Nice to see you are trying to learn logic. About time too. Let me add to your learning:
1. The "evidence" you space cultists have for the iss thing being real is: some youtube videos, a few random internet photos, and maths. All of which are easily faked or misunderstood.
2. The evidence I have that it is all fake memes-for-scientism is point 1.
That's the same logical fallacy as before, but it is a clear and succinct illustration of
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence a.k.a. argument from incredulity. Thanks for taking the trouble, but, unfortunately, I've already seen that, often from you (especially in the last few posts), many times. Even
if the first point
were true (it's not), the second point would
not necessarily be true. Do you have anything
new, something that hasn't already been shown to be a fallacy?
Here's something you may not have considered: Since Point 1 is false, and Point 2 depends on Point 1 being true, then Point 2 is also false. We can tell that Point 1 is false by finding a single instance you didn't mention. I've seen it for myself, and can tell it's the ISS by its distinctive shape, and it was in exactly the predicted position it was supposed to be, in different locations, so it has to be at the advertised height (triangulation, y'know?) You could, too,
if you knew how; but even if you can't (or claim you can't) successfully locate the ISS, your inability to accomplish a relatively simple task (or admit you did) has no effect on its existence whatsoever. Ergo, Point 1 is falsified. Cool, huh?
So, since your Point 2 is falsified for at least a couple of reasons (it really only takes one, but consider the other another free lesson in logic), you're still without any evidence whatsoever. I'll wait.
Seeing as nobody has given any compelling evidence to suggest that the apollo missions were genuine (in feuk's thread), I must conclude that you space cultists have been fooled ever since the 1960's.
I am of course prepared to adjust my position should any evidence be presented.
Well, since the
very first reply [note the nice link to the referenced post as a courtesy, to make sure you found the right one] provided evidence (not to mention all the evidence in posts that follow, but that's moot), then you need to adjust your position. It's good that you're wiling to do that. There's hope yet!