England did NOT win the 1966 World Cup - PROOF.

History would have you believe that on July 30, 1966, England beat West Germany 4-2 after extra time to win the World Cup. I have been analysing the evidence for this so-called historic event and believe there are serious inconsistencies in the record which lead me to the only possible conclusion: not only did England did NOT win the World Cup, but there wasn't even a World Cup in that year.

The evidence, o dear and most gentle of readers, speaks for itself.

A. Photographic evidence.

B. Jules Rimet trophy stolen - found by dog called Pickles.

C. Destruction of evidence.

D. Documentary evidence

In forthcoming posts, we'll look at the evidence together, and come to the inevitable and shocking conclusion that it was all a complete SHAMFEST.

The "Theft" of the Jules Rimet Trophy



Just a few weeks before the World Cup, 1966, the Jules Rimet Trophy was allegedly stolen from a guarded exhibition

This story has more holes than a Lithuanian prostitute's fishnets. It screams "false flag operation". Let's examine the evidence.

1. The Jules Rimet trophy, made out of solid gold and then worth £30,000, was stolen from an exhibition from Central Hall in Westminster, London - right from under the noses two security guards who were being paid to guard it!

2. While the trophy was stolen, thieves inexplicably decided to leave behind a stamp collection worth £3,000,000. Simple maths proves that the stamps were worth 100x more than the trophy. Why take the instantly recognisable trophy worth just 1% that of a stamp collection that would have been far easier to break up and sell on? What would you do?

Look at this picture. It shows two people with $1,000,000, and very happy they look too. Imagine having THREE TIMES that amount. Now imagine that in a real currency, Pounds Sterling, rather than US dollars. Now imagine what that is worth in today's terms. Would you be happy stealing a poxy £30,000 trophy that you'd have to go to the trouble of melting down when you could have a cool £3,000,000 instead, in handy, manageable stamps? No, neither would I.



3. Though the FA had allegedly received demands for money for the safe return of the trophy, it was found a week later by a dog called Pickles, hidden under a bush in Beulah Hill, South London. Does anyone of sound mind really believe that an enterprising thief would risk being spotted or arrested by two security guards when stealing the trophy, make demands for cash to the FA for a week, then simply leave £30,000 of solid gold underneath a bush for some hapless dog to sniff out? This story beggars belief, and quite frankly I'm not buying it. Neither should you, gentle reader.

This story smells worse than a lift full of Plutarkian lawyers, stuck between floors on a holiday weekend.

Here's what actually happened. The FA faked the theft of the trophy in order to raise interest in a competition that had failed to capture the imagination of the English public (ticket sales were negligible prior to the theft). They also wanted to instill a sense of national indignation and pride in the trophy. This would engender feelings of ownership among England fans. They would consider the trophy theirs before they even kicked a ball in anger. It was all part of pre-conditioning to make the gullible English think they already owned the trophy.

What does the innocent little dog Pickles think of this whole sordid affair? TOTALLY BORED!!! If he really had found the Jules Rimet Trophy, surely he would have been very excited? Engaged in ostentatious displays of tail-wagging? Licked the odd passer-by and begged for the occasional doggy treat?

Even the damned DOG is whistleblowing!!!



http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/20/newsid_2861000/2861545.stm

Incidentally, the Jules Rimet trophy WAS stolen in 1983, from the headquarters of the Brazilian Football Confederation. Are we really to believe that Brazilians are better trophy thieves than the English?

Oh, there's more. What do we get when we anagrammize "Jules Rimet Trophy"?

"Their Polymer Just". Which equates to "Their plastic truth". How very apt!

Or try this one for size.

"Ripe Motherly Juts". I don't know what that means, but I think it's important.

Well, I'm convinced.

What does the innocent little dog Pickles think of this whole sordid affair?

Nothing innocent about Pickles.  He was a CIA plant working for Lyndon B. Johnson to cover up his assassination of JFK.

Quote

What does the innocent little dog Pickles think of this whole sordid affair?

Nothing innocent about Pickles.  He was a CIA plant working for Lyndon B. Johnson to cover up his assassination of JFK.

You may well be on to something there. I'll do some more digging and get back to you.

In the meantime, more evidence that the final itself was a complete and utter FAKE.

Me and my mate Bob from down the pub stayed up well past our bedtime examining the photographic record (I'm allowed from the psych ward out on weekend visits). Aided by several pots of strong, black coffee  with a dash of Irish (and a toke you could rake a garden with), we were able to determine beyond any doubt that the photographic record of the 1966 World Cup, was indeed fabricated.

