moon hoax information index.

  • 1150 Replies
  • 252581 Views
*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #990 on: August 31, 2016, 10:47:26 AM »
So, it is not more economical to turn the power up a little for a laser than to send space men to the moon?  You are very confusing. 

?

frenat

  • 3752
  • +0/-2
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #991 on: August 31, 2016, 10:56:20 AM »
So, it is not more economical to turn the power up a little for a laser than to send space men to the moon?  You are very confusing.
I still never made a claim either way.  And you are still avoiding the question "Was placing the retroreflector the only purpose of the Moon landings?"  Obvious troll is obvious.

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #992 on: August 31, 2016, 10:57:18 AM »
Except for the part where we were supposedly bouncing lasers off the moon almost a decade before the first supposed moon landing.  Think about what you say before you say it.

Source?

The first successful tests were carried out in 1962 when a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology succeeded in observing laser pulses reflected from moon's surface using a laser with a millisecond pulse length.[2]


Cool. The rest is even cooler. Since that is the bit that proved something changed after the moon landing.

Quote
Greater accuracy was achieved following the installation of a retroreflector array on July 21, 1969, by the crew of Apollo 11, and two more retroreflector arrays left by the Apollo 14 and Apollo 15 missions have also contributed to the experiment. Successful lunar laser range measurements to the retroreflectors were first reported by the 3.1 m telescope at Lick Observatory, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories Lunar Ranging Observatory in Arizona, the Pic du Midi Observatory in France, the Tokyo Astronomical Observatory, and McDonald Observatory in Texas.
Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #993 on: August 31, 2016, 11:00:01 AM »
Wait a minute. Did jroa just admit that the distance of the moon is what science says and that this proves the earth is round?
Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #994 on: August 31, 2016, 11:01:54 AM »
Now I am wondering what is so confusing about the word "supposedly" to you. 

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #995 on: August 31, 2016, 11:06:06 AM »
Now I am wondering what is so confusing about the word "supposedly" to you.

So... what is your point then? That no-one ever shot lasers at the moon to measure its distance? That they did and are hiding the truth?

What the hell are you saying?

From where I am sitting, it seems like you fill your days by firing obtuse sarcastic remarks at this forum for no apparent reason.

 
Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #996 on: August 31, 2016, 11:08:27 AM »
Now I am wondering if the English language is just too confusing for you. 

*

feuk

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 570
  • +0/-0
  • ^ hmmmmm
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #997 on: August 31, 2016, 11:09:56 AM »
Why I know the moon landings are real; Every single attempt to prove them a hoax has been completely and without question, debunked beyond any and all reasonable doubt.

If you really believe you have ironclad proof it was a hoax, find a lawyer and file a civil case.

 :D
"beyond any and all reasonable doubt"
 :D

I'm all ears.



Any newbies who feel like they could pick up the baton ?
The old guard up thread made a bit of a pigs ear of it.

I await with interest.

well and truly beyond any reasonable doubt. ANd in addition, you have provided ZERO evidence to the contrary. That makes it one million bits of pro-evidence and zero con-evidence.

QED
Can I humbly request that you read the thread.
HTHs
"How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."
"Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It's not easy to become sane."

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #998 on: August 31, 2016, 11:12:39 AM »
Now I am wondering if the English language is just too confusing for you.

It's not the language that's confusing. It's the person using it.

I don't understand what you try to say. Or if there is indeed any purpose to it at all.

Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #999 on: August 31, 2016, 11:14:37 AM »
I don't understand

I think we are constantly getting closer to the root cause. 

*

feuk

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 570
  • +0/-0
  • ^ hmmmmm
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1000 on: August 31, 2016, 11:15:58 AM »
all you ahve to do is google 'apollo landing sites from space' and see all the photos of the landing sites from lunar orbit.

Naturally, you think they are faked because that is your go-to argument when thoroughly flogged in debate.
:D
Just miniscule ambiguous pixels out of white sands.

Got anything independent of nasa ?
"How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."
"Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It's not easy to become sane."

