moon hoax information index.

  • 1150 Replies
  • 208304 Views
*

Rayzor

  • 12193
  • Looking for Occam
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #90 on: February 04, 2016, 03:44:29 PM »
Lol.

What is the most compelling piece of evidence that convinced YOU that man went to the moon.

Don't be scared guys,

surely you should be proud and all to eager to share the single most compelling evidence that makes YOU a believer.

No-one who lived through that time with even a passing interest in space  would even ask such a question,   why not read the detailed mission reports on all the Gemini,  Surveyor,  Ranger missions and then when you've got a handle on that,  start on the Soviet Luna missions.   Plenty of evidence there as well.    Ok now you are getting up to speed, you can start on Apollo, the Saturn 5, the days and days of continuous television and media coverage,  the six separate manned landing missions.   

Now go away and do some basic research before asking others to do it for you. 

And while we are at it,  I've yet to see a SINGLE piece of evidence that ANY misson has been faked,  and there are hundreds of missions to the moon and elsewhere.

So,  is there any evidence that the moon missions were faked,  nope.   None at all.

Has Bart Sibrel been proven to have lied and deliberately edited material to give a false impression.  YES HE  A PROVEN LIAR.   You can add Ralph Rene, and Bill Kaysing,  publicity seeking nutters.

My conclusion, is that anyone who thinks the moon landings were faked,  should get measured up for a tin foil hat.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #91 on: February 04, 2016, 04:26:35 PM »
Having a bad day Geoff?

Anyone who thinks they made a 360 foot high flying machine in the 1960s out of mild steel & aluminium sheeting, filled with 1,000s of tons of the most volatile & dangerous chemicals known to man, that was then set on fire, causing it to shoot off at 25,000 mph on a 500,000 mile journey to teh munn & back, is epically retarded.

I mean just epically.

Every single item of equipment in the Apollo programme looks like it came from a builders skip or a scrapyard.

It's a joke.

And wasting time poring over every shred of fake evidence from it won't change that.
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

Rayzor

  • 12193
  • Looking for Occam
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #92 on: February 04, 2016, 05:47:28 PM »
Having a bad day Geoff?

Anyone who thinks they made a 360 foot high flying machine in the 1960s out of mild steel & aluminium sheeting, filled with 1,000s of tons of the most volatile & dangerous chemicals known to man, that was then set on fire, causing it to shoot off at 25,000 mph on a 500,000 mile journey to teh munn & back, is epically retarded.

I mean just epically.

Every single item of equipment in the Apollo programme looks like it came from a builders skip or a scrapyard.

It's a joke.

And wasting time poring over every shred of fake evidence from it won't change that.

Argument from your personal incredulity isn't valid, when we are talking about more than a decade of work from  hundreds of thousands of scientists, engineers, and the best and brightest of a generation.

Show me some evidence to back up your claims, rather than just vomiting up your own opinions based on your limited world experience and general ignorance.

Oh wait,  you don't actually have any evidence,   that's because you are just trolling another thread when everyone is ignoring you on the other threads.  LOL!

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #93 on: February 05, 2016, 12:06:04 AM »

Anyone who thinks they made a 360 foot high flying machine in the 1960s out of mild steel & aluminium sheeting, filled with 1,000s of tons of the most volatile & dangerous chemicals known to man, that was then set on fire, causing it to shoot off at 25,000 mph on a 500,000 mile journey to teh munn & back, is epically retarded.

I would hardly call Kerosene, Oxygen and Hydrogen some of the most dangerous chemicals known to man....
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by ignorance or stupidity.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #94 on: February 05, 2016, 12:41:49 AM »
I APPEAL TO AUTHORITY EVERY POST & AM CLOSE TO TEARS!
Still having a bad day, Geoff?

Cos you seem to be having some kind of persistent hallucination that 'hundreds of thousands of the best & brightest' were involved in the fabrication of a giant explosives-filled trash-penis 50 years ago that flew to teh munn & back after being set on fire...

Having said that, you've also hallucinated a visit to CERN & some nonsense about a 75-ton space-glider launch in the past, so you do have previous.

Is it the menopause, deary?

Anyhoo; for any readers out there not affected to the point of permanent delirium by cheesy Hollywood propaganda & military intelligence deception operations, I suggest a look at www.projectrho.com 'atomic rockets'.

