Dinosaurs: Made In China

Any lunar creatures, if they would exist would need a food source. It stands to reason that they would eat the food source available to them - themselves.

The lunar atmosphere consists of Argon, Helium, Neon, Sodium, Potassium, and Hydrogen.

The vast majority of dragons in mythology are snake based. It was not until the Christians started throwing body parts on them to symbolize the triumph over the pagan world that we saw most of the dragons that actually look somewhat similar to dinosaurs. Most shouldn't rightfully be called dragons, except due to romanization.

Viet. dragon is a snake and Phillipines' dragons are sea serpents. Chinese dragons are snakes with animal parts stitched on - four legs and the parts of other animals such as stag horns or fish fins - another Chinese piltdown. Indian dragons, Indonesian and Hindu (the naga) are also snake based, sometimes with many heads. Buddhism also has several sea serpent or river serpent dragons.

The myth of a dragon over the cultures are clearly about giant snakes and sea serpents. I call dinosaurs dragons to point out how ridiculous the belief in dinosaurs really is. IN reality, I'm far more inclined to believe in giant snakes, of which we at least have evidence for, than lumbering impossibly large dinosaurs.

Yes the Antarctic is rich with oil, and other resources.

Quote from: John Davis on January 17, 2018, 07:40:56 AM

Any lunar creatures, if they would exist would need a food source. It stands to reason that they would eat the food source available to them - themselves.

The lunar atmosphere consists of Argon, Helium, Neon, Sodium, Potassium, and Hydrogen.

The vast majority of dragons in mythology are snake based. It was not until the Christians started throwing body parts on them to symbolize the triumph over the pagan world that we saw most of the dragons that actually look somewhat similar to dinosaurs. Most shouldn't rightfully be called dragons, except due to romanization.

Viet. dragon is a snake and Phillipines' dragons are sea serpents. Chinese dragons are snakes with animal parts stitched on - four legs and the parts of other animals such as stag horns or fish fins - another Chinese piltdown. Indian dragons, Indonesian and Hindu (the naga) are also snake based, sometimes with many heads. Buddhism also has several sea serpent or river serpent dragons.

The myth of a dragon over the cultures are clearly about giant snakes and sea serpents. I call dinosaurs dragons to point out how ridiculous the belief in dinosaurs really is. IN reality, I'm far more inclined to believe in giant snakes, of which we at least have evidence for, than lumbering impossibly large dinosaurs.

Yes the Antarctic is rich with oil, and other resources.

No, you cannot have species survive only eating its own kind.  That's stupid on the face of it.

And as for dinosaurs, there are mountains of evidence to support the fact of their existence.  So far your evidence seems to be, some are fake, this guy did a study about the feeding habits of one species of whale, and another claims Saturn hovered over the North Pole.

Does that about sum it up?
You really need to step up your troll game.

Quote from: Badxtoss on January 17, 2018, 10:21:29 AM

Quote from: John Davis on January 17, 2018, 07:40:56 AM

Any lunar creatures, if they would exist would need a food source. It stands to reason that they would eat the food source available to them - themselves.

The lunar atmosphere consists of Argon, Helium, Neon, Sodium, Potassium, and Hydrogen.

The vast majority of dragons in mythology are snake based. It was not until the Christians started throwing body parts on them to symbolize the triumph over the pagan world that we saw most of the dragons that actually look somewhat similar to dinosaurs. Most shouldn't rightfully be called dragons, except due to romanization.

Viet. dragon is a snake and Phillipines' dragons are sea serpents. Chinese dragons are snakes with animal parts stitched on - four legs and the parts of other animals such as stag horns or fish fins - another Chinese piltdown. Indian dragons, Indonesian and Hindu (the naga) are also snake based, sometimes with many heads. Buddhism also has several sea serpent or river serpent dragons.

The myth of a dragon over the cultures are clearly about giant snakes and sea serpents. I call dinosaurs dragons to point out how ridiculous the belief in dinosaurs really is. IN reality, I'm far more inclined to believe in giant snakes, of which we at least have evidence for, than lumbering impossibly large dinosaurs.

Yes the Antarctic is rich with oil, and other resources.

No, you cannot have species survive only eating its own kind.  That's stupid on the face of it.

Which is why they also eat the atmosphere, as stated previously.

Quote

And as for dinosaurs, there are mountains of evidence to support the fact of their existence.  So far your evidence seems to be, some are fake, this guy did a study about the feeding habits of one species of whale, and another claims Saturn hovered over the North Pole.

Incorrect.

Quote

Does that about sum it up?
You really need to step up your troll game.

No, and I'm not trolling. I suggest you review the thread. I never fail to be surprised at the stupidity of those that come to a society of free thinkers and then are all like "You can't possibly believe this you are trolling!" Not only am I not the only flat earther to not buy into the dinofaux myth, I am also not the only free thinker.

You clearly haven't read the research on our luna friends on the moon, or penguins. There is no doubt in the scientific community as to their existence. I see no need to discuss serious research with somebody who thinks I am trolling them. Good day.