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1001 on: August 31, 2016, 11:16:37 AM »
I don't understand

I think we are constantly getting closer to the root cause.

All knowledge starts with the words 'I don't know'.

Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

feuk

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 570
  • +0/-0
  • ^ hmmmmm
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1002 on: August 31, 2016, 11:19:18 AM »
There are not long ago installed light reflectors on Moon surface
used by lasers to precisely measure Moon distance with accuracy
within 1 cm limits.

The existance of light reflectors placed on Moon's surface to return laser beams / pulses
is proof that something DID land on the Moon.

Reports about placing and directing those reflectors confirm it were humans.

Who else, if you claim that aliens don't exist?
Yawn

The soviets also make the claim of putting retroreflectors on the moon, these have also being allegedly used.

Next
"How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."
"Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It's not easy to become sane."

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1003 on: August 31, 2016, 11:20:16 AM »
I don't understand

I think we are constantly getting closer to the root cause.

All knowledge starts with the words 'I don't know'.



That is not even what you said.  I know you struggle with the English language, and I am trying my best to work with you, but at least read the words. 

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1004 on: August 31, 2016, 11:21:27 AM »
I don't understand

I think we are constantly getting closer to the root cause.

All knowledge starts with the words 'I don't know'.



That is not even what you said.  I know you struggle with the English language, and I am trying my best to work with you, but at least read the words.

Sigh.
Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1005 on: August 31, 2016, 11:22:22 AM »
There are not long ago installed light reflectors on Moon surface
used by lasers to precisely measure Moon distance with accuracy
within 1 cm limits.

The existance of light reflectors placed on Moon's surface to return laser beams / pulses
is proof that something DID land on the Moon.

Reports about placing and directing those reflectors confirm it were humans.

Who else, if you claim that aliens don't exist?
Yawn

The soviets also make the claim of putting retroreflectors on the moon, these have also being allegedly used.

Next

We all know know Soviets aren't human...
Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

feuk

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 570
  • +0/-0
  • ^ hmmmmm
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1006 on: August 31, 2016, 11:24:15 AM »
I don't understand

I think we are constantly getting closer to the root cause.

  :D
"How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."
"Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It's not easy to become sane."

*

Omega

  • 929
  • +0/-0
  • Debating honestly even if no-one else will
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1007 on: August 31, 2016, 11:27:30 AM »
I don't understand

I think we are constantly getting closer to the root cause.

  :D

Laugh it up, fuzzball. Last time I checked *you* where the one thinking the Earth is flat and that the moon landings never happened.
Only thing round in FE is its circular logic.

*

feuk

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 570
  • +0/-0
  • ^ hmmmmm
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1008 on: August 31, 2016, 12:19:46 PM »
I don't understand

I think we are constantly getting closer to the root cause.

  :D

Laugh it up, fuzzball. Last time I checked *you* where the one thinking the Earth is flat and that the moon landings never happened.

 :D :D
"How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."
"Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It's not easy to become sane."

*

neutrino

  • 635
  • +0/-0
  • FET is a religion. You can't fight faith.
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1009 on: August 31, 2016, 02:34:34 PM »
Well, there is no Moon. Moon doesn't exist. It's all NASA Nazis hologramming above there. Why? would you ask. Because:
0) From Flat Earth it is impossible to see only one face of Moon
1) From Flat Earth it is impossible to see same phase of moon from all over the plane
2) From Flat Earth it is impossible to see Moon 'upside down' in southern 'hemisphere'.

So taking into consideration all these FACTS, the Moon doesn't exist. It's a hologram/eye bug/brainwashing.
FET is religion. No evidence will convince a FE-er. It would be easier to convince Muslims they are wrong.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1010 on: August 31, 2016, 03:49:50 PM »
Except for the part where we were supposedly bouncing lasers off the moon almost a decade before the first supposed moon landing.  Think about what you say before you say it.

Yes, you really should "Think about what you say before you say it", but you never learn!

Perhaps you are simply ignorant about science?

