Dinosaurs: Made In China

  • 1009 Replies
  • 191679 Views
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17873
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #180 on: May 26, 2016, 07:15:58 AM »
Even if he was a lie, you are still left with the realization that 'he' then was real enough to shape Western culture for the majority of its existence and that it served as a Moralistic Revolution for the time
What is the Moralistic Revolution?   Despite the capitalization, it appears to be neologism on your part.
His were a set of morals that changed the western world and the view of morality there itself, much like in the field of Math non-euclidean geometry changed the view, and in science Galileo did, and in art post-modernism did.
"You are a very reasonable man John." - D1

"The lunatic, the lover, and the poet. Are of imagination all compact" - The Bard

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3608
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #181 on: May 26, 2016, 09:45:56 AM »
As do I. Even though I believe in Yehushua and Yahweh, you won't see me step foot in a church. Forgot the corruption obsession with power and control. Once you know the history that's enough for me.

I had never heard of the fight between the sects you were speaking of. That is why I was asking where you read that.

I see I have been sigged. I'm not sure if its a complement or mockery but I won't let it bother me if its the latter.
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #182 on: May 26, 2016, 11:42:36 AM »

A full dinosaur skeleton has never been found





Hands up anyone who thinks Davis knows what he's talking about.
Founder member of the League Of Scientific Gentlemen and Mademoiselles des Connaissances.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17873
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #183 on: May 26, 2016, 11:46:07 AM »
Great some pictures of birds in rock. From Paleontology's track record they are likely half fake anyways.

This brings to mind the most complete T-Rex they ever found. I think her name was 'Susan." They paid some Indian farmer who clearly faked it 5000$. Comments: "I knew before we even moved a shovel of dirt that in the ground was the most special skeleton we have found" or some such, from memory.
"You are a very reasonable man John." - D1

"The lunatic, the lover, and the poet. Are of imagination all compact" - The Bard

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3608
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #184 on: May 26, 2016, 12:12:51 PM »
Great some pictures of birds in rock. From Paleontology's track record they are likely half fake anyways.

This brings to mind the most complete T-Rex they ever found. I think her name was 'Susan." They paid some Indian farmer who clearly faked it 5000$. Comments: "I knew before we even moved a shovel of dirt that in the ground was the most special skeleton we have found" or some such, from memory.

Why should we find complete dinosaur skeletons? You realize that these are old (whether you believe they are millions of years old or 4,400) and any decomposing body would eventually be dis articulated.
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17873
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #185 on: May 26, 2016, 12:19:56 PM »
I might as well ask you why we should find a missing link? IF the timeline is 4,400 years we should be finding complete bodies all over the place.

Isn't it odd that some of the first dinosaurs we found were supposedly complete, except for their head?! And then their heads were faked to look like Iguanas? I suppose it wouldn't have been as suited for display in their houses.

Why would we find random parts to dinosaurs and not their whole body. If one part ages, every part ages. Sure some parts might decompose faster, but then it would be uniform across the species - we'd have no legs for any dinosaurs of type x, for example.
"You are a very reasonable man John." - D1

"The lunatic, the lover, and the poet. Are of imagination all compact" - The Bard

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3608
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #186 on: May 26, 2016, 12:27:51 PM »
I might as well ask you why we should find a missing link? IF the timeline is 4,400 years we should be finding complete bodies all over the place.

We've really only stracthed the surface (literally) when it comes to digging. Most of the digging now is done by machines and hardly anyone watches what comes out.
Quote
Isn't it odd that some of the first dinosaurs we found were supposedly complete, except for their head?! And then their heads were faked to look like Iguanas? I suppose it wouldn't have been as suited for display in their houses.

How do you know they faked the head?

Quote
Why would we find random parts to dinosaurs and not their whole body. If one part ages, every part ages. Sure some parts might decompose faster, but then it would be uniform across the species - we'd have no legs for any dinosaurs of type x, for example.

You're assuming that we don't find the heads, if the dinosaurs died from a massive violent flood then you wouldn't have perfectly preserved bodies. All of the fossils are found in sedimentary rock indicating flooding.
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17873
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #187 on: May 26, 2016, 12:33:01 PM »
I might as well ask you why we should find a missing link? IF the timeline is 4,400 years we should be finding complete bodies all over the place.

