If only you could offer any evidence to support your claims. Sadly you cannot. All you can say is, it doesn't feel right or I don't understand it so it must be some vast conspiracy to hide the truth. You do this to help yourself feel important. Understandable, but sad nonetheless.
The claims are from NASA that they went to the moon and back.
You do understand that, don't you ? Because you must be one of the worst readers i encountered on the various forums on the internet.
But i'll repeat it nevertheless : NASA claimed to have gone to the moon and the evidence is :
Footage
Testimonies
Technology that worked
And of course much more that i could address later.......
There shouldn't be a debate whatsoever when the 3 things mentioned were genuine.
FootageNASA and their Clavius fanbase claim that each and every possible claim of a studio set up is debunked with facts.
However, David Percy, David Groves, Marcus Allen all showed long lists of inconsistancies in the footage.
Of course rediculed by the NASA fanbase, but the persons above have earned their credentials more than Jay Utah and his boys (Clavius)
Even Uri Geller, a friend of Edgar Mitchell, has said that some of the footage was clearly faked !
Massimo Mazzucco is interviewing the top dogs in film and photography and asks them about their opinion about the NASA Apollo footage on display.
He also interviewed those working in the days with film and material used in the early seventies.
In a sneak preview it becomes clear that the Apollo footage is indeed fraudulent....but i wll post it as soon as the docu involving
top experts is ready for general use.
Then persons much better qualified than dutchy or the Clavius amatures under the leadership from Jay Utah WILL comment on the Apollo footage.
And then you can decide if their comments about the Apollo footage is trustworthy or not !!!
TestimoniesExplained it numerous times....what stars could be seen in cislunar space from the cabine's window is extremely different on Apollo 11 compared to Apollo 17.
False testimonies
Buzz Alldrin testifies 3 times in history about some light following the capsule.
version 1 : we couldn't say Housten there's an unindentified object following us, so we covered it up a bit, but we were puzzled by this phenomena
version 2 : it could be some loose material from the capsule with reflected sunlight
version 3 : it was as clear as anything from the moment we saw it that something got loose....never mentioned ufo's.
This is my own quick explaination, because i don't have time to search for the precise words, which i have done in a previous topic about it,.....but to get an idea of Buzz the liar.
And i could continue for more, but you get the basic idea !
Pete Conrad wanted, according to Bill Kaysing, clean his concious and called with Bill Kaysing.
He recently became a reborn christian and couldn't live with the lie anymore.
Two days before the two met, he died in a motorcycle accident.
Of course in NASA land ''anti NASA'' persons make such insane offending stories up,....but i believe Bill Kaysing for telling the truth !!
TechnologiesDestroyed technologies (Don Pettit)
Still testing the hazards of the Van Allen Belts (Orion) before they will send men through the VAB
Moondust that covered the astronauts (thick layer) that entered the LM unwanted. Absolutely out of the question and every future ''moon'' design does not allow for such forms of negligence. It is not the question what happens, but that it
will sabotage delicate equipment onboard.
All prior hyphotesis in rocket design were no longer needed when they had to go to the moon.
No rocket the size of the Intire State building, not half a meter concrete to protect the capsule from radiation, but thin allu and MLI instead.
The list is endless, but i will pause for a moment......