Quantum Zeta Forward Level Flat Earth Science by FE Prof. Wise

  • 195 Replies
  • 46373 Views
*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
Gravity debunked by CERN professor!
« Reply #180 on: August 03, 2019, 12:00:47 AM »
Newton was wrong: Scientists dismiss Newton's theory of gravity and warn Einstein is next


NEWTON is rightly regarded as the greatest scientist of all time. However, groundbreaking black hole research has now disproved Newton’s theory of gravity – and even Albert Einstein’s theories are “starting to fray around the edges”, a scientist has warned.

Author: By TOM FISH
PUBLISHED: 06:01, Fri, Aug 2, 2019 | UPDATED: 06:39, Fri, Aug 2, 2019

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1158337/ewton-wrong-science-dismiss-isaac-newton-theory-gravity-albert-einstein-black-hole

More than 100 years after Albert Einstein published his iconic theory of general relativity, it is beginning to show signs of age. Now, following the most comprehensive test of general relativity yet near the monstrous black hole at the centre of our galaxy, University of California’s Professor Andrea Ghez has announced Einstein’s theory of general relativity still holds up – for now. Professor Ghez said: ”Einstein’s right, at least for now. We can absolutely rule out Newton’s law of gravity. “Our observations are consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity.

“However, his theory is definitely showing vulnerability.

Einstein's right, at least for now. We can absolutely rule out Newton's law of gravity

Professor Andrea Ghez

“It cannot fully explain gravity inside a black hole, and at some point we will need to move beyond Einstein’s theory to a more comprehensive theory of gravity that explains what a black hole is.”

German-born theoretical physicist Einstein is, alongside Max Planck, considered one of the two pillars of modern physics.

His 1915 theory of general relativity holds that what we perceive as the force of gravity arises from the curvature of space-time.



Isaac Newton: The latest black hole study has conclusively ruled out Newton's theory of gravity (Image: Nicolle R. Fuller/National Science Foundation)



Isaac Newton: Although regarded as a genius polymath, Newton's theory of gravity is outdated (Image: Getty)

Read more: https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1158337/ewton-wrong-science-dismiss-isaac-newton-theory-gravity-albert-einstein-black-hole

Turkish flat earther mentioned  this debunk: Doğukan Özkan: 
Another Turkish flat earther mentioned globalist terror in flat earth society (out of issue)



Rest in peace, newzelander.  :'(
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
Re: Quantum Zeta Forward Level Flat Earth Science by FE Prof. Wise
« Reply #181 on: August 21, 2019, 01:15:50 AM »
... Maybe not so...  :)
« Last Edit: August 21, 2019, 04:38:04 AM by wise »
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
To precipitate the capitalist system with one punch!
« Reply #182 on: August 26, 2019, 04:02:32 AM »
... You are not ready for this yet...
« Last Edit: August 26, 2019, 07:50:47 AM by wise »
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
To precipitate the capitalist system with one punch!
« Reply #183 on: August 28, 2019, 08:18:01 AM »
Since there is leaking in the forum, I've decided to explain this method, that I have gave up to explain it earlier. Israel central Bank has announced they have decided to improve their resources, it means to me they have leaked the method, hence I've announce the method for equalize the chances with others.

To precipitate the capitalist system with one punch!

capitalist system is based on money. this money must have an equivalent, otherwise it will cause inflation. inflation is getting happened by either system failure, corruption or indirect tax. therefore, inflation will not occur as long as the equivalent of the existing money is present in a system. This equivalent may be immovable or gold or other moneys.

in fact, the system can be made completely unusable, but for now I will only describe how this system can be easily exploited and  precipitated.

What was the amount of money in a system? the immovables and gold and other national currencies owned by the central bank.

1- Create a central bank in any country, which its currency accepted by other countries. Smallest countries is best. Because it is easy to buy them.

2- Take tax temporarily or print up enough money to cause 10% inflation. this inflation will not occur again.

3- Buy gold from the outside with your money.

4- Put this gold to central bank.

5- coin new money equal to amount of gold you have deposited to your central bank.

6- Buy new gold with the money you have printed yet. It has equalent in your system so that it does not cause the inflation.

7- You can buy houses in your own country and countries completely free by using same method. this is why capital wants free countries. because only then can they buy anything they want.

8- By repeating this method infinty you can buy the whole world.

