I'm not going to name names. I'm sure they wouldn't appreciate that. You can believe what you want. The fact is you can't find disagreement with what I'm saying and what relativity says. If you could, you'd simply provide it.
You have clearly gone into this far more than I have, but if you're "not going to name names" I am not going to consider it worthy of note. Your experts could include Miles Mathis (
π = 4 for dynamic situations) and his ilk!
Things in true inertial states follow Newton's laws. Given Newton's laws, and the Equivalence Principle, this means they are travelling in straight lines at constant speeds or are still. A subset of satellites are in inertial states. .: They are travelling in straight lines or are still.
Their space can be mapped broadly by the combination of their paths. Since each path is straight, the bounding surface is also straight. In three-dimensions we call 'straightness' flatness.
"They are travelling in straight lines" in 4-dimensional Space-Time. All I have seen is that away from extremely massive objects 3-D space is close enough to being flat.
That said, we digress a bit.
As far as Einstein's dishonesty and lack of care for empiricism, it is well known. Michael Brooks also writes about it in Free Radicals on page 56-62.
One of the cited instances was where his experiment to find the gyromagnetic ratio was blatantly faked. His theory showed 1.02. They did the experiment twice. The first time it came up 1.45. The second 1.02. They chose only to publish the value that matched his theory. Over the next 6 years of testing it was shown that the value was actually 2. He was also known for ignoring mistakes he found in others data if it supported his views, Brooks mentions Eddington. Of course, Free Radicals is pretty bubble-gummy. There are lots of quotes from Einstein as well around the effect. It was clear he felt his theory too beautiful to be wrong. He'd often sneer at QED because it went against common sense and his particular philosophical stint despite its experimental success. 'God does not play dice?'
Yes, Einstein was not always right, though he did say that the
1.02 had to be accidental as it was too close to his (erroneous) 1.0, and was human after all.
But then we are so perfect that we can judge!
And there is question over "Who discovered that
E = mc2?", but from what I can see there were
E = (3/4)mc2 and
E = (3/8)mc2 before Einstein, but not
E = mc2.
But claiming "He'd
often sneer at QED because it went against common sense and his particular philosophical stint despite its experimental success. 'God does not play dice?'" is very ingenuous! Yes, in 1915 he made the statement 'God does not play dice?', but you could hardly call the "Quantum Theory" of 1915, Quantum Electrodynamics!
One of Einstein's most famous quotes is often completely misinterpreted
After all, Einstein won a Nobel Prize in 1921 for describing the photoelectric effect — a phenomenon that led to the development of quantum mechanics.
The reason for the quote is to express how bizarre quantum mechanics is as a theory.
from
God Does not Play Dice Quote Meaning.
and quantum mechanics is
bizarre.
But if you are planning on correcting Newton and Einstein, you first have to pull them down.
Just think, when the name
John Davis is up there in lights, I will be able to claim that I opposed his ideas!
Back to the matter at hand, its ridiculous to think dinosaurs existed. Giants on the other hand, we actually have hard evidence for their existence. If there were so many dinosaurs, where is all the oil? It was a big deal for the nations to agree on a set price for oil, despite its supposed natural abundance. Oh that's right. They say its all in Antarctica. Only Big Science is allowed to go there.
I am no expert on dinosaurs, but do not doubt that there have been many fossils found. I have seen some, in the ground and "reconstructed", but while I am prepared to be skeptical I must accept that very many fossils are real. I also don't doubt that Chine makes replicas.
As for oil, "where is all the oil?" - almost everywhere if seems, but
I did not think dinosaurs came into it! I thought it was largely plant matter.
The Mysterious Origin and Supply of Oil
A so-called fossil fuel, petroleum is believed by most scientists to be the transformed remains of long dead organisms. The majority of petroleum is thought to come from the fossils of plants and tiny marine organisms. Larger animals might contribute to the mix as well.
See more at:
The Mysterious Origin and Supply of OilStill anyone can hold any opinion they like!