moon hoax information index.

Rayzor,
Pretending to not comprehend the current thread discussion is not helping your self appointed credibility,
The challenge set was a chance for you to back up your quite long winded appeal for belief.
Anti up, throw in the towel or continue your comedic comprehension difficulty defence.
it's up to you.

But remember everyone reading this is following the flow,
and are possibly wondering what your sudden problem is with possessing "hours and hours" of video evidence, physics and logic.

Your constant protracted meltdowns are just derailing the thread,
and we don't want that, do we ?

Quote from: feuk on February 17, 2016, 01:15:15 AM

So sad to see you publicly meltdown into obvious delusion.
But I'm a nice guy so will give you another go.

You claimed to have "proved" sound travels in a vacuum because the evidence is ubiquitous in the Apollo movies.

Let's consider the claim the ISS is bristling with technology and the coverage is 24 hours a day,
many many hours of manual labour in the alleged vacuum of space,
Please provide just one example of sound travelling in a vacuum.
Just one.

should be easy,  no ?

Because I'm such a nice guy you can choose an example of either -
"drum skin" phenomena producing sound
or
Sound simply travelling in a vacuum through a solid and being recorded.

There are hours and hours of manual labour footage in the vacuum so I don't expect it to take to long.
(especially as the slightest sound of rustling or chink of metal on metal was recorded in the vacuum during the Apollo movies)

 
I will come back and check mate 

^ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha....

oh man.

You are obviously absolutely petrified to back up your wild claims with actual evidence.
run rayzor ruuuuuun.


Shame.
 

Edit - your link was addressed
You ran away.

Run rayzor ruuuuuuuuun.

Really,  do you seriously want to debate aerodynamics of space vehicles?

You are the one saying sounds shouldn't be heard,  so why don't you back up your argument with some evidence?   
Oh wait,  you don't have any evidence....  just your self imposed ignorance   

I can at least help you understand where you went wrong...

Here is a quote just for running rayzor.

Garrett Reisman
NASA spaceman.

"It is true, however, that sound cannot travel in a vacuum so you do not hear things outside.  When you drive a bolt or tap a piece of equipment with a tool, you don't hear a thing." 
 
oops,


" One interesting thing that happens is that when you put your crewmates in the airlock to perform an EVA and then shut the hatch, at first you can hear a bunch of clanging as their metal tools softly strike the other equipment, handrails, or the hull of the small airlock.  Then as you depress the airlock it still looks exactly the same through the hatch window.  But now the clanging sound is gone.  You can see their equipment bumping into stuff as before, but now it is silent."
   

"It is true, however, that sound cannot travel in a vacuum so you do not hear things outside.  When you drive a bolt or tap a piece of equipment with a tool, you don't hear a thing." 
 

Sound propagation does not happen on the ISS according to the NASA spaceman.

The moon landings were real..... 

So finally you understand that sound doesn't travel in a vacuum,  well done.   Now, do you also understand that sound does travel through solid materials?

You are the one saying sounds shouldn't be heard,  so why don't you back up your argument with some evidence?   
Oh wait,  you don't have any evidence....  just your self imposed ignorance   

Garrett Reisman
NASA spaceman.

"It is true, however, that sound cannot travel in a vacuum so you do not hear things outside.  When you drive a bolt or tap a piece of equipment with a tool, you don't hear a thing." 
 
oops,


" One interesting thing that happens is that when you put your crewmates in the airlock to perform an EVA and then shut the hatch, at first you can hear a bunch of clanging as their metal tools softly strike the other equipment, handrails, or the hull of the small airlock.  Then as you depress the airlock it still looks exactly the same through the hatch window.  But now the clanging sound is gone.  You can see their equipment bumping into stuff as before, but now it is silent."
   

Quote from: Rayzor on February 17, 2016, 06:28:52 AM

So finally you understand that sound doesn't travel in a vacuum,  well done.   Now, do you also understand that sound does travel through solid materials?

Quote from: Rayzor on February 16, 2016, 07:13:18 AM

You are the one saying sounds shouldn't be heard,  so why don't you back up your argument with some evidence?   
Oh wait,  you don't have any evidence....  just your self imposed ignorance   

Quote from: feuk on February 17, 2016, 05:46:30 AM

Garrett Reisman
NASA spaceman.