I explained this method and now that there is no separation of weak country or strong country. all countries are equal as long as their currencies are accepted by others. all systems are based on trust.

we trusted the Americans. now they have to give each individual of our people $ 100,000 to get rid of this crisis. otherwise we will begin to implement this method. It will start to demolish the system. And the first countries will be down the countries which has benefited from it. I think USA is at the top of the list. Ahahaha.

People say how am I wise? Actually I am not wise but they are. So, tell me, did you ever think this? Did you aware of this problem in capitalist system? Hah. So please, respect the wisdom.
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
BUILDING TILL INFINITY - To precipitate the capitalist system 2
« Reply #184 on: August 29, 2019, 06:15:26 AM »
INFINITY CONSTRUCTION METHOD

In this method, you make a mortgage on one of the immovables registered in the system and put the mortgage in the safe as money equivalent. you produce as much money as the amount of the mortgage. that is, the equivalent of the money you produce is a money that is present in your safe as a building. with this money you buy, or produce, a new building. you buy or produce the building again mortgage and mortgage document you put in the bank vault. and with this method you can build buildings at any height you want anywhere in the world. countries such as Dubai, Qatar and Hong Kong did not magically prosper. these methods are especially applied in qatar and dubaide. they did not because they were oil-rich, but because they discovered the weaknesses of the system.

from this method you can understand that: Actually, construction of buildings are free. When you build a building, you save it to the treasure. it remains on the treasury's immovable list as long as it is purchased by someone registered in your country, and therefore has the right to generate money equivalent to that building. in other words, the moment a contractor builds a building, he can get the money from the treasury exactly as much as the price of the building.

When banks provide loans, they mortgage the building. and the total value of the building from the central bank. because the central bank receives the right to print money as much as the building registered in the system. On the one hand, the bank receives the building money from the central bank for mortgage and on the other hand receives money from the customer. When the mortgage expires, the money has been used sufficiently and the building has begun to age, which will reduce the value of the building.

therefore, as long as the value of the mortgage in the central bank decreases, it receives it back from the bank. and during this time the customer continues to pay his money. When the customer finishes paying his money to the bank, the bank completes his payment to the central bank. the only bank making a profit here is the central bank. as long as the building is not sold to foreigners, or within the country, it earns as much as its current value.

This is the logic of the mortgage system. The only winner of the mortgage system is the central bank.

a real government does not receive interest from home citizens for a home loan, nor does it even take back the entire loan. half or less of it is enough.

for example;

A newly built house, worth $ 1,000,000. You used a $ 1,000,000 loan from the bank and your home was mortgaged. The bank receives the money from central bank you will pay to the seller from in return for the mortgage made and pays to the seller. the money spent by the bank is zero. It has took the money from central bank and payed the seller. The central bank produces and puts on the market $ 1,000,000 for the $ 1,000,000 mortgage that the bank has given to itself, and this is the money it gives to the bank. Central bank has no loss or earnings from this business. It took a paper has 1.000.000$ and created and payed the bank same cash.

you are the only person who is in loss from the moment you start paying the bank. in other words, even if you do not pay the bank at all, neither the bank from which you borrowed nor the central bank will suffer any damage.

Hence, you do not have to pay anything to bank at all infact.

I think everyone understood the issue. Short link to original here:
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
NNWO SUBLIMINAL WARNING TO ME AND MY RESPONSE BY USING HERE
« Reply #185 on: September 02, 2019, 04:31:31 AM »
Just two posts above you can see, and then they have sent me a message.

I was at Bursa at weekend.

It was like this:

HELLO STRANGER

The text I saw on cinemaximum's wall. the letter "o" in the first word and the letter "st" in the second word are written in different colors. When you remove these letters "hell 'ranger" expression appears. in other words, "hell's ranger". So, is cinemaximum hell's ranger?

[Hello stranger with hell's ranger means: "Hell's ranges wellcomes you"]This is for foreigners.

I guess the NNWO gives a subliminal message with this, they have created the heaven and hell scenario, kerberos and other angels. Because Malls are their center hearthquartes of trade.

Maybe they just wanted to scare me. maybe they're sending a warning message. We had to meet in a way. Am I not the Messiah? I don't think so. But If they target me, I have to defend me to save people. If they don't target me, I'm gonna have to save people again. I think the good front and the bad front have emerged spontaneously.