We've really only stracthed the surface (literally) when it comes to digging. Most of the digging now is done by machines and hardly anyone watches what comes out.
Quote
Isn't it odd that some of the first dinosaurs we found were supposedly complete, except for their head?! And then their heads were faked to look like Iguanas? I suppose it wouldn't have been as suited for display in their houses.

How do you know they faked the head?

Quote
Why would we find random parts to dinosaurs and not their whole body. If one part ages, every part ages. Sure some parts might decompose faster, but then it would be uniform across the species - we'd have no legs for any dinosaurs of type x, for example.

You're assuming that we don't find the heads, if the dinosaurs died from a massive violent flood then you wouldn't have perfectly preserved bodies. All of the fossils are found in sedimentary rock indicating flooding.

We know the head is faked because they found out it was faked later. I'll find the source when I get a bit of extra time.


The flood explanation isn't bad, I agree. It certainly ties in with Dome theory and canopy flood theory.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2016, 12:43:47 PM by John Davis »
"You are a very reasonable man John." - D1

"The lunatic, the lover, and the poet. Are of imagination all compact" - The Bard

*

FalseProphet

  • 3696
  • Life is just a tale
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #188 on: May 26, 2016, 01:59:28 PM »

That makes zero sense. A circular boat with granite top?

Just popped in my head, the story was the epic of Gilgamesh, and the material was slate not granite.

Yes it is rediculous, the design was not even remotely see worthy, even heiwa would be able to figure that out.

That is my point, counterfeits only hold up until you look at the details.

The story in the bible is later and more modern than the Babylonian one. That's why it's more realistic. But I see, you believe in bible stuff, can't argue with people like you.

Is it because I don't just accept things blindly. Yes I have stated my beliefs, though in a debate I can keep that under lock and key for the debates sake.

As far as I know , I have presented no bias here thus far.

Dating of the story itself, Noah's ark predated it.


No bias... ::)

Quote
Dating the evidence of the written copies of it , that is debatable. Some accounts show 600bc , though some pots found push for 2000 BC. However, at the same time, there have been recent pots discovered that push for 3000 BC for parts of the old testament, written in the newly discovered original form of Hebrew. They didn't even know it was Hebrew at first.

Just when you think you know it all, you're wrong. Discovering new things everyday.

That's a load of half-informed shit.

You better not teach me about ancient languages, cause they are my job.

You better not


*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #189 on: May 26, 2016, 04:28:42 PM »

I see I have been sigged. I'm not sure if its a complement or mockery but I won't let it bother me if its the latter.

No it's not an insult. I knew exactly what you were saying when you used this quote. I use a form of it often, as I agree, in everything there is always some truth and foundation.

Just the way you put it sounded funny but makes sense at the same time.
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #190 on: May 26, 2016, 05:00:42 PM »

That makes zero sense. A circular boat with granite top?

Just popped in my head, the story was the epic of Gilgamesh, and the material was slate not granite.

Yes it is rediculous, the design was not even remotely see worthy, even heiwa would be able to figure that out.

That is my point, counterfeits only hold up until you look at the details.

The story in the bible is later and more modern than the Babylonian one. That's why it's more realistic. But I see, you believe in bible stuff, can't argue with people like you.

Is it because I don't just accept things blindly. Yes I have stated my beliefs, though in a debate I can keep that under lock and key for the debates sake.

As far as I know , I have presented no bias here thus far.

Dating of the story itself, Noah's ark predated it.


No bias... ::)

Quote
Dating the evidence of the written copies of it , that is debatable. Some accounts show 600bc , though some pots found push for 2000 BC. However, at the same time, there have been recent pots discovered that push for 3000 BC for parts of the old testament, written in the newly discovered original form of Hebrew. They didn't even know it was Hebrew at first.

Just when you think you know it all, you're wrong. Discovering new things everyday.

That's a load of half-informed shit.

You better not teach me about ancient languages, cause they are my job.

You better not


I am not teaching you about anything...just stating facts. The time the two stories were said to take place, Noah's ark predated Gilgamesh. That is an easy fact needing no bias.

Also stated the actually written stories themselves dating has ranged from 600 to 2000 BC (the actual currently discovered written parts, pots, scribes ect)..there has been a wide degree of variation and disagreement in the dating.

There was also those pots that were discovered very recently that they are coming to the realization after study that it could be the original version Hebrew . They are estimating the pots date to estimated 3000bc.