You clearly haven't read the research on our luna friends on the moon, or penguins. There is no doubt in the scientific community as to their existence. I see no need to discuss serious research with somebody who thinks I am trolling them. Good day.

You clearly haven't read the research on our luna friends on the moon, or penguins. There is no doubt in the scientific community as to their existence. I see no need to discuss serious research with somebody who thinks I am trolling them. Good day.

Quote from: John Davis on January 17, 2018, 10:51:43 AM

You clearly haven't read the research on our luna friends on the moon, or penguins. There is no doubt in the scientific community as to their existence. I see no need to discuss serious research with somebody who thinks I am trolling them. Good day.

There you go making stuff up again, mythical moonshrimp consuming mythical atmospheric gasses. You said the moon’s atmosphere is composed of the followings day I quote:

“The lunar atmosphere consists of Argon, Helium, Neon, Sodium, Potassium, and Hydrogen”
John Davis

A couple of slight problems potassium boils at over 700 Celsius
Sodium boils at just under 900 Celsius
Argon is almost totally unreactive and has no known biological role
Like argon neon is unreactive and forms no biological molecules
Hydrogen being so light would float off into space as would helium.

For the self proclaimed world’s foremost zetetic scientist, your not doing very well.
By the way when are you going to publish or share your evidence?

Quote from: Nightsky on January 17, 2018, 11:40:46 AM

Quote from: John Davis on January 17, 2018, 10:51:43 AM

You clearly haven't read the research on our luna friends on the moon, or penguins. There is no doubt in the scientific community as to their existence. I see no need to discuss serious research with somebody who thinks I am trolling them. Good day.

There you go making stuff up again, mythical moonshrimp consuming mythical atmospheric gasses. You said the moon’s atmosphere is composed of the followings day I quote:

“The lunar atmosphere consists of Argon, Helium, Neon, Sodium, Potassium, and Hydrogen”
John Davis

A couple of slight problems potassium boils at over 700 Celsius
Sodium boils at just under 900 Celsius
Argon is almost totally unreactive and has no known biological role
Like argon neon is unreactive and forms no biological molecules
Hydrogen being so light would float off into space as would helium.

For the self proclaimed world’s foremost zetetic scientist, your not doing very well.
By the way when are you going to publish or share your evidence?

But he already said there is no doubt among the scientific community.  So why does he need to publish anything?

Quote from: Badxtoss on January 17, 2018, 11:53:44 AM

Quote from: Nightsky on January 17, 2018, 11:40:46 AM

Quote from: John Davis on January 17, 2018, 10:51:43 AM

You clearly haven't read the research on our luna friends on the moon, or penguins. There is no doubt in the scientific community as to their existence. I see no need to discuss serious research with somebody who thinks I am trolling them. Good day.

There you go making stuff up again, mythical moonshrimp consuming mythical atmospheric gasses. You said the moon’s atmosphere is composed of the followings day I quote:

“The lunar atmosphere consists of Argon, Helium, Neon, Sodium, Potassium, and Hydrogen”
John Davis

A couple of slight problems potassium boils at over 700 Celsius
Sodium boils at just under 900 Celsius
Argon is almost totally unreactive and has no known biological role
Like argon neon is unreactive and forms no biological molecules
Hydrogen being so light would float off into space as would helium.

For the self proclaimed world’s foremost zetetic scientist, your not doing very well.
By the way when are you going to publish or share your evidence?

But he already said there is no doubt among the scientific community.  So why does he need to publish anything?

What?  No way.  He is the most influential thinker of our time.  Just ask him.

Ah....youhave to remember....a John said, has to be taken with a couple buckets of NaCl.

I've explained this multiple times. Due to the evidence I presented. Dinosaurs are an untenable hypothesis and can't maintain their own weight and go against everything we already know about biology. Large beasts, such as mammoths and giants, do not and have been reported as observed since the dawn of recorded history. Dinosaurs have shown up in the last 150 years near the advent of science as profession and presumably the gullibility of the American public.

It does appear that the word of the scientific community is never doubted by true believers of their craft. 

Things that happen in real life are not always correctly stated in those wizardly manuals you all swear allegiance to.

I believe Mr Davis' motivation for spewing nonsense are greed, and vanity.

There you go making stuff up again, mythical moonshrimp consuming mythical atmospheric gasses. You said the moon’s atmosphere is composed of the followings day I quote:

“The lunar atmosphere consists of Argon, Helium, Neon, Sodium, Potassium, and Hydrogen”
John Davis

A couple of slight problems potassium boils at over 700 Celsius
Sodium boils at just under 900 Celsius
Argon is almost totally unreactive and has no known biological role
Like argon neon is unreactive and forms no biological molecules
Hydrogen being so light would float off into space as would helium.

For the self proclaimed world’s foremost zetetic scientist, your not doing very well.
By the way when are you going to publish or share your evidence?