Check some of these bad boys out.

This photo was supposedly taken when Geoff Hurst scored England's controversial 3rd goal. It is riddled with anomalies!!! So many that I've had to analyse 2
different photos from a similar angle just to be able to highlight a small number of the many inconsistencies in this photo. Clearly, this is a deliberate act of
whistle-blowing by someone in the English FA's propaganda department.



Look at this! Would you really have thought that the golden boy of English football, Bobby Charlton, would really have a wooden leg and run like a girl?



Now this one really takes the biscuit. I've heard of referees being described as fat-heads before (at least, I think it's fat-heads), but come on! It's the Michelin man for crying out loud!



Shadows pointing in different directions, anyone? More fake than the ruddy moon-landings!



What on EARTH is the German goalkeeper doing here? Looking for his contact lenses? Too late sunshine, we've scored! Have a word. FAKE!!!

Love it.

Though watch out for Pickles - he's a stone cold killer.   You may well now be "suicided"...

I must protest at my thread being moved from the Flat Earth General board (which is for conspiracy topics), to the Technology, Science and Alternative Science board, to which it is completely unrelated.

Clearly I'm on to something and the PTB have got to the mods.

I must protest at my thread being moved from the Flat Earth General board (which is for conspiracy topics), to the Technology, Science and Alternative Science board, to which it is completely unrelated.

Clearly I'm on to something and the PTB have got to the mods.

It's for conspiracy topics about the flat-earth. Honestly, it doesn't fit that great here in TS&AS, but it's this or Complete Nonsense.

*I'm getting clarification. Stay tuned.

Quote from: PsychedelicPill on March 28, 2016, 06:54:28 AM

I must protest at my thread being moved from the Flat Earth General board (which is for conspiracy topics), to the Technology, Science and Alternative Science board, to which it is completely unrelated.

Clearly I'm on to something and the PTB have got to the mods.

It's for conspiracy topics about the flat-earth. Honestly, it doesn't fit that great here in TS&AS, but it's this or Complete Nonsense.

*I'm getting clarification. Stay tuned.

Oh, please send it to Complete Nonsense! Along with all the other extremely valid but non-flat earth theories such as the ISS being a Gulfstream jet, rockets being unable to work in a vacuum etc etc etc. This thread is going to have waaaay more evidence than those, seriously.

Quote from: PsychedelicPill on March 28, 2016, 06:54:28 AM

I must protest at my thread being moved from the Flat Earth General board (which is for conspiracy topics), to the Technology, Science and Alternative Science board, to which it is completely unrelated.

Clearly I'm on to something and the PTB have got to the mods.

It's for conspiracy topics about the flat-earth. Honestly, it doesn't fit that great here in TS&AS, but it's this or Complete Nonsense.

*I'm getting clarification. Stay tuned.

The description for Flat Earth general has been altered to clarify what fits there.

The Russian Linesman

Tofik Bakhramov is the Russian linesman who is supposed to have given England's controversial 3rd goal. (Fancy, having a Russian linesman in the final of the World Cup in 1966, just 21 years after England and Russia conspired to defeat Germany in the Second World War! ROFLMHAO!!!) So what does the mysterious Tofik have to say about the World Cup? Taken from his Wiki article:-

"duels...full of unforeseen turns and even real miracles. And who does not want to be a magician if even for just 90 minutes?"

This is a clear case of whistle-blowing – he admitting to being a magician, i.e. it was all a big illusion!

HES NOT EVEN RUSSIAN!!!! He’s from Azerbaijan! Why did the authorities say he was Russian? Further evidence of whistle-blowing.

The Azerbaijan national stadium is named the Tofik Bakhramov Stadium in his honour. When England were drawn in the same group as Azerbaijan in qualifying for the 2006 World Cup, a ceremony was held prior to the meeting at the Tofik Bakhramov Stadium to honour his memory, with attendees including Geoff Hurst, and FIFA president Sepp Blatter. A statue of him was also unveiled at the ceremony. NEED I SAY MORE!!!



Well, yes actually, I need say more. Anagrams. Why are anagrams important? They offer very reliable whistle-blowing clues. With anagrams, you can almost feel the hand of truth reaching out from behind the curtain of history, providing you're open-minded enough to want to know the truth, rather than the state-sponsored LIES we've been spoon-fed all these years.

An anagram of TOFIK BAKHRAMOV is....