Yes, the first laser pulse reflected from the moon was in 1962, but if you look into it, you will find a dramatic improvement in accuracy since the corner reflectors were installed.

You can read a bit about it in:
Reminescenses of Early Work at MIT and ESRIN 1963-1974
But these early experiments needed very high power and comparatively long pulse lengths (around 1 ms in the 1962 MIT case), so could not achieve very high accuracy. I could not find much of the accuracy of this one, bit a later one (still without corner reflectors) described in
Quote from: A. Orszag, Ecole Poly technique, Paris
On page 1687: 3 .1. Accuracy of Distance Measurement
This accuracy is limited by several factors:
(a) The duration of the pulse emitted by the laser, that is, about 50 nsec. This time interval corresponds to an uncertainty of 15 m in the distance.

From: Moon Distance Measurement by Laser

And have a look at:
Quote from: Wikipedia
May 9, 1962: Laser beam first used to measure distance to the moon
In 1962, laser technology was a new and exciting science. Lasers produce a light that is intense, coherent, and monochromatic. The beam of light emitted by a laser is also extremely narrow. It would be impossible to bounce a flashlight beam off the moon, as the light disperses too much to travel any distance. But a laser beam is so narrow that it can make the roughly 239,000 mile journey to the moon and still be detected back on Earth. The first time this was done, MIT scientists using a ruby laser to bounce a light beam off the moon in a series of pulses, estimated that its area on the moon's surface was just four miles in diameter. Later they were able to reduce this to under 2 1/2 miles.
From Cosmeo View Today In History Events

The later measurements with the corner reflectors have achieved millimeter accuracy, enough to determine that the Moon is spiraling away from Earth at a rate of 3.8 cm per year - a figure unexpectedly high.

This is the improvement in precision of measurement from the first retro-reflectors:
Quote
In the early days one of the biggest challenges was discerning returning photons from "stray" photons. MLRS would fire 1014 or 1015 photons to the moon and only about 10 or so returned to the photodetector, so being able to verify them was absolutely essential. "We devised a four-filter system," says Peter Shelus, senior research scientist at UT-Austin's Center for Space Research and member of the MLRS team. "First, we opened the detector to the sky just before we thought the photons were due back - about 2.5 seconds later. Second, we used a pinhole aperture only a few arc seconds in diameter to look at a very small part of the surface of the moon. The third filter was spectral -- we fired red light from the ruby laser or green from neodymium and looked for those wavelengths coming back in. The fourth filter was mathematical to neutralize noise in the photodetector."

Figure 4.
Increasingly the trend at LLR stations has been toward narrower laser pulses and greater accuracy (Fig. 4). Today satellite laser ranging stations such as RGO (UK) and Graz (Austria) are favoring super-short pulse kiloHertz lasers. Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser Ranging Operation (APOLLO), the most advanced LLR station in the world, uses a 3.5-meter telescope and 532 nm Nd:YAG laser (100 ps pulse duration, 115 mJ/pulse, 20 Hz). "We routinely achieve 1-mm precision with a 7-picosecond round-trip travel-time error," indicates Tom Murphy, director of APOLLO and associate professor of physics at University of California, San Diego. "Our APD array is a working prototype from MIT's Lincoln Labs in a 4x4 format with 30-µm diameters on 100-µm centers. Photon detection efficiency is about 50 percent."
From: Lunar laser ranging: 40 years of high-level science

So sure, laser moon distance measurements were made as early as 1962, but there has been a dramatic improvement in accuracy since corner reflectors were installed.

Finally how do you reconcile the 239,000 miles or so measured by a number of methods with FE "a bit over 3,000 miles" purely guessed?

I am sure, Mr Jroa that you are quite aware of these facts, but present your rubbish claims simply to disrupt the debate!

You should realise that it simply makes you look ignorant, but if that's the impression you want to leave, keep it up! It's working perfectly.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2018, 03:33:11 AM by rabinoz »

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1011 on: August 31, 2016, 07:11:45 PM »
So, it would be more economic to not use their presence there?