I am not stranger. I just seem stranger to them. I'm undoubtedly older than them.

Wouldn't it be better for everyone if they gave me the "$ 100 million" I needed for my project instead of calling me "stranger" or "native"? I've already proved money has not a value in fact, right? only two articles. and NNWO has started to use shopping centers as wall of their pos messages. hehehe. Is it that hard for them?

they killed anyone and everything they suspect as risk. they are still killing people with great speed. But when they meet me, they send me a message using the cinema wall. And then they say, "You are not the Messiah." Yeah, I don't think so. I don't think I'm the messiah. Why can't you treat me like you treat just like other people?

What holds you to behave me that you claim an ordinary even a silly man other than you behave others? You behave me special then claim I am not special. you gonna scare me with cartoon heroes?

If your rental toy is there again, I can come next week. It was the only funny thing ;D

I did not afraid of your rental toy, but it scared of me, an ordinary human. It represents you but I know you are not as funky as it represents you. I'm waiting for your new messages. Michael's waiting too.

Its my turn again:

You are calling me as stranger, right? It actually means you have not dealed with me at all. So, he* accidentally tried to kill me. then the other one accidentally tried it, and he no longer exists. and the others tried it by mistake, and they were forgiven. You've done all kinds of evil that you can do what's trapping me, I've warned you many times.

I've warned you to not deal with me! And now, while with many of my weapons pointing at you, you say "Hello stranger". Is that credible? definitely not. I want a fair and impartial deal.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2019, 06:50:51 AM by wise »
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
Disproving moon reflecting sunlight in a minute
« Reply #186 on: September 14, 2019, 09:50:17 AM »
The light of the sun, which is 300 million kilometers away, travels along a straight line. then the light diffuses when it hits the moon with the sphere shape. Only a small part of the 3500 kilometers in diameter the moon will reflect the light to the world which 384 thousand kilometers away. it is impossible for these areas to be visible, as the rest of it will reflect light to areas outside the world. If the moon reflects only the light of the sun, it should work this way. therefore the moon must have its own light and be distributed evenly.

I'll show it on the drawing later.
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
Disproving moon reflecting sunlight in a minute II
« Reply #187 on: September 16, 2019, 04:17:11 AM »
To show you how moon reflecting sunlight through earth I've drawn the sun , earth, moon system.



in fact, all three objects are here. they do not appear because of to be very small compared to the distance. I also showed the sun's rays coming out of the sun and going to both the upper and lower parts of the moon.

This is view of 4 sun rays comes from sun and goes through moon. Upside to upside, upside to downside, downside to upside, downside to downside.



the angle to the top and bottom of the moon is approximately the same because of the distance is long. therefore, the 4 lines appear to be 2 lines. in fact, there are 4 lines in this drawing.

And this is the moon side of sun rays:



We see the angles of sun rays are still have about same angle but we can  differenciate and count them. 3 objects in the figure are close to the ideal for the about a full moon. According to the sun's rays the position of the earth and the moon is as follows:



Now, Apart from the sun rays, we have to see the part of the moon from earth as follow:



this is approximately the same as the region at the time of the full moon. therefore, we should be able to see a region near the full moon. Lets examine what sun rays do. Can they reach us, or can they not!

Since the rays coming from the sun come at about the same angle, let's send the sun's rays to the areas on the face of the moon facing the sun and examine the behavior of those rays.

This is sun rays before we examine:



When the rays strike an object, they are reflected evenly with the right angle of the angle from which they come from the object. in other words, symmetry occurs according to the perpendicular direction of the object. I think it would be better if I showed it the drawing.



Let's combine this with the region we have to see from the world. I'll use only reflected sunlight for simplify.



I've marked the reflected sun rays which have been eliminated in first attemp. Because their light literally goes to outer space, but not through earth, we never can see here by using sun rays. Inother say, we never can see sun rays reflected from there:



Only this place remained can be visible, lets extend them to see whether it cuts the seing line to out or not.



Even these centered reflected sun rays can not arrive to the earth. But we can accept these rays the visible "atmost".

In short, this place only the place can be visible from earth using the sun rays:



Full moon can be seen from earth, theorically:



in short, if we think of the moon as a mirror, the sun it will show to the world will only have a small spot on it. and this figure will be the largest moon image you can see. in other words, full moon is impossible; if the light of the moon was the reflected light of the sun.