"A FOB OHM VAT KIRK"

Now,
A      = A
FOB  = Fresh Off the Boat = Foreigner
OHM = Resistance Unit
VAT = Taxes
Kirk = Captain (off Star Trek which began broadcasting in... 1966!)

Put it all together, you get

"A FOB OHM VAT KIRK"

Or....

"A foreign resistance unit taxes the captain!!!!!"

Tofik Bakhramov = A foreign resistance unit taxes the captain!!!

Which is exactly what he did to the German captain in the 1966 World Cup - allegedly. The odds of this happening by chance are astronomical. It could not happen by chance. One word, people. WHISTLEBLOWING.

Well, I'm convinced.  I'm pretty sure athletics in general is a lie. 

Well, I'm convinced.  I'm pretty sure athletics in general is a lie.

Oh, there's more to come. Proof of destruction of evidence on a truly massive scale. Keep your eyes peeled this weekend.

DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE

According to the FA, 8 grounds were used to host the finals - 4 of which have been ERASED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH!!! What do the FA have to hide?

White City, London - DEMOLISHED 1985.

Did you know that the reason White City was allegedly used for a World Cup match, is that the owner's of Wembley REFUSED to cancel a greyhound meeting to allow Uruguay to play France in the 1966 World Cup? Does anyone of sound mind actually believe this drivel? Wembley Stadium, the pride of the nation, refused to allow two teams to play an important match in the World Cup, the first and only time the World Cup has been held in England, so that some dogs could run around chasing a pwetendy wabbit? The real reason is that NO SUCH FOOTBALL MATCH WAS SCHEDULED. It is all part of the great con-trick played on us by FIFA and the FA, in collusion with MI6 and the Royal Family (probably). White City was demolished to stop investigators using modern, forensic techniques to determine whether a game of football had been played there just 19 years previously. What did they build in it's place? BBC White City, a building that looks suspiciously like the new MI6 building.



Roker Park, Sunderland - DEMOLISHED 1997
Ayresome Park, Middlesbrough - DEMOLISHED 1997

TWO football stadia demolished in the same year? Coincidence?

The FA would also have you believe that the mighty North Korea actually beat Italy 1-0 at Ayresome Park during the World Cup groups stages. Who do they think they're kidding! They just made that scoreline up and hoped nobody would notice. Well, nobody did notice, and he's ME.

Wembley, London - DEMOLISHED 2003

So what about that jewel in the crown of not only English football, but world football - Wembley. Home to all those FA Cup finals (not to mention those important dog-races - ROFLMHAO!!!). Those famous twin towers. That hallowed turf. Surely this should be a national monument, a listed building to be treasured for generations to come? DEMOLISHED. If England really had won the World Cup at Wembley in 1966, there is NO WAY that ANY government would allow that building to be demolished. It would be akin to excising part of the "national psyche". Imagine Nelson's column being pulled down to make way for a bus terminal? Stonehenge being cleared for hotel/casino complex? Buckingham Palace turned into accomodation for asylum seekers (some would argue that's what it is, but therein lies a different tale). Of course not, the nation would not stand for it. Yet we sit idly by as this homage to English footballing history, the only place we have ever won ANYTHING (allegedly), is razed to the ground to be replaced by the world's largest arch? It didn't happen, good people. Time to wake up and smell the ersatz.



There has been a surreptitious plan to slowly eradicate evidence of the World Cup by destroying the stadia that allegedly hosted games. The reason, quite simply, is that there WEREN'T ANY GAMES.

Incidentally, the last game to be played at Wembley was England against Germany. England lost 1-0. Do you really think that a national side would have allowed themselves to be beaten, on home turf, in the very last game, against the rivals whom they allegedly beat in the World Cup final of 66, tarnishing forever that great achievement?

Of course you don't. Because it DIDN'T HAPPEN.

I love this thread. So much.

I love this thread. So much.

Then you, sir, are indeed a fellow seeker of truth, who refuses to blindly accept the false reality we've spoon-fed by historians for decades.

What happens if you Google 1966 nasa world cup?

http://newsthump.com/2010/06/21/nasa-faked-england-1996-world-cup-win/

I rest my case. Nearly.

Quote from: Symptom on April 18, 2016, 09:23:56 AM

I love this thread. So much.

Then you, sir, are indeed a fellow seeker of truth, who refuses to blindly accept the false reality we've spoon-fed by historians for decades.

What happens if you Google 1966 nasa world cup?

http://newsthump.com/2010/06/21/nasa-faked-england-1996-world-cup-win/

I rest my case. Nearly.

Irrefutable evidence.