No, "all time high" refers to a single data point, not a trend, in spite of your language disability, I would have thought this was obvious.
"Language disability"? I'd be curious to know how many languages you speak fluently. I also revel in the hypocrisy of you calling me arrogant when you've just proclaimed you consider someone's place of birth to be a "disability".
You may also want to double-check your definitions before opening your mouth again. You know, something about not talking about things you don't understand:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/high#british-1-2-1We are experiencing a higher level of views than ever before. Since these things are highly volatile, no one ever pays attention to singular data points. This isn't a language issue, this is a "Rayzor behaves like a climate change denier" issue. You're focusing on a single data point that advances your hypothesis and completely ignoring everything that surrounds it.
In other words, you're the guy who claims that the Earth isn't flat (or round, for that matter) because hills and valleys exist. Sure, they do. Nobody cares.
And, no, I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, I'm pointing out the data you posted. Whether you understood the data is the question.
The highlighted date is the 23rd, so the peak is the 26th.
I understand the data, but I also understand why focusing on a single anomaly is ultimately fruitless. Perhaps another graph will help you understand why peaks don't matter.
One more, this time from the Wiki
These things happen every now and then, almost with some regularity, and they mean absolutely nothing in the long term. My prediction is that this situation will be no different from other "major events", and that the views will drop back down to the level from 21st-22nd January and then continue slowly trending up.
Now, tell me again how it was the web page redesign, and not the spill over from B.o.B's tweets.
No one but you is saying it's due to a redesign. Again, you talk about things you don't understand, even though most of the data you need is available on GitHub. But hey, I'll just assume that you meant to use the right word there and I'll carry on with a response.
Simple: We followed Google's recommendations, which have advanced our standing in search results. This happened long before B.o.B's tweets. Since then, we're experiencing a gradual increase in views over time, adjusting for small anomalies like Tila Tequila or B.o.B.
It also couldn't have been a spill-over from B.o.B's tweets because time is, at least from a layman's perspective, largely linear. His tweets can't go back in time to cause this gradual increase.
I'm beginning to understand why a merge is unlikely.
I don't think you're beginning to understand anything. The reason the merge isn't proceeding is that the only person who can perform the relevant tasks on this website has gone AWOL approximately one year ago. I tried to wget him, but for some reason that didn't work.
Y'know, something something talking about things you don't understand.