Quantum Zeta Forward Level Flat Earth Science by FE Prof. Wise

  • 192 Replies
  • 43580 Views
*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Hello.

I'll add all of my working to this topic part by part. This will be a database .

This is the song what I like.



My doings are garanties of what will  I do.
« Last Edit: October 23, 2018, 11:20:14 PM by wise »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Why isis is supporting the curve earth
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2016, 07:01:22 AM »
This is why isis supporting the curve earth.

This is a news.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33250937

http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/04/news/world/isis-gold/index.html

http://havokjournal.com/politics/isis-goes-gold-are-they-marching-towards-a-legitimate-state/

This is the ISIS money!



As we know that this is the curve earth map!

Compare it:

Curve earth map:



Flat earth map:



This is not a proof or evidence. This is a knowledge lets yourself be sure your side.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2017, 12:10:34 AM by İntikam »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Impossible Moon Positions!
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2016, 07:09:09 AM »
Sometimes moonlight direction don't be to the sun. I have 2 theory for this but this time i'll not talk about these theories. Just show you the NASA lie!

This is a post posted by a NASA troll:


The excellent Vsauce did a " class="bbc_link" target="_blank">video on this.

His profile is "defender of the NASA". (NASA troll)

This is my answer that anybody can't answer.

This picture from the video on the up.



And this is the answer!



This is the one of the most NASA lies!


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my working here!
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2016, 07:11:41 AM »
To be continued tomorrow...


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my workings are here!
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2016, 01:47:26 AM »
I have a problem is known as "Australia handicap". At last i found a likely explanation seems on this picture.



This explain everything for me. Flat but not completely flat. You can see everywhere on the earth by looking on the top point. Somewhere is flat, but somewhere is not. I thought beforehand that there might be the case like this.

So I'll change my working about world map from 2d to 3d and will publish the results here. This may take a few months.

I hope to prove this map because i like it.  :)
« Last Edit: March 22, 2016, 01:56:51 AM by İntikam »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
EUROPE IS COMPLETELY FLAT !
« Reply #5 on: April 07, 2016, 01:34:47 AM »
The Matter: The Europe is completely flat!
Posted on: http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66387.0
Posted at: 07.04.2016

Hello Mister good guys and mister Nasa trolls.  :)

Today we see "the europe is flat", and "the europe isn't a part of a sphere" with geometric and mathematical ways. (100 %scientific)

First we need some materyals to calculate.

First we look the site which shows directly fliying routes https://tr.flightaware.com.

And the second site shows us what the measure of the distances between the cities for the sphere earth map. https://www.distance.to You can check the values on the distance.to with calculate it by google map. i got it and see as they are same.

We need an autocad program and a little microsoft excel.  :)

So we'll creating a 2d model map to shows the distances depending on flying routes. If the world is a sphere, even if you receive the value is true  first, subsequently take off the map is very inaccurate. But we will fit the values to a 2d drawing and compare with the sphere earth model.

The way we draw:



We are drawing circles that have the value of the flying distances of the cities. And the intersection points show us the place of the next city as you see on the draw.

I calculated it for 5 cities in Europa. Paris as North West, Madrid as South West, Moscow as North East, Istanbul as South east and the Wien as the center of Europe.

we arrive at this shape:



This is a map everyone can draw or check is it true or not. Or as you see that it is drawn by the program of autocad.

This excel file shows the results and whats happened:



The error value of the flat earth map is %0,3 is  lower then the value of the mathematic error limit %0,5. ( %0,3 < %0,5)
The error value of the sphere earth map %0,8 is  higher then the value of the mathematic error limit %0,5. (%0,8 > %0,5)

So the europe is flat.
So the europe isn't a sphere. Accept or not but this is pure science!

Now you throw the first stone the person who has gain the maximum salary from NASA.

« Last Edit: April 07, 2016, 08:09:36 AM by İntikam »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Calculating the center and depth of the earth
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2016, 03:13:18 AM »
Calculating the center and depth of the earth by using a compass.



Control: Using another compass far away to first compass.

Posted to: http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66456.0



For prove or debunk it somebody need to use a compass on the Antarctica. If it shows about horizontal then the earth has one magnetic pole on the center and there isn't another pole. If it shows the bottom ot the earth then;

If the earth has two magnetic poles and one of them is the "South Pole" ; or the earth is a sphere. Or there is another magnetic case we dont understand it.

Edit. Notice:

This theory depends on the force between charged particles. F= KQq/R^2

Here is;

F= Force
K= a constant
Q= charge of the earth
q= charge of the Compass bar
R= The distance between the center of the earth and the compass.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2016, 08:32:41 AM by İntikam »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 15678
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: All of my workings are here!
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2016, 02:31:12 PM »
Very interesting! Thanks for sharing!
Quantum Ab Hoc

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my workings are here!
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2016, 12:39:03 AM »
If the sky is a space, then it must be colorless like air.

The popular (fake) science explains the colour of the sky by some nonsences is known as "science".   :o

Quote
A clear cloudless day-time sky is blue because molecules in the air scatter blue light from the sun more than they scatter red light. When we look towards the sun at sunset, we see red and orange colours because the blue light has been scattered out and away from the line of sight.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/BlueSky/blue_sky.html

But this is actually the definition of the color.

