FAO running dancing rayzor
Oh Jesus *face palm*,
ahhhh ha ha ha ha ha ha ah ha ha ha.....
You got a direct response,,
Seems I will have to repeat myself veeeery slowly.
sound of hammering clearly audible because why ?
You claim the sound is travelling through his hand (clearly exclaimed in your post)
My response was how is sound travelling
without direct contact on the Apollo excursions ?
clattering moon buggy compartment lids was one example,
Remember, you decided reptilian moon bases and a heavily choreographed dance number was the best response.
Added to this I also asked why sound does not travel through the hands of ISS manual labourers working in the vacuum,
(the post you are ignoring whilst claiming you answered it a week ago
)
And how sound does not propagate through solid hand held tools or the solid ISS whilst the observer is in the vacuum,
remember,
you gave examples of the observer being inside the air filled ISS,
Which is obviously unrelated to the subject.
Then you started your trip down memory lane pretending you elaborated on this obvious problem a week ago.
Let's try again....
I'm afraid your rather nasty insults, expletives, dance numbers and long distance running is only damaging your extremely tenuous logic and understanding.
(btw plagiarising phrases to repeat back to the original poster and the constant repetition makes you sound like a bot,
let me guess, "beep, does not compute, beep"
)
Anyway, response please.
Any chance of a response to the below ?
Or is more trolling,
more running,
more dancing your preferred debating style ?
back for more my running dancing friend ?
Still proving you are full of it ?
Still struggling with the very basic science which you claim needs to be "dumbed down" for me ?
Let me highlight your most obvious comprehension fails, and why your claims of understanding your own argument are hilarious internet slap stick
firstly you claimed to be proving sound travels through the vacuum of space with your first link,
Which states
" Finally, inside the ISS there indeed is a very high level of noise pollution."
The word "inside" is what you appear to be misunderstanding.
unless you are claiming that it's a vacuum "inside" the ISS then that's an epic face plant.
Secondly you link to an article I have being quoting for over a week 
Which states,
" As an EVA is in progress, you can hear the spacewalkers bumping and clanging along as your crewmates translate on the exterior of your module."
The word you are misunderstanding here is "exterior", he is describing sound from inside the ISS,
unless you are claiming that it's a vacuum "inside" the ISS.
EVEN YOUR LINK (that I posted a week ago) DEBUNKS YOUR OWN ARGUMENT,
" It is true, however, that sound cannot travel in a vacuum so you do not hear things outside. When you drive a bolt or tap a piece of equipment with a tool, you don't hear a thing. "
OUTSIDE THE ISS running dancing rayzor, OUTSIDE IN THE VACUUM OF SPACE.
your (originally mine) link continues to demolish your false sense of understanding with,
" One interesting thing that happens is that when you put your crewmates in the airlock to perform an EVA and then shut the hatch, at first you can hear a bunch of clanging as their metal tools softly strike the other equipment, handrails, or the hull of the small airlock. Then as you depress the airlock it still looks exactly the same through the hatch window. But now the clanging sound is gone. You can see their equipment bumping into stuff as before, but now it is silent."
I think the word you are struggling with here is "silent", even when the observer is inside the ISS.
there we have it,
Your inflated self image is in fact delusional idiocy,
That might sound harsh but I can only go on what you are posting,
Which clearly shows you are attempting to prove sound travels in a vacuum by quoting links that show sound travels through air.
sounds like internet slap stick idiocy to me.
I think this is where you claim to be "dumbing down" your misunderstanding of basic science and obvious struggles with the English language.
my spidey sense tells me you will begin an elaborate dance routine before running away shouting infantile insults over your shoulder,
all I ask is that you actually read and understand the links you are quoting, analyse the data and form a coherent factual explanation,
Please
[/quote]