helluva drug; tell us more about your experiences with it.

As well as your experiences of being a 'Content (i.e. happy) Nazi', Mr. Crack Hitler.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #136 on: May 22, 2016, 12:14:49 PM »
Tire acts against road, road reacts against tire.  Exhaust gasses act against rocket engine, rocket engine reacts against exhaust gasses.

That's the way you interpret N3?
Yes, because it's the correct way.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #137 on: May 22, 2016, 12:57:39 PM »
No it isn't.

It's mad shit you're making up off the top of your head, Mr. Mad Crack Hitler.

Enough of your nonsense; I will now mock you with Freemasonic code-phrases that are way above your initiation level, just because I can...

Do you obey the Thumb of God, Mr. Hard Gay Crack Hitler markjo?

The Thumb of God?

Is it your Master?

Hmm?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #138 on: May 22, 2016, 01:05:33 PM »
"Exhaust stacking"

Lol
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #139 on: May 22, 2016, 03:24:00 PM »
No it isn't.
Of course it is.  As you like to point out, Force = pressure x area.  Well, the pressure of burning fuel and oxidizer pushes against the surface area of the combustion chamber resulting in a force.  Sounds like a force pairing to me.

Since the pressure of the burning propellant acts in all directions and there is a hole in the combustion chamber, that would result in an unbalanced force.  An unbalanced force sounds like acceleration to me.

Ask Wally who he agrees with.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

disputeone

  • 28002
  • +111/-100
  • Or should I?
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #140 on: May 22, 2016, 08:43:51 PM »


Check it out Papa, good example of an action reaction force pair in a vacuum.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #141 on: May 22, 2016, 11:33:37 PM »
"Exhaust stacking"

the pressure of burning fuel and oxidizer pushes against the surface area of the combustion chamber resulting in a force.

good example of an action reaction force pair in a vacuum.

More mad bullshit you're all pulling out your arses...

Time for further Freemasonic taunting that you're too lowly to understand.

What Locks the Keystone, Losers?

Are your Keystones Locked?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

disputeone

  • 28002
  • +111/-100
  • Or should I?
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #142 on: May 22, 2016, 11:57:13 PM »
If you think it's fake why not do the experiment yourself instead of throwing out masonic phrases you aren't even getting right?

Would make you look much more intelligent.
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #143 on: May 23, 2016, 12:14:56 AM »
Why should I do an experiment that is irrelevant to the topic?

And how do you know I'm getting Masonic code-phrases wrong, Brother?

Any more mad shit you'd like to waste my time with, you pathetic faux-Satanic tool?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

Pezevenk

  • 15923
  • +69/-57
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #144 on: May 23, 2016, 12:29:22 AM »
Buba Legbone appears to be running out of steam.

What would happen to a finite amount of steam if introduced to an infinite vacuum?

Plus lol.

Enjoying yourself there, Mr. Howard Beale?

You can try answering the above too if you like, Rainman?

Should be good for a laugh...

Or you could tell us if you like cats instead?

I do like cats. This question is every bit as relevant as the one about the steam.
Member of the BOTD for Anti Fascism and Racism

It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from
-Intikam (again)

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #145 on: May 23, 2016, 12:54:33 AM »
This question is every bit as relevant as the one about the steam.

Incorrect.

For what do Hypergolic rocket propellants produce if not a form of steam?

And what was the Aeolipile if not a primitive, fixed, form of steam-rocket?

So the behaviour of steam in a vacuum is very much relevant to the non-debate & fake poll in the wrong part of the forum that you Clowns have spazzed up for the misinformation of all...
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

disputeone

  • 28002
  • +111/-100
  • Or should I?
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #146 on: May 23, 2016, 01:12:12 AM »
Why should I do an experiment that is irrelevant to the topic?

And how do you know I'm getting Masonic code-phrases wrong, Brother?

Any more mad shit you'd like to waste my time with, you pathetic faux-Satanic tool?

I feel it is quite relevant, the way the bullet propels itself in a vacuum is very similar to how a rocket propels itself.

I sincerely hope you are just quoting youtube videos, also I am not and will never be your "brother".
Why would that be inciting terrorism?  Lorddave was merely describing a type of shop we have here in the US, a bomb-gun shop.  A shop that sells bomb-guns.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #147 on: May 23, 2016, 03:25:44 AM »
This question is every bit as relevant as the one about the steam.

Incorrect.

For what do Hypergolic rocket propellants produce if not a form of steam?

And what was the Aeolipile if not a primitive, fixed, form of steam-rocket?

So the behaviour of steam in a vacuum is very much relevant to the non-debate & fake poll in the wrong part of the forum that you Clowns have spazzed up for the misinformation of all...
Don't know why you chose hypergolic propellants?
The most common is Hydrazine with the chemical formula N2H4 with an oxidiser of either nitrogen tetroxide N2O4 or nitric acid HNO3. All very nasty chemicals.

Sure, you'll get some steam, plus lots of other stuff.

These days hyperbolic fuels are used only as igniters for other fuels or in small manoeuvring rockets.

If you want steam as the exhaust why not good old LH2 + LOX - combustion product pure super heated steam.

But of course you couldn't then show off your big words.

Yes the Aeolipile is a beautiful example of a reaction engine demonstrating Newton's 3rd Law nicely.
Smart of you to find it.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • +0/-0
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #148 on: May 23, 2016, 03:32:02 AM »
All of which wiki-spam has precisely nothing to do with the behaviour of steam in a vacuum.

So STFU, Geoff.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

SkepticMike

  • 415
  • +0/-0
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #149 on: May 23, 2016, 04:03:10 AM »
All of which wiki-spam has precisely nothing to do with the behaviour of steam in a vacuum.

So STFU, Geoff.

Do you have textured skin like leather in the sun?
Turkish joke. A prisoner goes to the jail's library to borrow a book. The librarian says: "We don't have this book, but we have its author"