Since they were already there, tell me why they wouldn't also set the reflectors?
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1012 on: August 31, 2016, 07:31:51 PM »
Now I am wondering if the English language is just too confusing for you.

It's not the language that's confusing. It's the person using it.

I don't understand what you try to say. Or if there is indeed any purpose to it at all.
::) After studying these earlier posts I think I finally see your problem!  ::)
You are confusing this     with a human!

Just apply the "Duck test": "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck".
We could maybe transfer it: "If it looks like a human, walks like a human, and writes like a human, then it probably is a human".

Well it certainly doesn't "look like a human", "walk like a human", nor "write like a human", so  it probably isn't a "human".
Any help?

And, the skulls complained that I had my spell checker set to English (me, a fair dinkum Aussie)!
Mind you, as near as I could find, the words used were in Basque as Scottish Gaelic in the same sentence.

Well, that's my story and I'm stickin' to it!

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1013 on: August 31, 2016, 07:43:15 PM »
So, it would be more economic to not use their presence there?

Since they were already there, tell me why they wouldn't also set the reflectors?


It depends on your definition of economy.

Now I am wondering if the English language is just too confusing for you.

It's not the language that's confusing. It's the person using it.

I don't understand what you try to say. Or if there is indeed any purpose to it at all.
::) After studying these earlier posts I think I finally see your problem!  ::)
You are confusing this     with a human!

Just apply the "Duck test": "If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck".
We could maybe transfer it: "If it looks like a human, walks like a human, and writes like a human, then it probably is a human".

Well it certainly doesn't "look like a human", "walk like a human", nor "write like a human", so  it probably isn't a "human".
Any help?

And, the skulls complained that I had my spell checker set to English (me, a fair dinkum Aussie)!
Mind you, as near as I could find, the words used were in Basque as Scottish Gaelic in the same sentence.

Well, that's my story and I'm stickin' to it!

Why do you hate the Scottish so much?  Did one steal your beer or make out with your sister or something? 

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1014 on: August 31, 2016, 07:53:01 PM »
So, it would be more economic to not use their presence there?

Since they were already there, tell me why they wouldn't also set the reflectors?


It depends on your definition of economy.
 

My definition of economy would be to use their presence while they are already there.
It is cheaper than to use stronger lasers all the time.

Why do you have problem with that?
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1015 on: August 31, 2016, 07:55:27 PM »
So, it would be more economic to not use their presence there?

Since they were already there, tell me why they wouldn't also set the reflectors?


It depends on your definition of economy.
 

My definition of economy would be to use their presence while they are already there.
It is cheaper than to use stronger lasers all the time.

Why do you have problem with that?


Oh, so your definition of economy involves a trillion dollars to send space men to the moon.  Nice to know. 

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1016 on: August 31, 2016, 07:59:52 PM »
So, it would be more economic to not use their presence there?

Since they were already there, tell me why they wouldn't also set the reflectors?


It depends on your definition of economy.
 

My definition of economy would be to use their presence while they are already there.
It is cheaper than to use stronger lasers all the time.

Why do you have problem with that?


Oh, so your definition of economy involves a trillion dollars to send space men to the moon.  Nice to know.

And your economy involves letting those trillion dollars go and miss the oportunity to set reflectors.
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1017 on: August 31, 2016, 08:03:16 PM »
You don't get to just make up the laws of economics in order to try to support your world shape. 

*

SpJunk

  • 577
  • +0/-0
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1018 on: August 31, 2016, 08:06:42 PM »
You don't get to just make up the laws of economics in order to try to support your world shape.

Then stop trying it.

And since you are expert in English, you will know where to find translation for words "already there".
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

"Your lack of simplicity is main reason why not many people would bother to try to understand you." - S.M.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #1019 on: August 31, 2016, 08:10:33 PM »
You don't get to just make up the laws of economics in order to try to support your world shape.

Then stop trying it.

And since you are expert in English, you will know where to find translation for words "already there".

You might want to look up the definition of "allegedly."