"It is true, however, that sound cannot travel in a vacuum so you do not hear things outside.  When you drive a bolt or tap a piece of equipment with a tool, you don't hear a thing." 
 
oops,


" One interesting thing that happens is that when you put your crewmates in the airlock to perform an EVA and then shut the hatch, at first you can hear a bunch of clanging as their metal tools softly strike the other equipment, handrails, or the hull of the small airlock.  Then as you depress the airlock it still looks exactly the same through the hatch window.  But now the clanging sound is gone.  You can see their equipment bumping into stuff as before, but now it is silent."
   

Oops.

I'm actually quite shocked you are continuing.

Sound propagation does not happen on the ISS according to the NASA spaceman.

But please continue,
I'm enjoying the show 

No one likes a bad loser rayzor.

Especially when they have to lie to try and save the tattered remains of any credibility.

It's actually quite sad to witness.

Yakkety-yakkety-yak!

Quote from: Australian Vermin on February 17, 2016, 09:23:52 AM

Yakkety-yakkety-yak!

The name of the song is in fact 'Yakety Sax' by Boots Randolph & it was used as the theme music for the Benny Hill show.

Yet thin aluminium sheeting was enough for the 24,500mph Saturn V trash-penis?

It doesn't take a genius to see that there's something very wrong about the above numbers...

Quote from: feuk on February 17, 2016, 07:01:26 AM

No one likes a bad loser rayzor.

Especially when they have to lie to try and save the tattered remains of any credibility.

It's actually quite sad to witness.

What is actually sad to witness is that your only shred of evidence is some subjective speculation that sound does or does not propagate through a vacuum. Really? Is that the only thing you guys got on the moon exploration "hoax"? Seems a bit thin too me (<-see what I did there?).

One of the things I think you guys are forgetting is that the moon has an atmosphere. It may be much less substantial than Earth's atmosphere, but it's still there. And as we all know, sounds travels through an atmosphere no matter how dense it is. Another point to make against your argument, feuk, is that material science has advanced exponentially since the expedition to the moon. Materials used in newer space exploration vehicles and suits are much more insulated (there are near-vacuums between space and the inside of a space suit or vehicle), naturally it would be expected that a modern space traveler would hear much less (if anything) of something going on outside of their craft than someone on the moon using technology almost 50 years old.

Yakkety-yakkety-yak!

Lies & NO U!!!

Now that rayzor has raised the white flag let's get back to the information.

What should be absolutely clear is the huge  contradictions between the Apollo information and the ISS information.

The videos of the players working in the alleged vacuum of space could not be more different.

every clink, click, rustle, clatter, bang and crash in an alleged vacuum can be clearly heard on the audio during the Apollo movies,

no external sound at all is heard on the audio of those working in the alleged vacuum around the ISS.

We have read the testimony of the complete lack of sound even when holding an object being struck against a solid,
Or when sound has the chance to travel through a solid air lock.

We have also seen the wilful ignorance to dismiss the testimony and video evidence to protect the Apollo story.

It's clear cut,

of course the movies might just be produced by more informed individuals these days,

But one thing is beyond debate,
The very noisy Apollo excursions into the vacuum are pure anti scientific theatre.

case closed.

every clink, click, rustle, clatter, bang and crash in an alleged vacuum can be clearly heard on the audio during the Apollo movies,

Endless cycle of Lies, Ranting, Meltdowns & Psychopathic Mirroring...

Aluminium melts at 600C & fails structurally in aerospace applications at 350C max.

The SR-71 had to be made of titanium (melting point 1700C) to withstand the Aerodynamic Heating of 600+C caused by going at only 2,200+mph.

Yet thin aluminium sheeting was enough for the 24,500mph Saturn V trash-penis?

It doesn't take a genius to see that there's something very wrong about the above numbers...

Someone's telling porkies; my money's on NASA.

Here is a quote just for running rayzor.

Garrett Reisman
NASA spaceman.