This is a website set up by a sci-fi worshipping mega-nerd that lumps all 'shpayze-rokkits', both 'factual' & 'fictional' together...

It is a hilarious read; good luck discerning the line between 'real' & 'imaginary'.

Toodle-pip, Dame Edna!
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #95 on: February 05, 2016, 12:51:53 AM »
I would hardly call Kerosene, Oxygen and Hydrogen some of the most dangerous chemicals known to man....

Well. Almost everyone who has ever breathed oxygen has died. Almost everyone who has ever ingested a hydrogen compund has died, as well.

But I also think the price goes to fluorine.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #96 on: February 05, 2016, 01:15:28 AM »
Yeah: liquid oxygen, liquid hydrogen, kerosene, aerozine 50 & nitrogen tetroxide...

All perfectly safe to handle & non-volatile.

Just pile 1000s of tons of em up together in a giant trash-penis full of miles of plumbing & electronic wiring then set fire to it...

No problems there at all; next stop teh munn!

Nothing to see here, folks, move along...

Thought Police at work!
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

feuk

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 570
  • ^ hmmmmm
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #97 on: February 05, 2016, 02:34:37 AM »
@manaeswolf

I can see your reasoning,
but plenty of random people claim to be able to see Apollo debris on the surface with telescopes and binoculars from their back garden.
Obviously these people are idiots, but does their discredited claim lead you to believe there is no debris on the surface ?
I'm guessing not.


@rayzor

same old nonsense from you mate,
I'm very well read on the official narrative (more so than you by the looks of it),
there are plenty of issues that jump out,
However I am simply asking YOU what in YOUR opinion is the single most compelling piece of evidence that man walked on the moon.

tricky dicky was a proven liar and a criminal when he was making moon phone calls,
I assume you have no problem with proven liars and criminals who believe the moon story,
yet are quite happy to accuse non believers of lying without any facts or evidence of wrong doing.

obviously you don't have the confidence to just throw something out there from your vast knowledge that has not being pre prepared by someone else.

Which is a bit strange I'm sure you will agree.

Stop  :'(
 
and simply share YOUR most compelling piece of evidence, I really don't see the problem, you claim to have studied volumes of evidence. I'm giving you the chance to show me up.

Will you take it ?
"How can I help but see what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."
"Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It's not easy to become sane."

*

Rayzor

  • 12193
  • Looking for Occam
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #98 on: February 05, 2016, 03:24:08 AM »
and simply share YOUR most compelling piece of evidence, I really don't see the problem, you claim to have studied volumes of evidence. I'm giving you the chance to show me up.

You sound like you might want to be convinced,  Ok,  here is a small taste,   I can find hundreds more, plus detailed mission reports,  let me know when you've watched them all.

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

Skipped another 26 hours of Apollo 10 if you are really interested.

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available

#" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">! No longer available


That's about the embedding limit for a single post,  do want some more.
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.


*

Rayzor

  • 12193
  • Looking for Occam
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #100 on: February 05, 2016, 04:02:26 AM »
Here is a guy who has gone to the trouble to assemble the audio and video and put the entire Apollo 17 mission in real time.   

http://apollo17.org/

« Last Edit: February 05, 2016, 04:04:37 AM by Rayzor »
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #101 on: February 05, 2016, 04:56:59 AM »
In quite the frenzy today, aren't you Geoff?

Are you upset that no-one believes your silly childhood munn-fables any more?

You should go take a look at www.projectrho.com 'atomic rockets'.

Bathe in all the sci-fi gibberish there, mixed up with 'real' space missions so as to be indistinguishable...

Suck your thumb whilst doing so.

And keep repeating: 'There's no place like space! There's no place like space!'
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

Yendor

  • 1676
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #102 on: February 05, 2016, 06:49:28 AM »
Here is a guy who has gone to the trouble to assemble the audio and video and put the entire Apollo 17 mission in real time.   

http://apollo17.org/

I have to jump in here for a moment. Rayzor, what is this vertical line running from top to bottom on the moon? While I was watching, It wasn't there then all of a sudden it was. Don't say it is a hair either.

Could it be where they pasted two painter's paintings together?
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
                              George Orwell

*

Rayzor

  • 12193
  • Looking for Occam
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #103 on: February 05, 2016, 07:02:35 AM »
Here is a guy who has gone to the trouble to assemble the audio and video and put the entire Apollo 17 mission in real time.   

http://apollo17.org/

I have to jump in here for a moment. Rayzor, what is this vertical line running from top to bottom on the moon? While I was watching, It wasn't there then all of a sudden it was. Don't say it is a hair either.