I'm sorry to break your full moon romance. but that reflected light you see is definitely not sunlight.

Zeta came, Zeta saw, Zeta conquered.

« Last Edit: September 16, 2019, 04:27:21 AM by wise »
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
Re: Quantum Zeta Forward Level Flat Earth Science by FE Prof. Wise
« Reply #188 on: September 30, 2019, 05:32:43 AM »
We have no right of deleting posts in this section since two years. That is opposite of human rights, free speech and free give up rights.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2019, 06:33:18 AM by wise »
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
Proving the simulation
« Reply #189 on: September 30, 2019, 06:02:20 AM »
I was not me when you were you.
You were not you when I was me.
I was not you, when you were me.
You were not me when I was you.
Fucking philosophers.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2019, 06:35:10 AM by wise »
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
"Fake Sun" Shadow
« Reply #190 on: October 08, 2019, 04:36:45 AM »
Sun is fake!

There is another photo here. You can check this place a way here. A street from Quito, Equator.



What do you see here? A sunny street, a few people and cars. What else? Okay. Lets add there a virtual sun represents sun which represented at eye level for a better estimation. We see that all shdows are coming from our virtual sun.



As a last, I've compared the shadow of pole and man's shadow. We clearly see that shadow of the pole is vertical to road direction, but man's shadow is parallel to the road direction.




Whether the distance of the sun would not 150 million kilometers away, but if it were 150 kilometers, these shadows would still have to be in the same direction. however, as can be seen from the figure, there is clearly a difference of almost ninety degrees. this indicates that the sun is on a flat screen, where we show it to create shadows. In other words, this image is two-dimensional, not three-dimensional.

Another simulation victory.
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
Debunking the sun
« Reply #191 on: October 08, 2019, 05:32:35 AM »
There is another perfect example.

I have worked about for months whether the shadows caused by the sun really look different or because of the perspective. and I found this most definite example.

You can repeat all my workings like this one, to visit the page image located click here.

Look at the photo.



there are gaps in the door and light is leaking from this gap.



It seems that the direction of light in left an right come from the gap are different. Let's use the paving stones to make sure of that.



Lets count the stones.



As we see that, the left shadow has 7 degree to paving stones and the other one has 28 degrees to paving stones.

How is it possible? How. is. it. possible. ?

One more time, the sun seems as fake.
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
Re: Quantum Zeta Forward Level Flat Earth Science by FE Prof. Wise
« Reply #192 on: November 04, 2019, 03:44:04 AM »
They will find something to say like everytime they do. How can they deny the fact of shadows prove simulation other than closing their eyes?

Look at angles of shadows, how they clearly have different directions.



Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
CLOROFLOROCARBONS ARE NOT HARM TO ATMOFLAT BUT MOVES WITH MOON
« Reply #193 on: December 26, 2019, 04:38:27 AM »
Usage of chlorofluorocarbons is prohibited. my opinion is that it is not forbidden to react with ozone and damage it.

I studied a little bit to investigate the truth of what I said. I investigated the changes in the air of some fluorine compounds. there are organizations that do this. Of course, they are interested in the change from year to year. but the "monthly" changes I'm interested in. accordingly, I expect a decrease in fluoride compounds in the summer.

Fluoride is in many forms in the air. I have chosen the most common ones from the list in data below.




1)  CFC-115 Selected place: Italy

We see a list below includes measurements from many cities:



I want to chose cities belong to Europe. because in Europe I know which months are summer and which are winter. in fact, of course, I know others. in the south, it would be the opposite of ours. Anyway I don't want to deal calculating it. I've chosed Italy in this list.



exactly as I wanted, seasonal. I have marked important data for us here.
Jan2017: 8.59 (winter)
Apr2017: 8.55 (spring)
July2017: 8.56 (summer)
Oct2017: 8.60 (autumn)

we see that the CFC15 ratio is the highest in winter and autumn.



This source directly says which CFC we should examine.  ;D

Ok. CFC13.

2)  CFC-13 Selected place: Italy

The most common CFC is this gas according to source.



Jan17: 3,15
Apr17: 3,17
July17: 3,19
Oct17: 3,27

here we see that the lowest concentration is in January and the highest concentration is in October.

here we see that it is not actually as mentioned in the source, the amount of cfc115 is more than cfc13. then we must examine all of them one by one. I continue the first list.