So I don't see the issue with stating any of these, I certainly do not deal with ancient languages as a profession, it's just a hobby.


Also you stated alot of info couple pages back, I asked for a citation, and you said it's just info you have picked up along the line. Which I understand of course, but let's not start throwing stones here when there is alot of glass around
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

FalseProphet

  • 3696
  • Life is just a tale
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #191 on: May 26, 2016, 05:39:49 PM »
You mayby mean the pots with Proto- Canaanite spells written in Egyptian script. They are from the 3rd millenium BC, indeed very old, but only Discovery Channel would call it "Original Hebrew", though it is a precursor of Hebrew. Like Latin is the precursor of French, yet you would not call it the original French. From Proto-Canaanite also derives Phoenician, Ugaritic and Aramaic.   It has nothing to do with a flood story.

The Biblical flood story was written in the 1st half of the 1st millenium BC. It certainly draws from older sources, but they are not extant. We do not have older written accounts of the flood story in Hebrew. not on papyrus, nor on pot. On the other hand the oldest written accounts of the Mesopotamian flood story are from the 3rd millenium BC. So they are clearly older.

I know you think, you just tell me facts.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2016, 07:00:24 PM by FalseProphet »

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11803
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #192 on: May 26, 2016, 06:45:52 PM »

That makes zero sense. A circular boat with granite top?

Just popped in my head, the story was the epic of Gilgamesh, and the material was slate not granite.

Yes it is rediculous, the design was not even remotely see worthy, even heiwa would be able to figure that out.

That is my point, counterfeits only hold up until you look at the details.

The story in the bible is later and more modern than the Babylonian one. That's why it's more realistic. But I see, you believe in bible stuff, can't argue with people like you.

Is it because I don't just accept things blindly. Yes I have stated my beliefs, though in a debate I can keep that under lock and key for the debates sake.

As far as I know , I have presented no bias here thus far.

Dating of the story itself, Noah's ark predated it.


No bias... ::)

Quote
Dating the evidence of the written copies of it , that is debatable. Some accounts show 600bc , though some pots found push for 2000 BC. However, at the same time, there have been recent pots discovered that push for 3000 BC for parts of the old testament, written in the newly discovered original form of Hebrew. They didn't even know it was Hebrew at first.

Just when you think you know it all, you're wrong. Discovering new things everyday.

That's a load of half-informed shit.

You better not teach me about ancient languages, cause they are my job.

You better not

I'm surprised that you have enough inteligence to actually hold a job.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3608
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #193 on: May 26, 2016, 07:04:51 PM »

I see I have been sigged. I'm not sure if its a complement or mockery but I won't let it bother me if its the latter.

No it's not an insult. I knew exactly what you were saying when you used this quote. I use a form of it often, as I agree, in everything there is always some truth and foundation.

Just the way you put it sounded funny but makes sense at the same time.

Ok thanks. It was completely unintentional to make it funny but now that you pointed that out I can see the humor in it.
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #194 on: May 27, 2016, 04:06:56 AM »
You mayby mean the pots with Proto- Canaanite spells written in Egyptian script. They are from the 3rd millenium BC, indeed very old, but only Discovery Channel would call it "Original Hebrew", though it is a precursor of Hebrew. Like Latin is the precursor of French, yet you would not call it the original French. From Proto-Canaanite also derives Phoenician, Ugaritic and Aramaic.   It has nothing to do with a flood story.

The Biblical flood story was written in the 1st half of the 1st millenium BC. It certainly draws from older sources, but they are not extant. We do not have older written accounts of the flood story in Hebrew. not on papyrus, nor on pot. On the other hand the oldest written accounts of the Mesopotamian flood story are from the 3rd millenium BC. So they are clearly older.

I know you think, you just tell me facts.

Well I apologize for using the incorrect term on the "original Hebrew", as I said I do not do that as a profession. Though from even the information you posted sounds like I was correct in a simpleton fashion. I think jumping down my throat over a "incorrect" term that is still truthful is kind of rediculous don't you think?

 I see people try and speak about things from my industry all the time here, linguistically butchering things non stop. I know what they are trying to say, and I don't crap down their throats. I know there are not many people who do what I do, most people only have Google to learn about it if interested. I can appreciate that and understand, so I practice tolerance in conversation, instead of pointing out every verbal flaw.

I never said those pots had anything to do with the flood story, just thought they were an interesting find. Also some implications with their find.

