Direct observation is not the only kind of observation.
Nice strawman!
But, as no-one has ever, via
any kind of Observation, witnessed a live microbe being created out of the elements of the periodic table, plasma, etc, my point very much stands.
There is no scientific basis for evolution whatsoever.
None.
Thus, it is a matter of Opinion, or Faith, & ergo a Religion.
Just like Atheism is.
A Religion for brain-damaged emotional cripples, as it goes...
As you all are Proving with every brain-damaged, emotionally-crippled & evidence-phobic post you make.
Let me show you something Conker wrote to drive home my point:
it is my opinion that science is the best and most reliable method to ascertain information about reality.
He claims that, yet I have just Proved that Evolution has no scientific basis.
Will he change his Opinion then?
No; of course not.
Instead, he will spam endless tl;dr streams of WORDS at me in an attempt to make his desired REALITY become 'scientific fact'.
This is what you all do.
And it is why I have said, right from the start, that you all mistake WORDS for REALITY.
Neutrals might wonder why you do that...
I do not.
I know.
And it is Lulzy as all get-out!
Toodle-pip, JREF Losers!
Oh & p.s:
Or perhaps the burden of proof is on the atheist. Since one normally assumes that a thing had a creator, to assume otherwise requires strong justification as to why.
Quite.
Which is why I'm in for a VERY long & boring wait for my microbe...