Could it be where they pasted two painter's paintings together?


Not sure, what the line is,  is it from a still camera or a video camera, and which one.

The bottom picture is the model of the moon that they made for the flight simulator to train the LM pilots,   there is a camera that flies across the surface of the model giving the simulator pilot a view that is a reasonably accurate picture of the moons geographic features. 




More information on the simulator here
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2237819/NASAs-ingenious-moon-simulator-helped-prepare-Apollo-astronauts-land-gone-before.html#ixzz2DYzjQU00
« Last Edit: February 05, 2016, 07:07:39 AM by Rayzor »
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Rayzor

  • 12193
  • Looking for Occam
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #104 on: February 05, 2016, 07:31:01 AM »

I have to jump in here for a moment. Rayzor, what is this vertical line running from top to bottom on the moon? While I was watching, It wasn't there then all of a sudden it was. Don't say it is a hair either.

That's from the Ranger VII  mission,  which  was the first to actually reach the moon and send back pictures before it crashed. 
Details of the camera are here.   http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ranger/
More here http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/ranger-7/

The line you refer to is only in one tv frame,  i've  no idea what it is?  it might be just a pixel dropped for one frame.
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #105 on: February 05, 2016, 07:38:23 AM »
More information on the simulator here
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2237819/NASAs-ingenious-moon-simulator-helped-prepare-Apollo-astronauts-land-gone-before.html#ixzz2DYzjQU00

Linking to The Daily Mail as 'proof' now?

What next; the National Enquirer?

The Beano?

Aren't you embarrassed to still be defending this blatant fraud after 50 years?

Be honest; what did you do to end up in this position?

Get it all off your chest, eh?

In the form of a mighty quintuple shitpost spam-frenzy perhaps...

That seems to be your preferred method today.

Did you check out www.projectrho.com atomic rockets btw?

Lulzy stuff!

Hope it calmed you down...

Toodle-pip, Thumbsucker!
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

Yendor

  • 1676
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #106 on: February 05, 2016, 08:50:15 AM »

I have to jump in here for a moment. Rayzor, what is this vertical line running from top to bottom on the moon? While I was watching, It wasn't there then all of a sudden it was. Don't say it is a hair either.

That's from the Ranger VII  mission,  which  was the first to actually reach the moon and send back pictures before it crashed. 
Details of the camera are here.   http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/ranger/
More here http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/ranger-7/

The line you refer to is only in one tv frame,  i've  no idea what it is?  it might be just a pixel dropped for one frame.

I realize the picture of the guy painting the moon was done in 1964 for simulation according to NASA. What leads you to believe they weren't done for Ranger and the guy is just touching them up. Why would you suppose they need models of the moon with such detail if they were only going to use them for simulation purposes only? In the second video the same picture appears again along with the the same line. It is also from Ranger 7.


Also in the second video, they are talking about Ranger 8 and a picture appears that looks to have the same kind of line on it too. It is on the right side of the screen and it is hard to see. You have to be quick or you will miss it. Just as soon as you see it the video goes black. It's at 5:59 into the video.


I'm backing out of the thread, I've infringed on it enough... sorry.
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
                              George Orwell

Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #107 on: February 05, 2016, 09:17:57 AM »
Damn! Homie Rayzor just owned all y'alls' asses! And all the opposition can do is ask rhetorical questions that fit their "beliefs"! No surprise there!

SPOILER ALERT:
FE'ers don't even believe in FET. They're just here to waste your time, demoralize you, and make you doubt your own train of thought. There are plenty of signs for this:
1. FE'ers never provide evidence backed against any impenetrable scientific or empirical method
2. Most of what they post are irrational statements trying to undermine your intelligence with total disregard to the sound argument you have made against them.
3. Lack of evidence
4. Lack of evidence
5. Lack of evidence
And 6 (probably the most significant point). I'm sure you have noticed some FE'ers (the main posters) ARE deep and logical thinkers (How else would they be able to keep you having to explain RE or the moon expedition?). The only thing that might convince you otherwise is their claimed belief in FET. So, how have they not come to the conclusion of the truth by now?