"It is true, however, that sound cannot travel in a vacuum so you do not hear things outside.  When you drive a bolt or tap a piece of equipment with a tool, you don't hear a thing." 
 
oops,


" One interesting thing that happens is that when you put your crewmates in the airlock to perform an EVA and then shut the hatch, at first you can hear a bunch of clanging as their metal tools softly strike the other equipment, handrails, or the hull of the small airlock.  Then as you depress the airlock it still looks exactly the same through the hatch window.  But now the clanging sound is gone.  You can see their equipment bumping into stuff as before, but now it is silent."

Silent ?
please clear up these obvious lies by a NASA space man running rayzor,
or alternatively admit to just making shit up and claiming it to be fact and anyone who disagrees is "stupid".

This should be good 
(please no meltdowns, just respond to the information, thankyou)

Quote from: Rayzor on February 16, 2016, 03:44:08 PM

Sure would,  and  proved it too.   Then  feuk  went into some weird kind of denial  episode.    Classic pigeons playing chess move.

So sad to see you publicly meltdown into obvious delusion.
But I'm a nice guy so will give you another go.

You claimed to have "proved" sound travels in a vacuum because the evidence is ubiquitous in the Apollo movies.

Let's consider the claim the ISS is bristling with technology and the coverage is 24 hours a day,
many many hours of manual labour in the alleged vacuum of space,
Please provide just one example of sound travelling in a vacuum.
Just one.

should be easy,  no ?

Because I'm such a nice guy you can choose an example of either -
"drum skin" phenomena producing sound
or
Sound simply travelling in a vacuum through a solid and being recorded.

There are hours and hours of manual labour footage in the vacuum so I don't expect it to take to long.
(especially as the slightest sound of rustling or chink of metal on metal was recorded in the vacuum during the Apollo movies)

 
I will come back and check mate 

wow rayzor, you must be a masochist.

how many times are you going to make a false statement, get found out, claim victory and hide behind a meme.

now you demand evidence the Apollo excursions are noisy...ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

just watch any "lunar" excursion.
you yourself (and others) have being defending the noise for days with incorrect and false statements,

What are you now saying there is no noise ?
because it's a vacuum ?

 

Poor rayzor, your ridiculous and inaccurate mental gymnastics have you tied up in knots,
shame,
but funny 

You claimed to have "proved" sound travels in a vacuum because the evidence is ubiquitous in the Apollo movies.

You have tried in vain to find a single piece of evidence the moon landings were faked

[Toodle-pip, Proven Psychopathic Liar!

It is a Heavily Guarded and Secret Base that is at about the 10 o’clock position, on the Back Side of the Moon. The portion that is visible is a “Trapezoid Shape”. It is only accessible to the Dark Fleet and some ICC Personnel as well as the Draco Allied Forces. Some amateur astronomers have caught video of swarms of craft leaving from this base location on a couple of occasions. It is presumed to go far beneath the surface of the Moon just as the LOC does.

Of course we've been to the moon. We never left.

http://exopolitics.org/secret-moon-base-uses-abducted-humans-as-slave-labor/

The Trapezoid utilizes kidnapped human children as slave labor and is a highly secured complex utilized for the rendition of ambitions and programmes concerning the US military-industrial complex's ambitions at the militarization of space and the 12 planets.

Quote

It is a Heavily Guarded and Secret Base that is at about the 10 o’clock position, on the Back Side of the Moon. The portion that is visible is a “Trapezoid Shape”. It is only accessible to the Dark Fleet and some ICC Personnel as well as the Draco Allied Forces. Some amateur astronomers have caught video of swarms of craft leaving from this base location on a couple of occasions. It is presumed to go far beneath the surface of the Moon just as the LOC does.

Furthermore, there is also evidence of fleet-building on Mars.

http://ufodigest.com/article/naval-intelligence-officer-corroborates-us-mars-bases-and-time-travel

http://www.interdimensioncomm.com/Marsbase.htm

What do the reptilian aliens want?   Has anyone asked them?

lol wut!

Aluminium melts at 600C & fails structurally in aerospace applications at 350C max.

The SR-71 had to be made of titanium (melting point 1700C) to withstand the Aerodynamic Heating of 600+C caused by going at only 2,200+mph.

Yet thin aluminium sheeting was enough for the 24,500mph Saturn V trash-penis?

It doesn't take a genius to see that there's something very wrong about the above numbers...

Someone's telling porkies; my money's on NASA.