3- CFC-114 Selected place: Italy.



I always choose the same months here. so we can calculate the total cfc amount in the same months.

Jan17: 16,33
Apr17: 16,28
July17: 16,25
Oct17: 16,33

we see that the CFC114 ratio is the highest in winter and autumn.

4)  HCFC 141b Selected place: Italy.



Jan17: 26,07
Apr17: 26,30
July17: 25,64
Oct17: 25,75

we see that the CFC141b ratio is the highest in spring and winter.

5)  CFC 142b Selected place: Italy.



Jan17: 23,79
Apr17: 23,80
July17: 23,60
Oct17: 23,20

6)  HCFC 22 Selected place: Italy.



Jan17: 251,74
Apr17: 250,45
July17: 251,39
Oct17: 253,20

7) CFC113Selected place: Italy.



Jan17: 71,39
Apr17: 71,33
July17: 70,90
Oct17: 70,87

8)  CFC 12 Selected place: Italy.



Jan17: 514,97
Apr17: 513,31
July17: 511,82
Oct17: 512,42

9)  CFC 11 Selected place: Italy.



Jan17: 231,67
Apr17: 230,78
July17: 230,04
Oct17: 230,75

The studies we have done so far show that the smaller number of cfc's is the highest. this is probably because they have been discovered before. so in the remaining time I will only examine the cfc's  have small number ones.

10)  HFC 23 Selected place: Switzerland.



Jan17: 29,95
Apr17: 30,4
July17: 30,74
Oct17: 30,97

11)  HFC 32 Selected place: Switzerland.



Jan17: 16,81
Apr17: 17,59
July17: 18,79
Oct17: 19,14
Jan18: 19,48

12)  PFC14
Selected place: Italy



Jan17: 83,63
Apr17: 84,03
July17: 84,22
Oct17: 84,39
Jan18: 84,49

January - June ratios

CFC-115 8,56-8,59= -0,03 (increase)
CFC-13 3,15-3,19= -0,04 (increase)
CFC-114 16,33-16,25=0,08 (decrease)
HCFC 141b 26,07-25,64=0,43 (decrease)
CFC 142b 23,79-23,60= 0,19 (decrease)
HCFC 22 251,74-251,39=0,35 (decrease)
CFC113 71,39-70,90=0,49 (decrease)
CFC 12 514,97-511,82=3,15 (decrease)
CFC 11 231,67-230,04=1,63 (decrease)
HFC 2329,95-30,74= -0,79 (increase)
HFC 3216,81-18,79= -1,98 (increase)
PFC14 83,63-84,22= -0,59 (increase)

As a result, chlorofluorocarbon gases decreased 7 times and increased 5 times in July. if we calculate an average figure;

Total amount of CFC: 1.278,06
Total amount of decrease: 4,07

Inother say;

Total amount of CFC decreases in July as ratio 0,3%.

Inother say,

Total amount of CFC increases in the months of winter.

Remember what they said: chlorofluoro carbon gases are thrown into the atmosphere with products used, and so the ozone layer is punctured, isn't it?

Air conditioners, refrigirators and many products in the factory is used with this gas. we use air conditioners and refrigerators in the summer months. factories also work harder in the summer. hence, the amount of these gases should have increased in the summer if they were telling the truth. however, this study reveals that the presence of these gases in the atmosphere decreased by 0.3% in the summer months. therefore, the ozone layer cannot be caused by the release of these gases into the atmosphere.

As we mentioned in the previous article, these gases come with the moon and move away with the sun and make the effect of refrigeration to the world.

In other words, not because the change in air temperature is near or far from the sun; It is caused by gases moving together with the sun and the moon.