But oh no! watch out for jroa! I estimate that in less than 3 hours this thread will be moved to 'angry ranting' because of this one post. (They don't want their secret to get out)

Spread the word and disperse from here when you've had your fill. Staying on this site accomplishes nothing. Instead of trying to start a fire that has already burned out; find the fires that are still burning and stoke them.

BYE FES forums! Farewell and good luck to ALL!!
« Last Edit: February 05, 2016, 09:20:06 AM by GlobeDebunker »

To fall into the belief of a flat Earth is to deny YOUR OWN cognizance.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #108 on: February 05, 2016, 10:11:17 AM »
Damn! Homie Rayzor just owned all y'alls' asses!

LOL!!!

Hi Geoff!

In fact, 'Homie Rayzor' (i.e. YOU, Geoff) just had a very public nervous breakdown.

Guess I must have evoked a few too many repressed memories?

This forum is mental.

It's not as mental as www.projectrho.com 'atomic rockets' though...

Check it out, neutrals; it's a real eye-opener!

Toodle-pip, schizo-puppet Geoffrey army!
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!

*

legion

  • 1593
  • You are in my VR
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #109 on: February 05, 2016, 10:40:23 AM »
Damn! Homie Rayzor just owned all y'alls' asses! And all the opposition can do is ask rhetorical questions that fit their "beliefs"! No surprise there!

SPOILER ALERT:
FE'ers don't even believe in FET. They're just here to waste your time, demoralize you, and make you doubt your own train of thought. There are plenty of signs for this:
1. FE'ers never provide evidence backed against any impenetrable scientific or empirical method
2. Most of what they post are irrational statements trying to undermine your intelligence with total disregard to the sound argument you have made against them.
3. Lack of evidence
4. Lack of evidence
5. Lack of evidence
And 6 (probably the most significant point). I'm sure you have noticed some FE'ers (the main posters) ARE deep and logical thinkers (How else would they be able to keep you having to explain RE or the moon expedition?). The only thing that might convince you otherwise is their claimed belief in FET. So, how have they not come to the conclusion of the truth by now?

But oh no! watch out for jroa! I estimate that in less than 3 hours this thread will be moved to 'angry ranting' because of this one post. (They don't want their secret to get out)

Spread the word and disperse from here when you've had your fill. Staying on this site accomplishes nothing. Instead of trying to start a fire that has already burned out; find the fires that are still burning and stoke them.

BYE FES forums! Farewell and good luck to ALL!!

You'll be back. You lot can't help yourselves.

"They're just here to waste your time, demoralize you, and make you doubt your own train of thought."

But, it is you who come here to waste their time. Or did an FE'er invite you here? Of course not.
"Indoctrination [...] is often distinguished from education by the fact that the indoctrinated person is expected not to question or critically examine the doctrine they have learned".

Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #110 on: February 05, 2016, 10:50:08 AM »
I realize the picture of the guy painting the moon was done in 1964 for simulation according to NASA. What leads you to believe they weren't done for Ranger and the guy is just touching them up. Why would you suppose they need models of the moon with such detail if they were only going to use them for simulation purposes only? In the second video the same picture appears again along with the the same line. It is also from Ranger 7.

If it were a painting, why would the line only show up in a single frame and not all the other frames? did they paint a new painting for every single frame? And if they did that, why did they need two paintings for just this individual frame?

*

Yendor

  • 1676
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #111 on: February 05, 2016, 11:59:59 AM »
I realize the picture of the guy painting the moon was done in 1964 for simulation according to NASA. What leads you to believe they weren't done for Ranger and the guy is just touching them up. Why would you suppose they need models of the moon with such detail if they were only going to use them for simulation purposes only? In the second video the same picture appears again along with the the same line. It is also from Ranger 7.

If it were a painting, why would the line only show up in a single frame and not all the other frames? did they paint a new painting for every single frame? And if they did that, why did they need two paintings for just this individual frame?

What they are doing is showing the video as the Ranger 7 is coming down to the moon. The video is showing a frame every 20 seconds so it is not at real time. The Ranger keeps getting closer and closer 20 second frames at a time. Then all of a sudden the line appears in one frame and the next frame it is gone. If you watch it at normal speed you won't see it. I was stepping it a frame at a time, that is why I saw it. I believe they had to make two painting and glue them together to form one continuous picture. I asked Rayzor why they had to show such detail in the pictures of the moon they painted if they only were used for simulation? I believe it is because they may have used the for simulation, but they also used them for videos like the ones Rayzor presented. If they didn't go into such detail, astronomers would be able to tell they were not of the moon. Look at the guy with the airbrush in his hand. I'm sure he is an artist with pictures taken of the moon with high power telescopes. The last line I presented looked the same, except this time you only got a glimpse of it. Just as soon as it was there a moment later the video stopped. Most people would have never noticed it. I only did because I was stepping through the video.
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
                              George Orwell

Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #112 on: February 05, 2016, 12:29:06 PM »
I believe they had to make two painting and glue them together to form one continuous picture.

