What if there is no "edge"? Just because the land we know of is surrounded by a ring of ice doesn't mean beyond that there couldn't be endless continent's and oceans going on infinitely...
Interesting thought. Let me just go check out some imagery from some polar satellites, and---
Huh. It looks like Antarctica is just a very cold continent.
You go ahead and keep looking at the images they feed you...good Goy
Nobody "feeds" me anything. You call yourself "freethinker," but the fact that you believe the shit on here instead of looking for yourself suggests otherwise. I know for a fact that satellites are crossing the poles all the time. Do you seriously think there could be a cannon set up at the edge to constantly fire new polar satellites and replace the ones that fly off the edge?
No, I never heard anything about cannons. I apologize for being a bit judgemental. I have been doing my own research and I gave good rain to believe the earth could be flat according to what I know and what I've seen with my own eyes. Yes, we see lights in the nights sky that seem to be satellites, but since I have never actually seen one, nor have I seen one being launched and had the ability to discern for myself that the images coming from it were not designed by a computer program using cgi, I refuse to accept that they are what they say they are. This really comes down to whether or not you believe in "them" and the agenda or not.
Well, I was present for the launch of STS-125, so I can personally attest to the reality of rocket launches. Speaking of STS-125, that was one of the very few times that two shuttles were on the launch pads at once, the reason being that, since the shuttle was visiting Hubble instead of the ISS, the crew had nowhere to go if unreasonable damage was found on the heat shield.
Now, for a space agency that supposedly never sends anything real to space, that's a lot of care and concern shown for the crew's safety. They've learned a lot since the Challenger and Columbia disasters.
Speaking of the Columbia disaster, how could the crew have been killed in a fiery meteor visible from earth as they returned home from space, if they never went to space in the first place? How could people die in a space program that never gets off the ground? I've heard "theories" in the past that the Apollo 1 tragedy was part of a coup to eliminate disgruntled crew members who were becoming a threat. Let's take a moment to consider how preposterous that would be. Each of the accidents have caused NASA years worth of investigation, auditing, and reparation, and significantly damaged their public image. Why would they intentionally do such a thing, when there are much more subtle ways of eliminating threats? No, the only reasonable explanation is that they died in a legitimate accident.
I could go on, but are you starting to see that NASA really is doing what it says it is? Its agenda is exploration, discovery, and safety, and it has neither the means nor the motive to focus on anything more nefarious than that.