Quote
Q: What is color?
A: Color is a perception that depends on the response of the human visual system to light and the interaction of light with objects (the stimulus, sometimes referred to as the color stimulus).
http://rit-mcsl.org/fairchild/WhyIsColor/shortAs.html

Quote
How the Eye Sees Color

Color originates in light. Sunlight, as we perceive it, is colorless. In reality, a rainbow is testimony to the fact that all the colors of the spectrum are present in white light. As illustrated in the diagram below, light goes from the source (the sun) to the object (the apple), and finally to the detector (the eye and brain).

1. All the "invisible" colors of sunlight shine on the apple.

2. The surface of a red apple absorbs all the colored light rays, except for those corresponding to red, and reflects this color to the human eye.

3. The eye receives the reflected red light and sends a message to the brain.
 

The most technically accurate definition of color is:
"Color is the visual effect that is caused by the spectral composition of the light emitted, transmitted, or reflected by objects."
http://www.colormatters.com/color-and-vision/how-the-eye-sees-color
http://www.livescience.com/32559-why-do-we-see-in-color.html

Result:

As we see that the colour is an object actually is a colour which reflected light except other light colour. This is actually same with the colour of the sky and the colour of the sea.

The true colour is the colour which you see on a sunlight in the earth. So it is the colour of the sky.

The definition of the colour is compatible with the blue color of the sky and sea definition .

They are hiding the truth because if they accept the sky is blue, so it can't be a space!

So they are hiding the truth by the way denying the true colours.

The real colour proves the sky has an object has blue colour completely surrounded the earth!

Then the populer science goes to Hollywood like Frankie.  ;D
+

You see the soil as brown on the sunlight, it is brown.
You see the tree as green on the sunlight, it is green.
You see the building as  grey on the sunlight, it is grey.
You see the lime' as yellow on the sunlight, it is yellow.
You see the apple as red on the sunlight, it is red.
You see the sky as blue on the sunlight, but it is not blue. Lets get out of here idiot! These idiots are not scientists, just satanist idiots trying to hiding the truth!  :-X

Wake up!

Posted to:

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66517.0

« Last Edit: April 18, 2016, 01:45:54 AM by İntikam »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my workings are here!
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2016, 01:45:19 AM »
Hello good peoples.

In this working we'll create the real map by using "average flying distances".

Hypothesis:

1- Planes loose some times on their route by manevour and other effects.
2- Distance of the cities are consistent within the same continent.
3- There are problems with the distance between the cities on the different continents .

Method

1- Calculating the distances between the popular cities on the same continental.
2- Calculating the average wrong caused by manevour.
3- Correcting the cities on the continental map. (by using Approximate methods)
4- Getting of flights between continents .
5- Correcting the continents to true place. (by using Approximate methods)
6- The publication of results

Istanbul Ataturk _ Paris Charles De Gaulle.
Calculating the true distance:

https://tr.flightaware.com/live/findflight?origin=LTBA&destination=LFPG

Direct: 2.239 km

Just getting the planned if 2.235-2.240 kms. The others cancelled.
PLANE 1 FLEW DISTANCES (TURKISH AIRLINES)

 https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/THY1821/history/20160418/0350Z/LTBA/LFPG

2.258 km
2.324 km
2.372 km
2.417 km
2.410 km
2.407 km
2.312 km
2.388 km
2.408 km
2.316 km
2.317 km
2.398 km
2.238 km

PLANE 2 FLEW DISTANCES (AIR FRANCE)

https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/AFR1591/history/20160417/1230Z/LTBA/LFPG

2.379 km
2.357 km
2.392 km
2.342 km
2.451 km
2.377 km
2.380 km
2.730 km

PLANE 3 FLEW DISTANCES (AIR FRANCE)
https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/AFR1391/history/20160417/0315Z/LTBA/LFPG

2.545 km
2.321 km
2.340 km
2.437 km
2.431 km
2.420 km
2.449 km
2.310 km
2.394 km
2.420 km
2.299 km


PLANE 3 FLEW DISTANCES (TURKISH AIRLINES)
https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/THY1829/history/20160417/1620Z/LTBA/LFPG

2.407 km
2.315 km
2.296 km
2.398 km
2.384 km
2.428 km
2.417 km
2.387 km
2.318 km
2.316 km

Istanbul Ataturk to Paris Charles de Gaulle = 2381.07 kms



Istanbul Ataturk to Amsterdam Schiphol   (DireCt: 2.213 km    Planned: 2.212 km)

TURKISH AIRLINES
https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/THY1955/history/20160407/1630Z/LTBA/EHAM

2.267 km
2.276 km
2.273 km
2.346 km
2.289 km
2.271 km
2.277 km
2.342 km
2.291 km
2.266 km
2.337 km

KLM AIRLINES
https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/KLM1614/history/20160417/1400Z/LTBA/EHAM

