Poll

Does Papa Legba understand newtons third law?

No
67 (87%)
Yes
10 (13%)

Total Members Voted: 73

Newtons third law

  • 1644 Replies
  • 59854 Views
*

Bullwinkle

  • Flat Earth Curator
  • 17699
  • "Umm, WTF ???"
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1620 on: July 21, 2016, 01:53:58 AM »
What is thrust?...Explain what thrust is and how you gain it from your vacuum chamber.


You should offer up some gold nuggets to anyone who can teach you something.
Then we can all laugh at you the way we laugh at Hiawa.   :P
RE can never win this argument.
FE can't be disproved.

?

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 23254
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1621 on: July 21, 2016, 02:49:43 AM »
What is thrust?...Explain what thrust is and how you gain it from your vacuum chamber.


You should offer up some gold nuggets to anyone who can teach you something.
Then we can all laugh at you the way we laugh at Hiawa.   :P
I seriously doubt that you people know what thrust is. That's why I ask the question.
I don't expect the likes of you to grasp any of it. You're just a clown.

?

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 23254
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1622 on: July 21, 2016, 03:07:30 AM »
And I'll just add this:
If a rockets engine requires leverage against atmosphere to create thrust. Why do they gain thrust as they gain altitude?

Surely it would loose thrust as the atmosphere gets less and less dense and thus less molecules to create the leverage against.
They don't gain thrust as they gain altitude. They lose thrust but keep a normal speed due to fuel burn, making the rocket lighter with every vertical push into and against, atmosphere.

Apart from air density at 80,000 metres is over 1 hundred thousand times less than ground level.

All vacuum engines are tested in vacuum chambers. And they all give out more thrust in a vacuum than in atmosphere.
How in the hell can you test a vacuum engine inside a vacuum chamber without it ceasing to become a vacuum chamber?

Also, what the hell is a vacuum engine?

What is thrust?...Explain what thrust is and how you gain it from your vacuum chamber.

They have tested a variety of rocket engines at plumb brook. It is the largest vacuum chamber in the world. Used to test rockets at simulated altitude and has been used to test rockets in a vacuum aswell.

Thrust is equal to:
F = m dot * Ve + (pe - p0) * Ae
m dot=mass flow rate
ve=exhaust velocity
pe=exhaust pressure
po=Atmospheric pressure
Ae=Area

The main reason it functions better in a vacuum is. Ve (exhaust velocity) There is no/little back pressure restriction on the exhaust so exhaust mass can flow easier and faster in a vacuum resulting in a higher thrust.

The reason why it is called a vacuum engine is the Ae or (nozzle area) is much larger than an atmospheric engine. The reasoning is because a rocket nozzle is most efficent when nozzle pressure is equal to external (atmospheric pressure). They are designed to have the largest area nozzle possible without adding too much mass to the craft in a vacuum situation. This is to keep the nozzle pressure as close to zero and as efficient as it possibly can in a vacuum.
Unbelievably contradicting.

*

Pezevenk

  • 13727
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1623 on: July 21, 2016, 03:13:44 AM »
And I'll just add this:
If a rockets engine requires leverage against atmosphere to create thrust. Why do they gain thrust as they gain altitude?

Surely it would loose thrust as the atmosphere gets less and less dense and thus less molecules to create the leverage against.
They don't gain thrust as they gain altitude. They lose thrust but keep a normal speed due to fuel burn, making the rocket lighter with every vertical push into and against, atmosphere.

Apart from air density at 80,000 metres is over 1 hundred thousand times less than ground level.

All vacuum engines are tested in vacuum chambers. And they all give out more thrust in a vacuum than in atmosphere.
How in the hell can you test a vacuum engine inside a vacuum chamber without it ceasing to become a vacuum chamber?

Also, what the hell is a vacuum engine?

What is thrust?...Explain what thrust is and how you gain it from your vacuum chamber.

They have tested a variety of rocket engines at plumb brook. It is the largest vacuum chamber in the world. Used to test rockets at simulated altitude and has been used to test rockets in a vacuum aswell.

Thrust is equal to:
F = m dot * Ve + (pe - p0) * Ae
m dot=mass flow rate
ve=exhaust velocity
pe=exhaust pressure
po=Atmospheric pressure
Ae=Area

The main reason it functions better in a vacuum is. Ve (exhaust velocity) There is no/little back pressure restriction on the exhaust so exhaust mass can flow easier and faster in a vacuum resulting in a higher thrust.