That doesn't fit the observations. The frames immediately preceeding and following the frame with the line show the terrain the line went through. A "cut" would be visible in other frames showing the same terrain.

I suspect it's simply noise in the signal. Packet loss, to use the modern term.

*

Yendor

  • 1676
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #113 on: February 05, 2016, 12:47:35 PM »
I believe they had to make two painting and glue them together to form one continuous picture.

That doesn't fit the observations. The frames immediately preceeding and following the frame with the line show the terrain the line went through. A "cut" would be visible in other frames showing the same terrain.

I suspect it's simply noise in the signal. Packet loss, to use the modern term.

Think what you will.
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
                              George Orwell

*

legion

  • 1593
  • You are in my VR
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #114 on: February 05, 2016, 12:53:37 PM »
I believe they had to make two painting and glue them together to form one continuous picture.

That doesn't fit the observations. The frames immediately preceeding and following the frame with the line show the terrain the line went through. A "cut" would be visible in other frames showing the same terrain.

I suspect it's simply noise in the signal. Packet loss, to use the modern term.

Think what you will.

Yendor, I wouldn't waste any time on this character. He/she/it will deny, excuse and back pedal constantly.

Just my advice from experience.
"Indoctrination [...] is often distinguished from education by the fact that the indoctrinated person is expected not to question or critically examine the doctrine they have learned".

*

Yendor

  • 1676
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #115 on: February 05, 2016, 02:28:46 PM »
I believe they had to make two painting and glue them together to form one continuous picture.

That doesn't fit the observations. The frames immediately preceeding and following the frame with the line show the terrain the line went through. A "cut" would be visible in other frames showing the same terrain.

I suspect it's simply noise in the signal. Packet loss, to use the modern term.

Think what you will.

Yendor, I wouldn't waste any time on this character. He/she/it will deny, excuse and back pedal constantly.

Just my advice from experience.

Read my above answer...I'm not going to discuss this anymore with him. He thinks a straight line is noise in the signal. Strange the same straight line happened on another Rover expedition, wouldn't you think? I believe he is just being obstinate because his answer shows no logic. I'm sure I could go through all the videos Rayzor presented as his proof for the moon landing and find plenty anomalies. I did watch another video and it didn't show any of the loose objects floating around like they do on the ISS. These early videos are easy to find anomalies in because  when they were made no one questioned them. They simply accepted them as facts.
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
                              George Orwell

*

Rayzor

  • 12193
  • Looking for Occam
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #116 on: February 05, 2016, 03:43:36 PM »

Read my above answer...I'm not going to discuss this anymore with him. He thinks a straight line is noise in the signal. Strange the same straight line happened on another Rover expedition, wouldn't you think? I believe he is just being obstinate because his answer shows no logic. I'm sure I could go through all the videos Rayzor presented as his proof for the moon landing and find plenty anomalies. I did watch another video and it didn't show any of the loose objects floating around like they do on the ISS. These early videos are easy to find anomalies in because  when they were made no one questioned them. They simply accepted them as facts.

The Ranger pictures were used to produce the early detailed maps,   and a lot of academic research on lunar geology used data from Ranger Missions. 

Caltech  were responsible for camera calibration and performance,   their report is here http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1966IAUTB..12..657S
I was hoping to find some schematics on the system to see what could cause a vertical line drop out,  but so far no luck,  the video was from CameraA which is the wide field
camera,  there was a total of six cameras. 

To me it doesn't look like electrical noise or signal degradation,   the cameras were designed for photometric purposes,  that is they were analysed in great detail to measure the surface features,  lunar mares, rays from impact craters etc.

Ranger VI camera system failed, and it crashed without sending back any pictures,  so Ranger VII was big headline news in 1964 it sent back more than 4000 pictures.

Remember too,  that the Soviets had at that time,  had a string on Luna missions fail, following the early successes of Luna 2,  first man made object to reach the moon,  and Luna 3 which took the first pictures of the dark side of the moon,  both successes were in 1959, about 5 years earlier.