2.297 km
2.287 km
2.276 km
2.262 km
2.283 km
2.363 km
2.284 km
2.284 km
2.306 km

Istanbul Ataturk to Amsterdam Schiphol = 2293.85 kms



Amsterdam Schiphol to Charles de Gaulle/Roissy Paris (Direkt: 399 km    Planned: 399 km)

AIR FRANCE
https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/AFR1241/history/20160407/0730Z/EHAM/LFPG

429 km
438 km
431 km
429 km
495 km
513 km
518 km
432 km
447 km
432 km
432 km
447 km
434 km

KLM 1229
https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/KLM1229/history/20160418/0600Z/EHAM/LFPG

439 km
454 km
436 km
432 km
465 km
446 km

Amsterdam Schiphol to Charles de Gaulle/Roissy Paris = 449.95 kms

Paris Charles de gaulle to Vienna Int. (Direkt: 1.036 km    Planned: 1.036 km)

https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/AUA412/history/20160418/0800Z/LFPG/LOWW
1.097 km
1.117 km
1.135 km
1.161 km

https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/AFR1138/history/20160418/0515Z/LFPG/LOWW
1.156 km
1.172 km
1.144 km
1.118 km
1.179 km
1.124 km
 1.327 km
1.221 km
1.118 km
1.151 km
1.115 km

Paris Charles de gaulle to Vienna Int. = 1155.67 kms

Ataturk Int. Vienna Int. (Direkt: 1.253 km    Planlanan: 1.252 km)

https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/THY1883/history/20160418/0500Z/LTBA/LOWW
https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/THY1885/history/20160417/0900Z/LTBA/LOWW

1.349 km
1.271 km
1.392 km
1.298 km
1.282 km
1.300 km
1.300 km
1.331 km
1.300 km
1.313 km
1.283 km
1.313 km
 1.334 km
1.269 km
1.286 km
1.267 km
1.265 km
1.303 km
1.321 km
1.345 km
1.319 km
1.306 km

Ataturk Int. Vienna Int. = 1.305.38 kms

Amsterdam To Vienna (direct 961)

https://tr.flightaware.com/live/flight/KLM1839/history/20160425/0450Z/EHAM/LOWW  KLM airlines

1099
1008
982
1071
995
994
1008
1015
1099
1075
1000

Amsterdam To Vienna 1031.45 kms


Table of results:

EUROPE

Istanbul Ataturk to Amsterdam Schiphol = 2293.85 kms
Amsterdam Schiphol to Charles de Gaulle/Roissy Paris = 449.95 kms
Paris Charles de gaulle to Vienna Int. = 1155.67 kms
Ataturk Int. Vienna Int. = 1305.38 kms
Istanbul Ataturk to Paris Charles de Gaulle = 2381.07 kms
Amsterdam To Vienna 1031.45 kms

Europe is finished yet.

NORTH AMERICA

To be continued...
« Last Edit: April 25, 2016, 04:05:27 AM by İntikam »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Flat Earth Proof: Rain comes from sky and clouds just an evaporation effect
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2016, 10:54:32 PM »
Hello mister and misses satans and the others;  :)

Today we see how is rain occurs and why are the clouds occur.

As we know that meteorology knows where is the next rain fall down by looking the clouds. And we think that so the clouds cause the rain. This is not true.

God said us on the various different books that the rain falls down from the sky.

As we surely know that the sky is an ocean that surrounding us. It is reasonable to be in ice to don't fall down . when it melt to water then into rain water .

To understand the mechanism we need to look this image to understand it well.

WARNING:

This image will be change after we discovered there is a water barreer in front of sun.





WARNING:

This image will be change after we discovered there is a water barreer in front of sun.


Sometimes i's a cloudy day but no rain, sometime a few clouds but raining. Because clouds just a mark shows maybe it's raining. The phrase as "rain laden clouds" completely a lie.

Good luck.  :)
« Last Edit: April 04, 2017, 12:44:46 AM by İntikam »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Einstein debunked: energy is not conserved :)
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2016, 11:18:24 PM »
Einstein debunked: energy is not conserved :)

 :-X

1st Example: Kinetic Energy.

When two bodies move in opposite direction and collide with each other, both of them will stop moving. So there kinetic energy is lost. Satanic physicists will tell you, that the energy has transformed into a kind of blabla-energy like sound or heat. But the value of the blabla-energy that  can be detected is always smaller than the value that the theory would predict. So there is loss of energy. Otherwise you could not transform the blaba-energy back into kinetic energy without a deficit. This is not the case, so the assumption, that there is no loss of energy is not provable and probably wrong.

Take what he calls Newton balance balls.



If you move the first ball, the kinetic energy translates to the next ball, and the kinetic energy is conserved. But if you move the first and the last ball simultanously (let them fall on the other balls), the movement will stop. The kinetic energy thus is not conserved. Satanic physicists will say, it has transformed into babla-energy. But can you see any blabla-energy on the first attemp? No. Therefore the Satanic physicists are wrong.

Exampe 2: The Wave Energy is not conserved:

 Waves of opposite amplitude can be annihilated by interference. Waves are energy.



So there energy gets lost.