Not only did I not discover luna (what you call moonshrimp for some reason),

Quote from: John Davis on January 17, 2018, 01:08:48 PM

Not only did I not discover luna (what you call moonshrimp for some reason),

We called them moonshramp because if you remember, there was a democratic vote on the forum as to what to call them, and moonshramp got the most votes.
And no, of course you didn't discover them, because you can only discover something that exist.

(from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_the_Moon)

"The average daytime abundances of the elements known to be present in the lunar atmosphere, in atoms per cubic centimeter, are as follows:

Argon: 20,000–100,000
Helium: 5,000–30,000
Neon: up to 20,000
Sodium: 70
Potassium: 17
Hydrogen: fewer than 17

This yields approximately 80,000 total atoms per cubic centimeter, marginally higher than the quantity posited to exist in the atmosphere of Mercury.
While this greatly exceeds the density of the solar wind, which is usually on the order of just a few protons per cubic centimeter,
it is virtually a vacuum in comparison with the atmosphere of the Earth.
The Moon may also have a tenuous "atmosphere" of electrostatically-levitated dust."

----------------------------------------------------------------

Do metals sublimate?
Yes, they do, which is more significant in vacuum:

"The sublimation rate will depend on temperature and energy of sublimation, which is different for different metals.
Also in normal conditions you will have some kind of equilibrium - some of the particles that leave the surface will
condensate back. But in vacuum techniques you need to take this to account - there are metals with low sublimation
energy - such as Zinc, Magnesium, Cadmium e.t.c."

I am somewhat confused. Who has said all oil is in Antarctica?

Quote from: Dinosaur Neil on January 17, 2018, 01:12:25 PM

Quote from: John Davis on January 17, 2018, 01:08:48 PM

Not only did I not discover luna (what you call moonshrimp for some reason),

We called them moonshramp because if you remember, there was a democratic vote on the forum as to what to call them, and moonshramp got the most votes.
And no, of course you didn't discover them, because you can only discover something that exist.

Unfortunately for your will to be a constant idiot wind, it was James that first discovered them and Dr. Ichi backed it up with further studies.

You called them shramp far before any democratic vote, not that such a vote would matter. Its a purposeful attempt to take a serious research subject and paint it as ridiculous, much like what the creationists did with the "Big Bang".

Quote from: Macarios on January 17, 2018, 01:17:17 PM

(from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_the_Moon)

"The average daytime abundances of the elements known to be present in the lunar atmosphere, in atoms per cubic centimeter, are as follows:

Argon: 20,000–100,000
Helium: 5,000–30,000
Neon: up to 20,000
Sodium: 70
Potassium: 17
Hydrogen: fewer than 17

This yields approximately 80,000 total atoms per cubic centimeter, marginally higher than the quantity posited to exist in the atmosphere of Mercury.
While this greatly exceeds the density of the solar wind, which is usually on the order of just a few protons per cubic centimeter,
it is virtually a vacuum in comparison with the atmosphere of the Earth.
The Moon may also have a tenuous "atmosphere" of electrostatically-levitated dust."

----------------------------------------------------------------

Do metals sublimate?
Yes, they do, which is more significant in vacuum:

"The sublimation rate will depend on temperature and energy of sublimation, which is different for different metals.
Also in normal conditions you will have some kind of equilibrium - some of the particles that leave the surface will
condensate back. But in vacuum techniques you need to take this to account - there are metals with low sublimation
energy - such as Zinc, Magnesium, Cadmium e.t.c."

Thank you for confirming this for Nightsky. He has a hard time with things.

I, like James, am on a first name basis with everybody in the scientific community.

I did, I am not. The Scientific Community is a bunch of bunk and old house wives tales. I prefer the scientific community.

I answered them. I know they were accepted by the scientific community, because I am on a first name basis with the scientific community.

Has Mr Davis always been this witty and playful, or has it become worse as of late?

Any man, or able bodied woman, can view the flat earth for him or herself with ease using this simple experiment (and many others!)

Should they find themselves at a dock, they need only slip the foreman a 20 dollar bill to view the inside of a shipping crate. Be careful, and tread lightly as you likely won't be accustomed to the 'shipyard banter' that often fills these locations. Now, at sunrise, within your shipping crate that is facing sunrise, with one end unbarred, take note of how the light illuminates the crate during the sunrise. If, as we are told, the earth is round then we would expect the top of the crate to be illuminated first - as it should have a better vantage point for the sun as it rises above a horizon.

You might well save your time though, as any dockworker will testify - the crate is not lit in this manner at all. This is yet another proof that the earth is not a spinning round ball hurtling through space at ridiculous speeds in some sort of celestial race, but instead a plane as our senses and logic dictates it must be.

It serves as yet another reason any thinking sailor since the dawn of time has known - the Earth is Flat.

Appeal to Ridicule
reductio ad ridiculum
(also known as: appeal to mockery, the horse laugh)

Description: Presenting the argument in such a way that makes the argument look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument or the use of exaggeration.

From: Logical Fallacies, Appeal to Ridicule