So the Americans were pretty keen to let the world know they were catching up with the Soviets.

Here is the New York Times front page for that day,


« Last Edit: February 05, 2016, 03:48:15 PM by Rayzor »
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Rayzor

  • 12193
  • Looking for Occam
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #117 on: February 05, 2016, 05:04:36 PM »
Here is a description of the camera system used on Ranger 7

The television system consisted of a six slow-scan vidicon TV cameras capable of transmitting high-resolution, close-up television pictures of the lunar surface during the final minutes of flight before the spacecraft impacted the lunar surface. These photographs provided large-scale topographic information needed for the Surveyor and Apollo projects. Vidicons 2.54 cm in diameter with an antimony-sulfide oxy-sulfide (ASOS) photoconductor target were used for image sensing in all six cameras. There were two camera channels which had independent power distribution networks so that the greatest reliability and probability of obtaining highest quality video pictures would be afforded. The first channel had two full-scan cameras, one wide angle (25 degree field of view and 25-mm focal length) designated the A-camera and one narrow angle (8.4 degree field of view and 76-mm focal length) B-camera. These cameras utilized an active image area of 11 sq mm that contained 1150 lines and was scanned in 2.5 sec. Scan and erase cycles were designed to act alternately resulting in intervals of 5 sec between consecutive pictures on a particular camera. The other channel had four partial-scan p-cameras, two narrow angle and two wide angle. The image area of these four cameras was 2.8 sq mm which contained 300 lines and was scanned in 0.2 sec. The instrument allowed for camera fields of view, ranging from 25 deg to 2.1 deg, to overlap and produce a 'nesting' sequence of pictures.

Electromagnetically driven slit-type shutters exposed the vidicons. Images were focused on the vidicon target, which was made up of a layer of photoconductive material initially charged by scanning with an electron beam. An electron beam then scanned the surface and recharged the photoconductor. The video signal was amplified several thousand times, sent to the transmitter where amplitude variations were converted to frquency variations, and were then transmitted directly to Earth. At the end of the active scan, the camera entered an erase cycle to prepare it for the next exposure. Twelve P-channel pictures were exposed between each F-channel picture.

The video transmissions were sent to a television receiver and recorded on both kinoscope film recorders and magnetic tape recorders. A cathode-ray tube reconstructed the original image, which was then photographed on 35-mm film. The full-scan camera system began transmitting pictures at 1308 UT on July 31, 1964, 17 min 13 sec prior to impact. The partial-scan system initiated transmission of pictures at 1312 UT, 13 min 40 sec prior to impact. The last full-scan transmission occured between 2.5 and 5 sec before impact, while the last partial-scan picture was taken between 0.2 and 0.4 sec before impact and achieved resolution to 0.5 m. Image motion is more severe in the last pictures. The experiment returned 4308 photographs of excellent quality. Selected photographs and a more complete description of the TV experiment are included in data set 64-041A-01B.


The thing to note is that they went to kinescope after receiving the SSTV images,  and then onto 35mm film. 

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Rayzor

  • 12193
  • Looking for Occam
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #118 on: February 05, 2016, 05:11:46 PM »
Are we ready to move onto the Surveyor missions and the Soviet moon rover Lunokhod 1?

Or do you want to continue the discussion on the other Ranger missions 8 and 9.


Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

?

Papa Legba

  • Ranters
  • 9566
  • Welcome to the CIA Troll/Shill Society.
Re: moon hoax information index.
« Reply #119 on: February 05, 2016, 05:23:15 PM »
Still having a bad day, 'Homie Rayzor'?

Because you seem to have forgotten the OP was about the fake-as-tits-on-a-bull Apollo missions, 'Homie Rayzor'.

But do carry on your shitpost frenzy about all fake shpayze-ecksplurayshun, ever, 'Homie Rayzor'...

Because it makes you look like a complete idiot, 'Homie Rayzor'.

Been to www.projectrho.com 'atomic rockets' yet, 'Homie Rayzor'?

Did it give you a little space-woody, 'Homie Rayzor'?

LOL!!!

'Homie Rayzor'...

That was a beauty; how drunk were you when you decided it'd be a good idea to write it about yourself, 'Homie Rayzor'?
I got Trolled & Shilled at the CIA Troll/Shill Society and now I feel EPIC!!!