Exampe 3: Potential Energy is not conserved:

Although the diagram shows that potential energy turns into kinetic energy, I somehow do not recognize that and say, potential energy turns into 0 + blabla-energy. Since there is no blabla-energy I have proven that the potential energy is getting lost.



I have thoroughly debunked conventional physics. I'm Intikam.

Notice: Thanks to FalseProphet for translation.  :)

Posted to: https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66551.0


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
The mechanism of Creation
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2016, 04:34:46 AM »
The mechanism of Creation

definition:

To making a pair of substance or a paior of an energy with the opposite  from The zero point, is called creation.

in mathemathichal:

0 = +1 -1

Quote
Yaratma Tanımı:

Sıfır noktasından karşıtıyla birlikte Bir enerji ya da maddenin çıkartılmasına yaratma denir.

Örnek:

Şöyle düşünelim:

Sıfır: yokluk= 0

0= -1 + 1

Sıfırı bu şekilde ayırırsanız, birbirini nötürleyen iki madde veya iki enerji oluşur.

Yok Olma:

Birbirine denk madde ya da enerji çiftinin sıfır noktasında birleşerek sıfırlanması hadisesidir.

örnek:

Bir dalga düşünün: +x yönünde V hızıyla ilerliyor. Enerjisi E

Tam ters yönden bir dalga geliyor. Onunda hızı ve ve enerjisi E.

Bu iki dalga tam da karşılaştıklarında nötürleşiyorlar. Birbirlerini nötürleştirecek formda olduklarını düşünebilirsiniz.

Bakın çarpışma sırasında açığa çıkan ses enerjisi ve kayıp enerjileri ihmal edelim, bu iki enerji birbirini nötürlüyor. +1-1=0 oldu.

Dalga enerjisinde ortada parçacık yoktur, sadece dalga olarak aktarım vardır. Bu aktarım durursa enerji yok olur. Bu, varken yok olmanın örneğidir.

Posted at 20 Jul 2011 in another forum by me.

Posted to: https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66553.0
« Last Edit: January 24, 2019, 12:55:47 AM by wise »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Description of the "disappearance"
« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2016, 04:35:36 AM »
Description of the "disappearance"

In populer science, nothing will imperishable if it is presence, nothing will created is it is imperishable. But actually this is a nonsence!

In the real life this is possible.

definition:

To disappearance a pair of substance or a paior of an energy when it encounters the opposite, is called "disappearance".

in mathemathichal:

+1 - 1 = 0

On the graphic:



posted to: https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66554.0


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Globe Earth Debunk: Why aren't there majority of the clouds on the oceans?
« Reply #14 on: April 24, 2016, 11:34:56 PM »
Globe Earth Debunk: Why aren't there majority of the clouds on the oceans?

Hello mister and misses believers, and the cheap trolls.   :)

Today we see a matter about first matter that "Flat Earth Proof: Rain comes from sky and clouds just an evaporation effect"https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=66546.0

We see the truth, so rain comes from the sky, don't come from evaporation caused by high temperature on the oceans. If it's true,

1- Why aren't there majority of the clouds on the oceans?
2- Sometimes a cloudy day it's not raining and sometimes it's raining with a few clouds on a sunny day. These cases show us the clouds aren't the exact cause for occuring the rain.
3- We must see the clouds on the oceans on every day in summer because it such as boiling pans. But we don't ! And sunny days the air in the ocean usually open like the lands.
4- We must see the clouds usually moving from oceans and seas to lands but this situation does not usually occur. Clous move random.

These substances can be increased.



Good luck.  :)

Cloudless rain.

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">

This one is better

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my workings are here!
« Reply #15 on: May 13, 2016, 01:35:21 AM »
As you see that i'm believing that "an eye for en eye, and a tooth, for a tooth". This this requires responding. I'm not Jesus and defend myself as him. So i can't turn my other face.

You know where am i going to.

Best Regards.


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my workings are here!
« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2016, 03:28:18 AM »
Why the flying time of Australia to US is shorter than estimated? because there is some "jet streams" at there. One of rounder talked about jet stream caused to be shorter of flying time from west to the east than the east to west route. So we understand what jet streams causes.

So i'll not continue to the working on the map before i learned what jet stream causes first.


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my workings are here!
« Reply #17 on: August 02, 2016, 04:10:03 AM »
To save my working from effect of "jet stream", i'll eliminate all of the flyings from west to east. Because west to east flyings are shorter than real time because of jet stream effect. This causes to change almost all distances calculated by flying times.


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my workings are here!
« Reply #18 on: September 23, 2016, 06:29:52 AM »
How does tide occur:

FE explains nothing.  FE can't talk as a human.  :)

But i can.

Just answering:

If the moon be near to the earth, it pushes to everything. Because almost everything pushes everthing.

As you see on the shape, with pressure of the moon, the waters move to the edge of the oceans like an overflowing bucket.



Don't forget, in natural world, everything pushes others. (except magnets and other illusion methods.)


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my workings are here!
« Reply #19 on: October 17, 2016, 01:25:45 AM »
Disproving round earth map by using a compass 30 cent cost.