I also said so far the oldest evidence of the Gilgamesh found predates Noah's. Though their are discrepancies in the dating of Gilgamesh. My whole point was according to the time line of the story itself, Noah's predates Gilgamesh.

I have stated this twice already, I love it when people here try to misquote me in saying I said something I didn't. That is Legba 101...have you been studying Legbaology ? I know you have to have good reading comprehension skills in the business you are in
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

FalseProphet

  • 3696
  • Life is just a tale
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #195 on: May 27, 2016, 05:26:51 AM »
I have no idea what you want to say. Why do you speak about pots with Semitic languages at all? What "implications" are you talking about? Why does it matter if Noah is older than Gilgamesh? The hero of the Sumerian fllood story is Utnapishtim. Who is older? That's a meaningless question, since both are legendary figures and this flood obviously never happened. And if it did, both were of the same time, since both survived the same flood.

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #196 on: May 27, 2016, 11:40:25 AM »
Great some pictures of birds in rock. From Paleontology's track record they are likely half fake anyways.
Here we see John ignore the considerable differences between modern bird skeletons and those in the pictures in order to claim that they are not dinosaurs. He then gives a get out clause by saying they are likely to be fake.
Again we see him carefully avoid addressing why a "faked" skeleton ends up in solid rock in the middle of nowhere and might be found by an amateur (let alone HOW the skeleton ends up in rock which is millions of years old?) He also carefully avoids admitting that I have completely disproved his statement that complete skeletons are never found.
Quote
This brings to mind the most complete T-Rex they ever found. I think her name was 'Susan." They paid some Indian farmer who clearly faked it 5000$. Comments: "I knew before we even moved a shovel of dirt that in the ground was the most special skeleton we have found" or some such, from memory.
This is a non sequitur.
Founder member of the League Of Scientific Gentlemen and Mademoiselles des Connaissances.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #197 on: May 27, 2016, 11:45:54 AM »
I might as well ask you why we should find a missing link? IF the timeline is 4,400 years we should be finding complete bodies all over the place.

We've really only stracthed the surface (literally) when it comes to digging. Most of the digging now is done by machines and hardly anyone watches what comes out.
Quote
Isn't it odd that some of the first dinosaurs we found were supposedly complete, except for their head?! And then their heads were faked to look like Iguanas? I suppose it wouldn't have been as suited for display in their houses.

How do you know they faked the head?

Quote
Why would we find random parts to dinosaurs and not their whole body. If one part ages, every part ages. Sure some parts might decompose faster, but then it would be uniform across the species - we'd have no legs for any dinosaurs of type x, for example.

You're assuming that we don't find the heads, if the dinosaurs died from a massive violent flood then you wouldn't have perfectly preserved bodies. All of the fossils are found in sedimentary rock indicating flooding.

We know the head is faked because they found out it was faked later. I'll find the source when I get a bit of extra time.


This is your logic: Some  paintings attributed to Van Gogh are actually fakes, and have been proved to be so beyond a shadow of doubt. Therefore, ALL Van Gogh paintings are fake, Van Gogh didn't exist, and all his output was created in Taiwan in 1978 by forgers.
Founder member of the League Of Scientific Gentlemen and Mademoiselles des Connaissances.
I am pompous, self-righteous, thin skinned, and smug.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17873
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #198 on: August 15, 2016, 04:04:21 AM »
Yes, Neil. If someone tries to sell you a Van Gogh, I would ensure its authenticity before I jump in on saying its the real deal.

Onward to the most pressing of matters! Including an earlier post for coherency.



On the Shoulders Of Giants

Giants are mentioned in the bible in several places. Genesis 6:4, Joshua 12:4, Deuteronomy 3:11, Numbers 13:30-33, 2 Samuel 21:19 and Deuteronomy 9:1-2.  Secondly we have strong archaeological evidence for giants. Archaeologists routinely find very large bones and weaponry that only a giant could have used. Areas like stonehenge could only have been created by giants, despite colourful tales of druids using logs to roll the stones used to create these calendars thousands of miles - a feet impossible in the old ages. Egyptians routinely gave us pictures of giants on their jars and tombs. The Book of Enoch also talks of giants as well as Jasher and the historical works of Josephus.