Make a comparison as follows. you buy half a liter of gas in your home air conditioner and bring your room to a temperature of 20 degrees for 5 years, although it is 40 degrees outside. how does he do it? electrically? no. The only task of electricity is to slowly release the gas. These magical gases that do this have a very, very low temperature of -200 degrees. they have a deep freezing effect wherever they are.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2019, 04:46:20 AM by wise »
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
Double Slit Experiment
« Reply #194 on: January 19, 2020, 10:49:15 PM »
Young's Double Slit Experiment

In 1801 Thomas Young carried out an experiment in which the wave nature of light was
demonstrated. Short of experiment:



The  wavelet envisioned  by Huygen’s  in diffraction  phenomenon  is re-interpreted  as a  Polarized Wave (PW) after passing through slit/hole/or biaxial crystals which removed the electric field component from the Electromagnetic Radiation  (EM-R), the  resulted wave is what is known  as the Conical Diffraction  (CD) beam,  the  PW  is originated  from  the  Circular  Magnetic  Field  (CMF)  produced  by accelerated  electrons, integrated  with the  Electric Field  (EF) during the Flip-Flop  (F-F) mechanism  producing EM-R; hence the passing of light through a single hole/slit/biaxial crystals, resulted in a PW which reproduced as rings on the monitor screen in  single wave diffraction, while the interference of  two such PW  in double  slits experiment, produced constructive or  destructive interference forming patches on the  monitor screen;  and the  perceived electron diffraction is an enter of two CMF from an accelerated electron into two slits then emerged to interfere constructively or destructively, and appears as patches, in addition to the electron which entered and emerged from the slit with the intense CMF, the paper finally  derived the origin of Planck’ constant (h) for the second time; the logical interpretation of double slits diffraction will restore the common sense in the physical world, distorted by the pilot wave.



Now imagine shining a light (of a single colour, that is, of a single wavelength) at a wall with two slits (where the distance between the slits is roughly the same as the light's wavelength). In the image below, we show the light wave and the wall from the top. The blue lines represent the peaks of the wave. As the wave passes though both slits, it essentially splits into two new waves, each spreading out from one of the slits. These two waves then interfere with each other. At some points, where a peak meets a trough, they will cancel each other out. And at others, where peak meets peak (that's where the blue curves cross in the diagram), they will reinforce each other. Places where the waves reinforce each other give the brightest light. When the light meets a second wall placed behind the first, you will see a stripy pattern, called an interference pattern. The bright stripes come from the waves reinforcing each other.



Here is a picture of a real interference pattern. There are more stripes because the picture captures more detail than our diagram. (For the sake of correctness, we should say that the image also shows a diffraction pattern, which you would get from a single slit, but we won't go into this here, and you don't need to think about it.)



Now let's go into the quantum realm. Imagine firing electrons at our wall with the two slits, but block one of those slits off for the moment. You'll find that some of the electrons will pass through the open slit and strike the second wall just as tennis balls would: the spots they arrive at form a strip roughly the same shape as the slit.

Now open the second slit. You'd expect two rectangular strips on the second wall, as with the tennis balls, but what you actually see is very different: the spots where electrons hit build up to replicate the interference pattern from a wave.



Here is an image of a real double slit experiment with electrons. The individual pictures show the pattern you get on the second wall as more and more electrons are fired. The result is a stripy interference pattern.



How can this be?

One possibility might be that the electrons somehow interfere with each other, so they don't arrive in the same places they would if they were alone. However, the interference pattern remains even when you fire the electrons one by one, so that they have no chance of interfering. Strangely, each individual electron contributes one dot to an overall pattern that looks like the interference pattern of a wave.

Could it be that each electrons somehow splits, passes through both slits at once, interferes with itself, and then recombines to meet the second screen as a single, localised particle?

To find out, you might place a detector by the slits, to see which slit an electron passes through. And that's the really weird bit. If you do that, then the pattern on the detector screen turns into the particle pattern of two strips, as seen in the first picture above! The interference pattern disappears. Somehow, the very act of looking makes sure that the electrons travel like well-behaved little tennis balls. It's as if they knew they were being spied on and decided not to be caught in the act of performing weird quantum shenanigans.

What does the experiment tell us? It suggests that what we call "particles", such as electrons, somehow combine characteristics of particles and characteristics of waves. That's the famous wave particle duality of quantum mechanics. It also suggests that the act of observing, of measuring, a quantum system has a profound effect on the system. The question of exactly how that happens constitutes the measurement problem of quantum mechanics.

Source-1 Source-2 Source-3

What do we think about it? (My comment)

This experiment simply shows us that electrons behave like matter when they under observation, and behave like waves on their own. In fact, we have seen a similar subject on the effect of the observer on the picture.

An object's observation projection on the observer, that is, while the angular should actually have an inverse arctangent function, that is, a second degree parabola, we were seeing that object in its true form. if the object is straight, we see it straight. but we see the part we see straight, the rest acts like a wave and creates interference. If we try to combine the part of the object we are looking at and the part that we are not looking at, a meaningless image will appear.