Keep your childs far to monitor. We don't want they get zero from their geography teacher. :)





I corrected the North for Istanbul shown in Piri reis map which a great Turkish mapper known all around the world is true and the North direction on google map which famous map for round map is false!

I did this prove only with a compass and google map. It was about 30 cent cost!  :D



Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Sun rises in Lima do earlier than NY proves the earth can't be round
« Reply #20 on: October 23, 2016, 11:40:54 PM »
This is a superstition:

Quote






There is a 1 hour difference about time zones between NY and Panama. So according to NY time, sun rising in NY at 7:18 but rises in Lima at 6:38.

As we see that sun rises earlier in Lima than New York by real time, but it seems in the west on about all of round maps.

This don't disprove the earth is a round but proves round earth map is a garbage.

is wrong because:

Now the time for rounders to producing lies: Lets start.  ;D
This is the most unscientific attitude I have ever seen.

2016   Lima      New York                  
January   Sunrise   January   Sunrise                  
            Lima   New York      Lima   Corrected NY   DIFFERENCE
1   05:47:00   1   07:20:00   05:47:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:47:00   07:20:00   -01:33:00
2   05:47:00   2   07:20:00   05:47:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:47:00   07:20:00   -01:33:00
3   05:48:00   3   07:20:00   05:48:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:48:00   07:20:00   -01:32:00
4   05:49:00   4   07:20:00   05:49:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:49:00   07:20:00   -01:31:00
5   05:49:00   5   07:20:00   05:49:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:49:00   07:20:00   -01:31:00
6   05:50:00   6   07:20:00   05:50:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:50:00   07:20:00   -01:30:00
7   05:50:00   7   07:20:00   05:50:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:50:00   07:20:00   -01:30:00
8   05:51:00   8   07:20:00   05:51:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:51:00   07:20:00   -01:29:00
9   05:51:00   9   07:20:00   05:51:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:51:00   07:20:00   -01:29:00
10   05:52:00   10   07:20:00   05:52:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:52:00   07:20:00   -01:28:00
11   05:53:00   11   07:19:00   05:53:00   07:19:00   00:00:00   05:53:00   07:19:00   -01:26:00
12   05:53:00   12   07:19:00   05:53:00   07:19:00   00:00:00   05:53:00   07:19:00   -01:26:00
13   05:54:00   13   07:19:00   05:54:00   07:19:00   00:00:00   05:54:00   07:19:00   -01:25:00
14   05:54:00   14   07:19:00   05:54:00   07:19:00   00:00:00   05:54:00   07:19:00   -01:25:00
15   05:55:00   15   07:18:00   05:55:00   07:18:00   00:00:00   05:55:00   07:18:00   -01:23:00
16   05:55:00   16   07:18:00   05:55:00   07:18:00   00:00:00   05:55:00   07:18:00   -01:23:00
17   05:56:00   17   07:17:00   05:56:00   07:17:00   00:00:00   05:56:00   07:17:00   -01:21:00
18   05:56:00   18   07:17:00   05:56:00   07:17:00   00:00:00   05:56:00   07:17:00   -01:21:00
19   05:57:00   19   07:16:00   05:57:00   07:16:00   00:00:00   05:57:00   07:16:00   -01:19:00
20   05:57:00   20   07:16:00   05:57:00   07:16:00   00:00:00   05:57:00   07:16:00   -01:19:00
21   05:58:00   21   07:15:00   05:58:00   07:15:00   00:00:00   05:58:00   07:15:00   -01:17:00
22   05:58:00   22   07:15:00   05:58:00   07:15:00   00:00:00   05:58:00   07:15:00   -01:17:00
.....