Charles Fort documented quite a bit of evidence for giants.
Quote
Notice of a stone ax, 17 inches long: 9 inches across broad end. (Proc. Soc. of Ants. of Scotland, 1-9-184.)
Copper ax from an Ohio mound: 22 inches long; weight 38 pounds. Amer. Anthropologist, n.s., 8-229:
Footprints, in sandstone, near Carson, Nevada—each print 18 to 20 inches long. (Amer. Jour. Sci., 3-26-139.)

As he puts it in Book of the Damned: ( http://www.sacred-texts.com/fort/damn/damn12.htm )
Quote
Except—that, no matter how cheerful and unsuspicious my disposition may be, when I go to the American Museum of Natural History, dark cynicisms arise the moment I come to the fossils—or old bones that have been found upon this earth—gigantic things—that have been reconstructed into terrifying but "proper" dinosaurs—but my uncheerfulness—

The dodo did it.

On one of the floors below the fossils, they have a reconstructed dodo. It's frankly a fiction: it's labeled as such—but it's been reconstructed so cleverly and so convincingly—

So where are these giants?

As Fort explains, in our museums, being paraded around as Dinosaurs, no doubt. During the great dinosaur rush crooked scientists (who also as mentioned earlier used spies, thieves and thugs) would find the bones of these giants and use them to piece together their fragmented ideas. On the shoulders of giants indeed!

Just take a look at the shots added below. Those bones that are not faked are from giants.

And this is where it all comes together folks. Why would the government hide such giants? And create dinosaurs?! Let us look a bit more into our history.


Related Images



Living Large

Recently an interesting video came out on youtube by user Людин Рɣси. In it, the claim is made that there are no forests on flat earth. Please enjoy:



Within, he gives compelling evidence that the Earth used to be a gigantic forest. No, really gigantic. No, think bigger.

Unnatural percentages of Carbon Dioxide and Water in southern extremities hints to worldwide fire destroying 99% of bioplane. This points to 20,000x more biolife on earth in the past. It should be noted here he is not talking about giant Redwoods and the like, but a different kind of silicone tree.


Silicone Trees in the Petrified Forest National Park
Wood to gems? Ridiculous. Also cut with a chainsaw? By the natives? He then goes on to look at hexagonal mountains as silicon tree stumps, comparing the shape of the tendrils to that of many life-forms.  Actually these are branches of the giant silicone tree.




Devils Tower as an example. Columns - formed through cooling and solidification of magma?! Are you crazy? Far too geometrical! Why hexagons?



Do you see the tree stump?! No? How about now:



Snowflakes, beecombs, Plant Cells, and other life forms show this shape, not cooling magma?! Intrinsic to the recursive or fractal nature of reality.




NOTE:
  • Fibers do not go into ground vertically, but instead follow gradually into the ground like roots.
  • Fibrous Covering and Skin on Devils Tower

Using scale to an average tree, you come at a devils tower tree of 6km. Organic bodies Never turn to rubble or stone, just dig up your dead cat. Do you honestly expect him to be made of stone now? No, he's rotted dummy.


The Flood and World Tree Myth

This points to a great fire that caused the great flood. From there, we see the validity of the myth of a world tree - found across a great many cultures as spatially diverse as the American natives and the Celtic people. We were farmed for our silicon trees sometime in the past, and eventually the wastes were burned. A few survived and made them into myth, and into pretty national parks like pictured above. Some were cut down early in humanities stay here. What we are seeing in these giants, dinosaurs, and trees are the remains of a farming operation.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2016, 04:15:49 AM by John Davis »
"You are a very reasonable man John." - D1

"The lunatic, the lover, and the poet. Are of imagination all compact" - The Bard

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #199 on: August 15, 2016, 05:45:13 AM »
Maybe the giants who built this causeway:



Chopped down the 6km trees with massive axes?
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17873
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #200 on: August 15, 2016, 06:02:49 AM »
That is mentioned as well. He brings up a plethora of these hexagonal stone structures. Perhaps he have been damned by giants, sound asleep. Their axes likely weren't as crude as ours, and I doubt they stayed here long.

It certainly wouldn't be an impossible task for man or giant to cut down trees a great order of magnitude larger than themselves.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2016, 06:05:11 AM by John Davis »
"You are a very reasonable man John." - D1

"The lunatic, the lover, and the poet. Are of imagination all compact" - The Bard

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #201 on: August 15, 2016, 10:16:48 AM »
If dinosaurs were constructed using humanoid giant bones, why do they look like reptilian bones??