The reason why it is called a vacuum engine is the Ae or (nozzle area) is much larger than an atmospheric engine. The reasoning is because a rocket nozzle is most efficent when nozzle pressure is equal to external (atmospheric pressure). They are designed to have the largest area nozzle possible without adding too much mass to the craft in a vacuum situation. This is to keep the nozzle pressure as close to zero and as efficient as it possibly can in a vacuum.
Unbelievably contradicting.

How so?

Also, the thrust of a rocket is the reaction to the force with which the rocket expels mass, namely the force which accelerates the rocket. Satisfied now?
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

rabinoz

  • 23782
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1624 on: July 21, 2016, 03:31:30 AM »
What is thrust?...Explain what thrust is and how you gain it from your vacuum chamber.


You should offer up some gold nuggets to anyone who can teach you something.
Then we can all laugh at you the way we laugh at Hiawa.   :P
I seriously doubt that you people know what thrust is. That's why I ask the question.
I don't expect the likes of you to grasp any of it. You're just a clown.

Bullwinkle, sceppy's really got your measure now with his  ;D "You're just a clown."   ;D
It's so unlike sceppy to offer such compliments! What's come over him?   

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1625 on: July 21, 2016, 12:52:06 PM »
This subject has nothing to do with the earth being flat, nor is is a 'debate'.

Ergo it is bullshit from the get-go...

False dialectic bullshit on a proven shill-forum.

Fuck off the lot of you.

Back to real science; this is all you'll get from now on:

A rocket in space very much resembles a pressurised vessel separated from a vacuum by a valve.

Which is remarkably similar to the conditions of the Joule free expansion experiment.

Once the valve of the Joule expansion experiment was opened, the pressurised gas released into the vacuum was found to do no work.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/j150043a002

http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/node33.html

http://www.etomica.org/app/modules/sites/JouleThomson/Background2.html

This proves a gas-powered rocket would also do no work in a vacuum.

PROVES, markjo.

Here is the definition of 'work':

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/work.html

No work=no force=no movement.

Game fucking over shills.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1626 on: July 21, 2016, 01:14:58 PM »
conservation of momentum:

mass of fuel burned*speed burned fuel is ejected=mass of spacecraft*delta-v of rocket.

If you burn 50 kg of fuel and it ejects at 1000 m/s, and your rocket weighs 5000 kg, it would change the rocket's velocity by 10 m/s
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1627 on: July 21, 2016, 01:21:01 PM »
You dumb fucking prick...

How DARE you suggest that an experiment designed specifically to CONFIRM conservation of energy, & thus conservation of momentum, somehow defies it?

How fucking DARE you?!?

Just fuck off, shill.

Again:

This subject has nothing to do with the earth being flat, nor is is a 'debate'.

Ergo it is bullshit from the get-go...

False dialectic bullshit on a proven shill-forum.

Fuck off the lot of you.

Back to real science; this is all you'll get from now on:

A rocket in space very much resembles a pressurised vessel separated from a vacuum by a valve.

Which is remarkably similar to the conditions of the Joule free expansion experiment.

Once the valve of the Joule expansion experiment was opened, the pressurised gas released into the vacuum was found to do no work.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/j150043a002

http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/node33.html

http://www.etomica.org/app/modules/sites/JouleThomson/Background2.html

This proves a gas-powered rocket would also do no work in a vacuum.

PROVES, markjo.

Here is the definition of 'work':

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/work.html

No work=no force=no movement.

Game fucking over shills.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1628 on: July 21, 2016, 01:25:36 PM »
Papa lying again. Using useless information claiming it as fact.

Joules free expansion has more to do with a refrigeration system than it does a rocket.

I think it's about time you received a 24/7 ban.


?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1629 on: July 21, 2016, 01:28:24 PM »
You are a truly sick individual.

This subject has nothing to do with the earth being flat, nor is is a 'debate'.

Ergo it is bullshit from the get-go...

False dialectic bullshit on a proven shill-forum.

Fuck off the lot of you.

Back to real science; this is all you'll get from now on:

A rocket in space very much resembles a pressurised vessel separated from a vacuum by a valve.

Which is remarkably similar to the conditions of the Joule free expansion experiment.

Once the valve of the Joule expansion experiment was opened, the pressurised gas released into the vacuum was found to do no work.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/j150043a002

http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/node33.html

http://www.etomica.org/app/modules/sites/JouleThomson/Background2.html

This proves a gas-powered rocket would also do no work in a vacuum.