December   Sunrise   December   Sunrise   Sunrise   Sunrise      Sunrise      
                           
1   05:34:00   1   07:01:00   05:34:00   07:01:00   00:00:00   05:34:00   07:01:00   -01:27:00
2   05:34:00   2   07:02:00   05:34:00   07:02:00   00:00:00   05:34:00   07:02:00   -01:28:00
3   05:34:00   3   07:03:00   05:34:00   07:03:00   00:00:00   05:34:00   07:03:00   -01:29:00
4   05:35:00   4   07:04:00   05:35:00   07:04:00   00:00:00   05:35:00   07:04:00   -01:29:00
5   05:35:00   5   07:05:00   05:35:00   07:05:00   00:00:00   05:35:00   07:05:00   -01:30:00
6   05:35:00   6   07:06:00   05:35:00   07:06:00   00:00:00   05:35:00   07:06:00   -01:31:00
7   05:36:00   7   07:07:00   05:36:00   07:07:00   00:00:00   05:36:00   07:07:00   -01:31:00
8   05:36:00   8   07:08:00   05:36:00   07:08:00   00:00:00   05:36:00   07:08:00   -01:32:00
9   05:36:00   9   07:09:00   05:36:00   07:09:00   00:00:00   05:36:00   07:09:00   -01:33:00
10   05:37:00   10   07:10:00   05:37:00   07:10:00   00:00:00   05:37:00   07:10:00   -01:33:00
11   05:37:00   11   07:10:00   05:37:00   07:10:00   00:00:00   05:37:00   07:10:00   -01:33:00
12   05:37:00   12   07:11:00   05:37:00   07:11:00   00:00:00   05:37:00   07:11:00   -01:34:00
13   05:38:00   13   07:12:00   05:38:00   07:12:00   00:00:00   05:38:00   07:12:00   -01:34:00
14   05:38:00   14   07:13:00   05:38:00   07:13:00   00:00:00   05:38:00   07:13:00   -01:35:00
15   05:39:00   15   07:13:00   05:39:00   07:13:00   00:00:00   05:39:00   07:13:00   -01:34:00
16   05:39:00   16   07:14:00   05:39:00   07:14:00   00:00:00   05:39:00   07:14:00   -01:35:00
17   05:40:00   17   07:15:00   05:40:00   07:15:00   00:00:00   05:40:00   07:15:00   -01:35:00
18   05:40:00   18   07:15:00   05:40:00   07:15:00   00:00:00   05:40:00   07:15:00   -01:35:00
19   05:40:00   19   07:16:00   05:40:00   07:16:00   00:00:00   05:40:00   07:16:00   -01:36:00
20   05:41:00   20   07:16:00   05:41:00   07:16:00   00:00:00   05:41:00   07:16:00   -01:35:00
21   05:41:00   21   07:17:00   05:41:00   07:17:00   00:00:00   05:41:00   07:17:00   -01:36:00
22   05:42:00   22   07:17:00   05:42:00   07:17:00   00:00:00   05:42:00   07:17:00   -01:35:00
23   05:42:00   23   07:18:00   05:42:00   07:18:00   00:00:00   05:42:00   07:18:00   -01:36:00
24   05:43:00   24   07:18:00   05:43:00   07:18:00   00:00:00   05:43:00   07:18:00   -01:35:00
25   05:44:00   25   07:19:00   05:44:00   07:19:00   00:00:00   05:44:00   07:19:00   -01:35:00
26   05:44:00   26   07:19:00   05:44:00   07:19:00   00:00:00   05:44:00   07:19:00   -01:35:00
27   05:45:00   27   07:19:00   05:45:00   07:19:00   00:00:00   05:45:00   07:19:00   -01:34:00
28   05:45:00   28   07:19:00   05:45:00   07:19:00   00:00:00   05:45:00   07:19:00   -01:34:00
29   05:46:00   29   07:20:00   05:46:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:46:00   07:20:00   -01:34:00
30   05:46:00   30   07:20:00   05:46:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:46:00   07:20:00   -01:34:00
31   05:47:00   31   07:20:00   05:47:00   07:20:00   00:00:00   05:47:00   07:20:00   -01:33:00

                           
                           90:24:00

All of the is examined.

Result; New York is in the more East average 90:24/365 = 15 minutes.

I looked this image and see panama as east.



But now i'm looking the map and see which one is east:



New York is in the east. Operation failed.

Nobody is perfect.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2016, 01:43:15 AM by İntikam »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my MASTER workings are here!
« Reply #21 on: November 20, 2016, 11:24:11 PM »
This is flat earth model:



According to this model; we should wait for differences of the -weather "highest and the lowest value of the temperature" of cities on the North, should be lower than south.

because nearest point of the sun and furter point of the sun is higher on the southern circle.

I researched some cities on the northern circle and southern circle; to find out is it differences of the weather on the north for a city in night and day. The results are astonishing.

First i grouped cities by South and north.



Second i  listed them by "near to sea" and far to sea.



The last i listed them by weather differences by night and day.



As we see that the results are compatibled with flat earth model.

The earth is flat.

---


An extra working about the biggest cities around the world.

Actually this cities are not spesific for this working. Because they haven't our conditions that reveal a significant difference. Notwithstanding we'll use this list for show everybody how us are impartial and objective. But end the working i'll comment the result as the perspective of weather differences and distances fo North.

Choosen cities are:

1   Shanghai(Pudong)
2   Karachi
3   Beijing
4   São Paulo
5   Dhaka
6   Delhi*
7   Lagos
8   Istanbul
9   Tokyo(RJTT)
10   Mumbai
11   Moscow
12   Guangzhou
13   Shenzhen(Shangai)
14   Suzhou
15   Kinshasa
16   Cairo
17   Jakarta
18   Lahore
19   Seoul
20   Mexico City

These cities taken by the list of "world largest cities" : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World%27s_largest_cities

At the end of the working, we found 3 cities have lowest difference of night and day tempereture that close cities to sea, meanwhile closer cities to North than others.

Cities and distances to center of the North:









































Weather temperature calculations:

1





2





3





4





5





6





7





8





9





10





11





12





13





14

No data

15





16





17





18





19





20





And the results:







Specific examples.

The places near to sea are not different obviously. Because cities near the seas impressed by the temperate influence of the sea. So we'll choose some cities from North and south circle are far to sea and will examine them by differences of temperature night and day.

First lets all us look to map to find out ideal cities for see the difference obviously.

This is Australia map:

Almost all cities are placed on inshore except one: Alice Springs.



Lets measure it to sea:



About 900 kms.

Now we'll find out other cities has the distance to sea as 900 kms for compare it by objectivity.