Long necked dinosaurs like Deinonychus would have needed 6 hearts for blood to reach their brain. Luckily they are cold-blooded and have no need for a heart that size.

If giant skeletons were actually real, why aren't they in museums instead of dinosaurs? I would pay just as much to see a giant skeleton. What reason do people have for creating a nonexistent class of creatures?

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #202 on: August 15, 2016, 10:24:34 AM »
Lol silicone.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #203 on: August 15, 2016, 02:38:09 PM »
I would think you would like paleontology, it is the study of digging up long dead things.

Like this thread.

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #204 on: August 15, 2016, 03:00:37 PM »
Get this shit off of FES.

Says it all ☺

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #205 on: August 16, 2016, 01:33:18 AM »
I might as well ask you why we should find a missing link? IF the timeline is 4,400 years we should be finding complete bodies all over the place.

We've really only stracthed the surface (literally) when it comes to digging. Most of the digging now is done by machines and hardly anyone watches what comes out.
Quote
Isn't it odd that some of the first dinosaurs we found were supposedly complete, except for their head?! And then their heads were faked to look like Iguanas? I suppose it wouldn't have been as suited for display in their houses.

How do you know they faked the head?

Quote
Why would we find random parts to dinosaurs and not their whole body. If one part ages, every part ages. Sure some parts might decompose faster, but then it would be uniform across the species - we'd have no legs for any dinosaurs of type x, for example.

You're assuming that we don't find the heads, if the dinosaurs died from a massive violent flood then you wouldn't have perfectly preserved bodies. All of the fossils are found in sedimentary rock indicating flooding.

We know the head is faked because they found out it was faked later. I'll find the source when I get a bit of extra time.


This is your logic: Some  paintings attributed to Van Gogh are actually fakes, and have been proved to be so beyond a shadow of doubt. Therefore, ALL Van Gogh paintings are fake, Van Gogh didn't exist, and all his output was created in Taiwan in 1978 by forgers.

I think you summed the entire thread PERFECTLY!

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17873
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #206 on: August 16, 2016, 02:56:33 AM »
Its more like "I have all these paintings from an undiscovered Renn. artist. Check them out, they are worth MILLIONS!"

Of course, those not being silly about the matter will have to respond with a bucket of questions such as "Why haven't we heard of this artist before?" and "How did you come into possession of these?" When you ask these sorts of questions regarding Dinosaur bones you start to find that Paleontologists are a of hacks and fakes with a long history of dishonesty, bad behavior, lying, and fraud.
"You are a very reasonable man John." - D1

"The lunatic, the lover, and the poet. Are of imagination all compact" - The Bard

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #207 on: August 16, 2016, 03:34:23 AM »
That is mentioned as well. He brings up a plethora of these hexagonal stone structures. Perhaps he have been damned by giants, sound asleep. Their axes likely weren't as crude as ours, and I doubt they stayed here long.
What kind of axes do you reckon they chopped down the 6km trees with?  Did they have anything like a giant chainsaw?  Imagine the size of that fucker!  Brrm...brrrm..brrrm!

Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17873
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #208 on: August 16, 2016, 07:19:38 AM »
Space axes. We are talking about somebody visiting our planet and performing widescale mining operations. We must assume they are sufficiently advanced...

At least that's one theory I've heard. Its not unimaginable for someone to chop down a tree order of magnitudes larger than what they normally would, however in this case the evidence points towards something much more sinister.



Be careful your eyes don't trick you - these aren't giants aside 6km trees, but simply normal sized men aside redwoods.

Likely the silicon was being harvested for either a silicon based life-form or for the technology necessary to 'refuel' or 'repair' a long trip vessel.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2016, 07:22:39 AM by John Davis »
"You are a very reasonable man John." - D1

"The lunatic, the lover, and the poet. Are of imagination all compact" - The Bard

Re: Dinosaurs: Made In China
« Reply #209 on: August 16, 2016, 08:42:47 AM »
Space axes. We are talking about somebody visiting our planet and performing widescale mining operations. We must assume they are sufficiently advanced...
Of course, and space axes are the very pinnacle of space faring technological achievement.

Quote
Likely the silicon was being harvested for either a silicon based life-form or for the technology necessary to 'refuel' or 'repair' a long trip vessel.
Yes, this does seem likely.  I can't imagine where else in the galaxy you'd find silicate, apart from 6km tall trees on Earth.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.