I'll take that as a no, then. 
What, you think it's a theory?
the·o·ry
ˈTHēərē/Submit
noun
a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.
This definition follows the only logic you FE people seem to apply to these arguments. Vagueness and inherent lack of credibility. See in the scientific community, the definition that you supplied here would be fitting of not a theory, but a hypothesis. An inclination to explain some underlying principles or events. A theory in the scientific sense is a reliable and accurate (not to mention excruciatingly detailed) model formulated upon tested and true hypothesis. Basically, it's some next level shit compared to the ideology presented by FE. FE contains no probable grounds upon which it is entitled theoretical status. I'm not here to sway anybody to RE over FE, I simply disagree with the logic (or lack thereof) that is continually applied by avid FE-ers in their humiliating and mundane attempts at thwarting RE. To be completely honest, I had never realized until a few days ago that this flat earth society even exists. It's been intriguing to explore the concepts and ideas that few have presented in an intelligent and practical or even plausibly accurate way, but I have yet to see fruitful evidence supporting any of these wild assertions. A model cannot work with out providing testable and measurable predictions. Even then, these predictions must agree with the actual system that these models serve to describe and must do so time and time again, under extreme scrutiny, skepticism and indeed even disbelief. It is the models that survive this onslaught over time and still maintain accuracy and integrity (almost always gaining advancements in both), that are suitable as a theoretical framework for any system. The FE model as I have so far come to understand it (far from perfectly), does not fit into this criteria. It's like a kid that got held back a grade every year, but for the last (couple? Few?) Thousands of years. It never dropped out of the race to finish, just has not made any progress. Redundancy is a burden more often than not, but certainly within the scope of collective human knowledge and understanding. If you have any actually testable evidence that may lenders credence to the FE model's legitimacy as anything but complete garbage, I'd love to hear it.