Lets find another city in Southern circle:



There are two cities seems like far to sea: Gaborone and Lusaka.

Lets measure them:



Gaborone has about 700 kms distance to sea. So it is not useful for our experiment.

Lets measure the other one:



864 kms. It is closed to 900 kms; so we selected Lusaka as a spesific city for our test.

Now we have two cities in Southern circle are far to sea about 860-900 kms. For compare them we need two other cities in Northern circle.

Lets look to North America.



I drawed there a line has 900 kms lenght for see about where will be stay the city which we can choose.

They seems like two cities to be possible about 900 kms to sea Edmonton and Winnipeg. Lets measure them are they true or not.



We see these two cities on same image that both of them are useful for our test.

On. Now we selected 4 cities that 2 are from south and two are fron north and have distance about 900kms. Now we eliminated the factor of distance to sea.

Although we have 4 cities, we will be picking 2 new cities for North Asia and South America.





Brasilia and Novgorod are useful.

We have 6 cities that 3 from North and 3 from south and all of them are about 900 kms far to sea. We selected all of these cities by online, right here, right now.

Brasilia, Lusaka and Alice Springs from South America, South Africa and Australia which cities are far to sea about 900 kms;

Edmonton, Winnipeg and Novgorod from North America and Asia which cities are far to sea about 900 kms.

Lets do it.

This is final image:



there is a problem on upload site so i used another one.

At the end of the this working, all of 3 cities in the northern circle have lower day and night temperature differences than the cities on the south; which have same distance to the sea.

CITY /   PLACE / AVERAGE YEARLY TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE   
Novgorod     North   8,25
Edmonton    North   9,00
Winnipeg    North   10,17
Lusaka    South   10,33
Brasilia    South   11,25
Alice Springs    South   15,42

I'll add all of city data later.

Yet i added only data of January.













imgsafe is not a safesite oppositely it's name . I'll change it later to another one. so i did'nt add all of images to it.

Silence is to approve.

@All rights reserved


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my ADVANCED MASTER workings are here!
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2017, 11:23:51 PM »
Explanation about real shape of the earth. This is only fact what is hidden from you.

Take care where is the most high points on "world altitude map". Antarctica.  (3nd and 4th shape)



Also explanation about my map version 2 on below.




Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my ADVANCED MASTER workings are here!
« Reply #23 on: January 19, 2017, 02:59:50 AM »
Only a part of vacuum holder beats gravity.



As we see that only a part of vacuum holder is pulling up the material and beats the gravity. Also you can beat gravity with basic jumping up. But you can't escape from a vacuum holder by jumping.

But if you listen to popular professors, heard they say about vacuum power as, -10^3 , limit, integral, differentiation so gravity is bigger. Fuck off ! Fuck of bitches!


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my ADVANCED MASTER workings are here!
« Reply #24 on: January 20, 2017, 04:09:50 AM »
I was forgot to add alternative sysmology here:

Ocean wawes causes  to big earthquakes.

Think about the earth as a ship. It shakes and swashes.

I want to explain how systemworks, under the pretext of this topic.

This the list of countries by has earth Seismic risk.

1.    JAPAN (80)   7.08   6.7188 %
2.    INDONESIA (57)   7.05   4.7646 %
3.    CHILE (52)   7.36   4.5405 %
4.    PAPUA NEW GUINEA (49)   6.91   4.0152 %
5.    MEXICO (36)   7.19   3.0677 %
6.    TURKEY (36)   7.01   2.9942 %
7.    ALASKA (28)   7.55    2.5056 %
8.    CALIFORNIA (30)   7.01   2.4938 %
9.    PERU (27)   7.45   2.3859 %
10.    CHINA (27)   7.38   2.3621 %
11.    VANUATU (28)   6.96   2.3112 %
12.    SOLOMON ISLANDS (23)   7.03   1.9175 %
13.    IRAN (22)   7.09   1.8499 %
14.    SUMATRA (20)   7.77    1.8428 %
15.    RUSSIA (20)   7.43   1.7621 %
16.    GREECE (19)   7.06   1.5902 %
17.    TAIWAN (18)   7.21   1.5392 %
18.    FIJI (18)   6.99   1.4918 %
19.    PHILIPPINES (16)   7.17   1.3601 %
20.    NEW ZEALAND (16)   7.16   1.3589 %

You can find out same list at: http://www.world-earthquakes.com/index.php?option=sta

Lets examine the countries in the list one by one, depends on "ship" theory.

First we should thik the earth as a ship that floating in the sea. The sea waves beats to edges. These beats cause to shaking. On the other way, the ship getting water from mediterranian area.