That is, this experiment coincides with the observation we made on our own in nature.

Something behaves like a wave until we observe it. the wave is a type of energy. the same thing behaves like matter after we start seeing it. matter is another type of energy.

That is, by looking at an object, we transform it into another form. Considering that our observation is temporary and the state that we do not observe is permanent, as a result electrons are type of energy, not substance. Therefore, the world is energy, not substance. however, the part we observe turns into matter and acts like matter.

This issue can be taken further, but I do not want to continue for now as the philosophy of the business will outweigh. I added this here to review later and attract people's attention to this topic. Best regards.

Zeta came, Zeta saw, Zeta conquered.

Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 19528
  • Pize Her Yer Trabizon
440hz Conspiracy
« Reply #195 on: January 21, 2020, 05:55:32 AM »
At the urging of singers, the French government made the tuning A = 435 Hz officially standard in France in 1859, and many orchestras and Opera houses in Europe adopted this standard. In Britain, however, the French standard was interpreted in an erroneous way (it was understood as being relative to a certain temperature), due to which British orchestras commonly tuned to A = 439 Hz.

In 1939, there was an international conference held in London that resulted in a recommendation to use A = 440 Hz, as a compromise between the various tuning systems used at the time, some of which reached beyond 450 Hz. This recommendation was further supported by the fact that the BBC required their orchestras to tune to 440 Hz instead of 439 Hz because 439 is a prime number, and the corresponding frequency was hard to generate electronically with standard electronic clocks. Eventually, in 1955, the standard A = 440 Hz was adopted by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). One of Sources

The problem is that the 432hz is close to the human natural frequency and sounds better. I want to mention water sound image differences between 432hz and 440hz.



which of these do you see more clearly? The left one, right? actually hearing is a different type of seeing. What distinguishes seeing and hearing is that they have different frequencies. we classify sounds as hz, images are classified as hz too. This continues as mhz, ghz, thz... All these are categorised with Hertz units, whether sound of image. therefore, the image equivalent of a sound is actually the real image of that sound. or the sound equivalent of an image is actually the sound of that image. In other words, if you can see a picture of a sound properly, you will also hear that sound properly.

From the picture above, we can conclude that the 432hz sound is clearer than the 440hz sound.

So, why does cause to it? lets examine the natural frequency of human body. Everything in the earth has a frequency, because of everything related with energy and waves and it has a frequency. So, human body has the following resonance frequencies:



As we have seen, the natural frequency of the human body is less than 100Hz.

Another working:



It seems frequences are different but average frequency is less than 100hz one more time. Many studies reveal that the frequency of 80 hz is the average frequency of human body.

We cannot hear sounds lower than 20hz and higher than 20khz. the important thing is that the sound can be heard clearly. louder sounds cause noise. As seen in the picture above, we have a hard time distinguishing the tones of this sound. and that means straining the brain.

This situation also is related our being more active or ready to sleep. Frequency of brain waves change with activity as follow:



we see that the sleeping brain waves drop to a much lower frequency. This is why we listen to lower frequency music when we are tired, ready to sleep. however, in environments where our brain is more active, while driving fast in car, we listen to sounds at higher frequencies in noisy and moving environments because this frequency is more compatible with the current frequency of our brain.

The frequency determined by iso is a general frequency and the conditions are not considered. but we have to do this. As we usually work in calm environments in the office, the 440hz music we listen to is not compatible with the frequency of our brains and is disturbing. The 432hz frequency and even slightly lower frequencies if possible are more compatible for us.

In my opinion, it should change the iso frequency standard, and set a new frequency range to cover the frequencies that vary according to the current environment.

I suggest you to listen to two songs of the same artist. the first is 440hz, the second is 432hz. Both are beatufl songs make you relax. Both are good. Listen both and decide which one is more clear and understandable. Like the photo in the beginning of the article, right?


caution:440hz


caution:432hz

As a result, 432hz sound is more compatibled with human body than 440hz. Let's make the world beatiful.

« Last Edit: January 21, 2020, 06:06:21 AM by wise »
Quote from: Sunset
I'm having a Rab moment. I don't get the joke.
Quote from: sokarul
Draw us a 1D circle.