In any developed nation today, but especially so in Northern and Western Europe, the political response to various existential crises is effectively the same whether the party or politician claims to be liberal, conservative, socialist, or progressive. The whole lot of these people, parties, and positions have been captured or are fundamentally tied to the very anti-progressive faux egalitarianism that stems from cultural Marxism. Western civilization has ceased to defend or improve itself, and instead become all to often literally cuckolded by 3rd world immigrant populations. I think we all know via the copious amounts of evidence, common sense, and even direct self-implication (courtesy of people like Barbara Spectre) exactly who and what is responsible for this.
Some people have organized and once again taken up in active opposition to these "bourgeois elements", but the political establishment has (by virtue of their true masters) a very thorough media stranglehold that prevents effective democratic competition. In places like Poland and Hungary, where this element is weaker and more transparent, we have secured some legitimate victories, and in France there is certainly potential, but on the whole I think it is foolish to believe that we can rely on the democratic process to address our grievances. And our grievances are many, from the everyday, outright criminal behaviors of invading populations to the subversion and in some cases outright destruction of Western cultural heritage, especially in education.
Ultimately, though, it is not the "bourgeois elements" that we have to blame, nor Marxists - cultural and otherwise, nor even the immigrants themselves. The problem is actually one of Christfaggotry. So long as the West continues to chain itself to a zombie kike, it will always be cuckolded, in one fashion or another, and today it takes on a very literal meaning for many. Religiosity is not a feature of Western society and culture. It is a disease, carried by "eastern" parasites, which has always been at odds with the rational and progressive ends of our empyrean project of civilization. Any revolution - democratic or authoritarian, peaceful or armed - against this doomed status quo is destined to failure unless it finally puts this "faithful herd" out to pasture.
While historically an erstwhile ally, liberalism and the whole Enlightenment understanding of the individual are religious, and sometimes explicitly Christian, and more importantly, are today considered integral to the religious as a whole. Furthermore, with few exceptions, liberals today have lost their bite and even their bark on the issue of exterminating this toxic meme. The last real, meaningful, progressive efforts by liberals occurred under the Kemalists and some Arabists, but now the tables have turned very bleakly for both groups and against the West itself. Conservatism, always an enemy, of course is opportunistic and dull in its degenerate support of both the religious and the "bourgeois elements" who control them. Real Marxism and the project of socialism more broadly have simply floundered and died since the collapse of the USSR, and in any case were never particularly reliable. "Progressivism" has been redefined in such a way that it presents an almost comically antagonistic front. While there are some nationalists, and to them we should generally lend democratic support, the notion of actual progress is almost always abandoned in favor of reactionary and religious drivel - whether it's Christian or "Odalist" in nature.
In the end I think the only way forward is for genuine elites to take advantage of technology and modern social structures to 'reform away' these issues without popular consent or knowledge. Of course that plan has perhaps the most glaring flaw imaginable, in its ability to be easily frustrated by the "bourgeois elements" who represent the ominpresent secondary or tertiary antagonist behind our more mundane problems.
It may well be that it is only the "bourgeois elements" who have the means to oversee and implement the next stage of human progress, but I don't yet know whether I'm inclined to support that, or whether they are ultimately interested in any case. Certainly something to ponder, at least.