1    JAPAN : Is in the edge of the earth. So  the waves transfer energy by multiplying.
2.    INDONESIA: Is in the edge of the earth.
3.    CHILE : Is in the edge of the earth.
4.    PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Is in the edge of the earth.
5.    MEXICO : Is in the edge of the earth.
6.    TURKEY *: ...    We will examine it later. *
7.    ALASKA (28): Is in the edge of the earth.
8.    CALIFORNIA : Is in the edge of the earth.
9.    PERU (27) Is in the edge of the earth.
10.    CHINA (27) Is in the edge of the earth.
11.    VANUATU Is in the edge of the earth.
12.    SOLOMON ISLANDS Is in the edge of the earth.
13.    IRAN (22)*: ...    We will examine it later. *
14.    SUMATRA (20) Is in the edge of the earth.
15.    RUSSIA (20) Is in the edge of the earth.
16.    GREECE (19)*: ...    We will examine it later. *
17.    TAIWAN (18) Is in the edge of the earth.
18.    FIJI (18) Is in the edge of the earth.
19.    PHILIPPINES Is in the edge of the earth.
20.    NEW ZEALAND Is in the edge of the earth.

Lets examine other 3 countries:

6.    TURKEY
13.    IRAN
16.    GREECE

Since tousends of years Euro-Africa land crashed and got water. Then Mediterranian sea occured. Water is continue the way till that will destroy Greece-Turkey-Iran line. Will make them smaller like center America. In the other say the Turkey side of the ship is sinking in the water.



This is the sismology map that you can use it as an alternative theory.

For perspective of round map:



This map taken from here: http://earthquaketrack.com/

The situation is clear.

Notice: The list contain risk more than 6.5 of earthquakes. Richter scale 1 degrees decreases but power 10 level decreasing. So the less earthquakes are weak as like the sway of the ship; don't effect important.

For example 6.5 richter is 10 level more than 5.5 richter. And 7,5 richter is 100 level more than 5,5.

This shape supports it:



Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Debunking Brian Cox gravity experiment in vacuum for BBC
« Reply #25 on: January 24, 2017, 11:06:26 PM »
Hello guys,

We are together again with debunking a fucking lie of graviters.

There is a video comparing two objects which one of them heavy and other one is light. One of them is a ball and second one is a down. First they are compered with free falling and ball falled first. They connect it to "air friction". The second test in no air vacuum and they fallen with same time. Is it really? No. We'll learn in another topic that obcejts falling time connected with their weights and gravity is a lie. But first, we should to debunk this fucking experiment.

Lets watch now.



Everything seems like okey ha? Gravity is proven. Is it really? Take a look more carefully.

Come to: 4:16 Catch that picture:



Objects start about same point.

Come to finish line, 4:30



The distances of them aren't changed in fallen time. So they moved together. And this situation proves the gravity. Is it real? No. Come back to 4:14 and move the video slowly again.

Now come to: 4:16 and catch this image:



Where is ball?

Ball is faster and made significant difference in only 1st second.

So the difference of them must increase according to The usual continuation of their movements.

But falls in same time:



Fake. Debunked. I don't accept appeals because everything is clear.

So this man, Brian Cox is a liar, a dishonest, dishonored one !

Proffssor ha professor! Professor of being a son of whore !

PS. Before "real time experiment", there is some "slow motion showings before it but they are all fake and cartoon. Only the experiment in 4:16-4:30 is real time experiment and we proven it is fake. Added to my working sector .

This fake experiment proves how graviters are dishonest, dishonored ones!

images are updated.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2018, 06:22:59 AM by brotherhood of the dome »


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
True layers of the earth explains : How volcanos occur
« Reply #26 on: January 31, 2017, 05:07:09 AM »
Hi people.

This is the layers of the earth structure.

With this shape, it is more easier to understand tectonic movements.



This the true shape of the layers. There is a lav layer under the solid layer.



There is a balance between powers of:

solid-lav

lav-solid

solid-water

The layer on the top "solid layer" is balanced with oceans and atmospher together that is not examined on this issue.

If balance of them breaks down by some reasons as "natural disasters" or "human made" factors occured.



Then the balance of "solid-lav" breaks down.

After balance breaks down, upper forces are bigger than downer forces like the up shape. Then lav finds a way to exceed solid layer.



Then volcano occurs.

After lav enough moved up to land, balance occurs again and volcano stops.



This is the true layer of the earth. If you believe, or not.


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my ADVANCED MASTER workings are here!
« Reply #27 on: February 23, 2017, 10:58:27 PM »
It is absolutely. Because everything turns around him according to several religinal books. And everything is turning around North Celestial Pole.

Shoot and gool.  8)

 8)

This is nothing about matter.



Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my ADVANCED MASTER workings are here!
« Reply #28 on: March 05, 2017, 11:49:46 PM »
There is insufficient support here. On the other hand, here is a place that controlled opposite and probably in the hand of CIA. In other say, I'm getting dead threatenings insomuch as from moderators.

With this conditions, I decided To transfer this issue a stronger formation. These are a well-known formation in Turkey and the world. We have a meeting on wednesday with this foundation. I prepare a "presentation" in the next 2 days. I hope the meeting will be positive and this fact Will be much stronger with them. I hope.


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18764
  • Backstage
Re: All of my ADVANCED MASTER workings are here!
« Reply #29 on: March 09, 2017, 12:13:20 PM »
The meeting with some of the anticapitalist muslims was completely a fiasco. I do not want to talk about them anymore. I'll back here with my workings next a few days.


Simply ignored: mjohn61 (age)



http://www.unz.com/article/the-moon-landing