PROVES, markjo.

Here is the definition of 'work':

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/work.html

No work=no force=no movement.

Game fucking over shills.

I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1630 on: July 21, 2016, 01:59:33 PM »
You don't know what that experiment is experimenting about. You have misinterpreted it. Just like you don't understand Newton's Three laws.

Please, Copy/Paste that a few more times! It is really funny!
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1631 on: July 21, 2016, 10:02:16 PM »
^Lies.

This subject has nothing to do with the earth being flat, nor is is a 'debate'.

Ergo it is bullshit from the get-go...

False dialectic bullshit on a proven shill-forum.

Fuck off the lot of you.

Back to real science; this is all you'll get from now on:

A rocket in space very much resembles a pressurised vessel separated from a vacuum by a valve.

Which is remarkably similar to the conditions of the Joule free expansion experiment.

Once the valve of the Joule expansion experiment was opened, the pressurised gas released into the vacuum was found to do no work.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/j150043a002

http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/node33.html

http://www.etomica.org/app/modules/sites/JouleThomson/Background2.html

This proves a gas-powered rocket would also do no work in a vacuum.

PROVES, markjo.

Here is the definition of 'work':

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/work.html

No work=no force=no movement.

Game fucking over shills.

I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1632 on: July 21, 2016, 10:03:33 PM »
now the muppet is shouting. That will make everybody take it seriously.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1633 on: July 21, 2016, 10:20:21 PM »
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This is the DENPRESSURE law.
What does "equal and opposite" mean in 3(4?)-dimensional space? 
How is the law proven to be true?  How can it be observed in action? or verified? 

What is a reaction? 
When does a reaction start?  or end? 

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8478
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1634 on: July 21, 2016, 10:32:50 PM »
I moved this because he is right that the topic is neither debate or directly FET related, and seems to mostly be a way to harrass him.


"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1635 on: July 22, 2016, 09:20:28 AM »
You moved it because you are a shill & did not want non-members to be able to view it you silly little fraud.

Because I was correct all along & you know it.

Your other fraud-mod shill ID, tehEnjynerr, did exactly the same thing before disappearing.

Thanks for proving beyond any shadow of a doubt that you are a shill & this is a shill-run forum though.

Toodle-pip, shithead!
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1636 on: July 22, 2016, 03:02:57 PM »
haha.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

Pezevenk

  • 13727
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1637 on: July 24, 2016, 06:28:48 AM »
I moved this because he is right that the topic is neither debate or directly FET related, and seems to mostly be a way to harrass him.

Awww fuck off ski, you're killing the fun!
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

disputeone

  • Ranters
  • 16482
  • Or should I?
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1638 on: July 24, 2016, 06:24:36 PM »
Agree with DNO.
For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this.

The reason I am consistently personally attacked here.
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=69306.msg1960160#msg1960160

Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1639 on: July 24, 2016, 07:57:56 PM »
Dsputeone, culdn't you just move it back?
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

disputeone

  • Ranters
  • 16482
  • Or should I?
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1640 on: July 24, 2016, 08:26:28 PM »
Apparently yes, moved from angry ranting to Science and Alt science.

I originally posted it in the debate section hoping people would follow a debate structure.
For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this.

The reason I am consistently personally attacked here.
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=69306.msg1960160#msg1960160

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40533
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1641 on: July 25, 2016, 09:24:28 AM »
Maybe someday you guys will give up on trying to bait a troll and then have an intelligent debate? I'm talking about the stupid poll, that was just asking for nonsense.


I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8478
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1642 on: July 25, 2016, 09:31:41 PM »

Awww fuck off ski, you're killing the fun!

 :P
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

*

disputeone

  • Ranters
  • 16482
  • Or should I?
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1643 on: July 25, 2016, 11:15:18 PM »
Maybe someday you guys will give up on trying to bait a troll and then have an intelligent debate? I'm talking about the stupid poll, that was just asking for nonsense.

Me?? Asking for nonsense on a flat earth website?? Never...
For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this.

The reason I am consistently personally attacked here.
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=69306.msg1960160#msg1960160

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40533
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Newtons third law
« Reply #1644 on: July 26, 2016, 08:51:38 AM »
Maybe someday you guys will give up on trying to bait a troll and then have an intelligent debate? I'm talking about the stupid poll, that was just asking for nonsense.

Me?? Asking for nonsense on a flat earth website?? Never...

You wanted nonsense in a debate structure, WEIRDO.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.