See, Rama Set, that is just where you present more of your own crass conduct. If you are going to sit there and whine about people who believe (which you do incessantly), it would behoove you to find out WHAT they believe. But you would rather put us all into an amorphous group.
That is the thing with most atheist types. They would would rather paint ALL believers as intolerant ignorami. The fact that Judaism and Shinto are 2 of the most tolerant religions on Earth does not register with the atheist mindset. In their mind, any religious person MUST be a dolt and intolerant. After all, it is this assumption that allows them to sleep at night and not think of the brutalities that atheism has visited upon people in the name of Militant Godlessness (to use the Russian term for it; they actually had an organisation named "the League of the Militant Godless" that went about destroying churches and killing priests and nuns and the like in the name of their Godlessness).
I of course don't dispute that some religions can be quite intolerant. But none have aproached the level of vicious intolerance displayed by atheism that lashes out and rages like a petulant child against anything that challenges it. The League of the Militant Godless was just one example. During the Chinese GPCR, "Destroying the Four Olds" was another. Under that rubric the Red Guards went into Tibet. In 1966 there were 6000 monasteries in the region. By 1976 there only 8 left. Say hello to Atheism, Class.
In Albania in 1967, the Socialist Republic was OFFICIALLY declared an Atheist State. No other country in the world has EVER gone that far. Attendence at, or participation in, any religious exercise was declared illegal. Ownership of a Bible or Qur'an became punishable by shooting.
So the question isn't about a person's individual right to believe or not to believe. The question is what non-believers do when they become the majority. As we have seen, the results have a high risk of being disastrous. This much is obvious.