I am from Iraq, and I can watch CNN how is it possible if there is no any satellites around earth or above us that transports the signals from the TV from USA to my country. I am saying that because the people who believe in flat earth say that there is no Satellites.
What you say is untrue. What is true is that some Flat Earth Theorists deny the existence of satellites, but not all do. For example, I can demonstrate that satellites are compatible with the Flat Earth Theory. My suggestion is you do a bit more reading prior to making blanket statements.
I'm under the impression you are a flat earth believer and would you please explain how an artificial satellite can orbit a flat earth. I have researched this and I don't understand how it would work in your model like we are told satellites orbit the earth.
The Terrestial Plane is bounded non Euclidian Space, this explaining why that if we are at point XY and travel in the direction X for sufficient time and speed we end up back at XY.
The Celestial Sphere is Euclidian Space which is above the Terrestrial Plane. The aether at the Sea Level on the Terrestrial Plane is of very low density but increase geometrically with altitude above this Plane.
When an object is delivered at sufficient altitude into the aether, where sufficient density exists, the aether holds the object in place much like a buoy in the water. In addition at sufficient altitudes above the Terresrrial Plane the aether rotates (this is what moves, or effects the movement of, the Celestial Bodies.
Thus an object delivered at sufficient altitude is both suspended by the aether and moved by it . Those delivered at lower altitudes are buoyed by it, but at low enough altitudes are below the aetheric whirpool and are stationary.
Thus we both have stationary and moving satellites. Also note that the "apparently strange" orbits observed on the Terrestrial Plane of these moving satellites are a result of observing from a non Euclidian space the movement of objects in Euclidian space.